Completed Requests
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 425 views
-
-
- 2 replies
- 348 views
-
- 2 replies
- 294 views
-
- 2 replies
- 311 views
-
- 2 replies
- 258 views
-
- 2 replies
- 278 views
-
- 2 replies
- 454 views
-
- 2 replies
- 331 views
-
- 2 replies
- 337 views
-
- 2 replies
- 288 views
-
- 2 replies
- 287 views
-
- 2 replies
- 237 views
-
- 2 replies
- 277 views
-
- 2 replies
- 278 views
-
- 2 replies
- 370 views
-
- 2 replies
- 185 views
-
- 2 replies
- 222 views
-
- 2 replies
- 354 views
-
- 2 replies
- 397 views
-
- 2 replies
- 276 views
-
- 3 replies
- 620 views
-
- 3 replies
- 599 views
-
- 2 replies
- 308 views
-
- 2 replies
- 243 views
-
- 2 replies
- 285 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
-
-
-
-
-
The roleplayer's alternative to Stendhal. You can find it live within the Glade-Core.
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
