Jump to content

Creation Or Evolution? Vote!

 Share


Sykogenic

Creation or Evolution?  

352 members have voted

  1. 1. Creation or Evolution?

    • Creation
      77
    • Evolution
      241
    • Deities
      9
    • Aliens/Unknown Life forms
      25


Recommended Posts

I believe in a mixture of evolution and creation, so I will restrain from voting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just go with Evolution. I believe all the facts have been laid out before by other people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like to think everything was created, then modified itself to fit into its enviroment. (So a mixture of both I suppose.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I challenge a creationist to prove that their diety is real without trying to disprove evolution. With evidence, logic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, let me get this straight. You are saying that because both of the theories cannot be proven or even disproven, it is most rational to believe in something that completely contradicts everything you have ever lived and seen and touched? You have never seen anything "Divine" or "Magical happen. You have seen what everyone else has, but you say it's rational to go with a Divine being.

And by the way, evolution can be proven. I cannot personally prove it, but it can be proven. "God" can also be real. Maybe every time someone has reported that they say an angel, they just say aliens. Maybe God is an alien, and we are an experiment?

The point is: Nobody knows the answer.

To me, it is easier to believe the cold, hard facts. Evolution.

But "God" could easily exist.

I'm sorry, but everything just interlocks so perfectly together that there has to be some higher power behind it. This didn't just happen someday randomly. There HAS to be a conscious being behind it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but everything just interlocks so perfectly together that there has to be some higher power behind it. This didn't just happen someday randomly. There HAS to be a conscious being behind it.

I would like to disagree. Things don't really 'interlock' perfectly. As an example, the human body is just so frail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to disagree. Things don't really 'interlock' perfectly. As an example, the human body is just so frail.

But our intelligence more than makes up for it. We've been the apex predator in all ecosystems for thousands of years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But our intelligence more than makes up for it. We've been the apex predator in all ecosystems for thousands of years.

That's evolution for you. We didn't evolve to be physically better then everything, we evolved to be mentally better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's evolution for you. We didn't evolve to be physically better then everything, we evolved to be mentally better.

Exactly, something makes us different. We humans are almost the only species that has evolved a huge amount of intelligence and almost no muscle, in comparison to other species.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly, something makes us different. We humans are almost the only species that has evolved a huge amount of intelligence and almost no muscle, in comparison to other species.

Other species are showing signs of intellectual development.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I say we evolved. BUT, we evolved in a different way than the "Official" one. It has been analyzed and concluded that other supposed "previous links" of human evolution actually lived around the same time. This means they were not different steps in evolution, but different types of humans, all co-existing with each other at some point.

I also think we are devolving, rather than evolving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I challenge a creationist to prove that their diety is real without trying to disprove evolution. With evidence, logic.

If you challenge that, then I challenge you to find some form of evidence that 100% proves that they don't exist, and don't use the 'I don't have to prove it, only disprove that it exists!' excuse of every athiest I have come across. :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

the·o·ry   [thee-uh-ree, theer-ee]

noun, plural the·o·ries.

1.

a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity. Synonyms: principle, law, doctrine.

Until someone comes up with a better theory and show basic evidence behind it evolution it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...