Completed Requests
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 255 views
-
-
- 3 replies
- 346 views
-
- 3 replies
- 774 views
-
- 2 replies
- 394 views
-
- 2 replies
- 286 views
-
- 2 replies
- 317 views
-
- 2 replies
- 331 views
-
- 2 replies
- 362 views
-
- 2 replies
- 300 views
-
- 2 replies
- 411 views
-
- 2 replies
- 461 views
-
- 2 replies
- 391 views
-
- 2 replies
- 527 views
-
- 2 replies
- 373 views
-
- 2 replies
- 325 views
-
- 2 replies
- 322 views
-
- 2 replies
- 370 views
-
- 2 replies
- 364 views
-
- 2 replies
- 348 views
-
- 2 replies
- 344 views
-
- 2 replies
- 364 views
-
- 2 replies
- 345 views
-
- 2 replies
- 320 views
-
- 3 replies
- 468 views
-
- 2 replies
- 235 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
