-
Posts
447 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Status Replies posted by ferdaboy
-
why care theyre unpaid
-
It is rare for someone to play a character of intentional low intelligence. Which player-character do you think did it best?
-
@indiana105plays a fleshed out and well thought out low intelligence char as his current king
-
-
changed my mind I understand why ppl hate CRP lock now lol
-
Which LOTC bloodline is most famous and/or recognizable?
-
Quebec deserves to be its own country, that's facts.
-
another thread derailed. we cant get anything done around here.
@Werew0lf save us -
another thread derailed. we cant get anything done around here.
@Werew0lf save us -
another thread derailed. we cant get anything done around here.
@Werew0lf save us -
another thread derailed. we cant get anything done around here.
@Werew0lf save us -
another thread derailed. we cant get anything done around here.
@Werew0lf save us -
How hilarious it is to change the rules on ban reports all of a sudden. LMAO
-
unfortunate timing i guess
for a few weeks now i've had people need help writing reports, which I don't mind doing, but i imagined that if it happens quite often then its commonplace amongst the community to be misinformed
just right here is an example as to why the PSA was needed
@rukio was never made aware it was broken for some, if this link dosent work dm me
-
-
How hilarious it is to change the rules on ban reports all of a sudden. LMAO
-
How hilarious it is to change the rules on ban reports all of a sudden. LMAO
-
hilarious
-
hilarious
-
it really irks me when people rip media 1 to 1 for lotc, not even changing names, be original you freakazoids
-
Constructs/NPC fighting tools (i.e. NPC homunculi/necromancer constructs) should count towards raid count when raiding :3c
-
Constructs/NPC fighting tools (i.e. NPC homunculi/necromancer constructs) should count towards raid count when raiding :3c
-
real recognizes real. fire rep farm. wp.
-
for those of you that wanted to know about the results of the report, there were no bans. every single person (everyone, including myself) was just given a warning.
it's odd seeing the lack of transparency from moderation on the verdict of a public report, and disappointing that despite the amount of evidence, the verdict is just a blanket warning -
for those of you that wanted to know about the results of the report, there were no bans. every single person (everyone, including myself) was just given a warning.
it's odd seeing the lack of transparency from moderation on the verdict of a public report, and disappointing that despite the amount of evidence, the verdict is just a blanket warning -
for those of you that wanted to know about the results of the report, there were no bans. every single person (everyone, including myself) was just given a warning.
it's odd seeing the lack of transparency from moderation on the verdict of a public report, and disappointing that despite the amount of evidence, the verdict is just a blanket warning