Pandan

This lore is [under Review]. Please expect a response within a week or just afterward, feel free to continue to submit criticism should you deem it appropriate.

Trade Completed.

Completed.

Mcname(s): Malgonious Why he/she is blacklisted: Informing player items could only be returned if they made an orc character after robbing items through PvP. http://imgur.com/w3GMgNX,W0pt2wL,eXVqpK1,Vq39pJ2,t3AqVrR,CnCOypI#0 Conditions of blacklist (temporary, permanent, until appeal, etc.): 3 weeks villainy blacklist.

This lore has been [Accepted] .. somewhat, these following points have been decided upon; - Wyvern's and Pygmy dragons are accepted. However basilisks and hydras are not, reasoning listed below; 1) Basilisks unfortunately are already accepted lore here. Most likely a mistake, however they're an already present concept. 2) Hydra's are pretty darn powerful. Infact-- They could most likely rival that of a dragon with their.. several heads. - Dragur's influence is removed entirely. Looking back at the Dragur lore it has some contradictions, these currently do not exactly fit within such and thus we're forced to remove his creation of them. I'll place this within quotes atop the post whilst also making minor changes highligting certain factors, it'd also be useful if you could fill out the application for the two accepted concepts here.

The lore has been [Accepted] . I recommend talking to a member of the LT about it's implementation.

I've got some concerns regarding this piece. The main one is its effects when refined and how it attempts to increase the potency of a mages connection as well as the spells he dare commit.. Now, not only is this left rather vague with little definition and therefore making it rather hard to regulate (eg: someone making a dank fireball and blowing up a house, arguably with this lore that's allowed) but its also.. confusing. The void is a realm of existence that intertwines with our own; how come this odd crystal bares properties that strengthen a connection? I'm unsure. I don't really think the taint argument is viable enough either to explain these symptoms. Now we've got the overwhelming issue of pieces such as these; mechanical representation. The drawbacks are heavily reliant upon a system of trust, for example collection and addiction. In reality a player could just say he has a stockpile at home to feed his addiction, only making use of its advantages when it truly benefits him (for instance combat). Its hard to actually ensure that this is moderated.. So.. I'm unsure what can be done upon that end. Hope this helps.

This lore has been [Denied]. Please submit using the new system linked below. https://www.lordofthecraft.net/topic/130056-the-creature-index-new-creature-applications/

This Lore has been denied. Topic moved to Denied Lore forum.

This lore has been [Denied]. Please submit using the new system linked below. https://www.lordofthecraft.net/topic/130056-the-creature-index-new-creature-applications/

Sorry for the delay, two members including myself have been absent and further discussion is required regarding this piece. Expect an answer within the coming days; dependent upon if Kalenz makes a short return.

Sorry for the delay, two members including myself have been absent and further discussion is required regarding this piece. Expect an answer within the coming days; dependent upon if Kalenz makes a short return.

The lore is now [under Review] . Please expect a result within a week or just afterward as the team reviews this piece!

The lore is now [under Review] . Please expect a result within a week or just afterward as the team reviews this piece!

The lore is now [under Review] . We apologize for the wait, this is mainly down to the fact we usually await 5-6 pieces of lore to accumulate before doing another loremag. However occasionally we go '**** its been nearly a month' and do it early. Sorry once again! Expect a response within a week or just afterward.