Wizzar

The assumption that Panashea is trying to be sneaky here or make Ologs strong for his own personal use is simply false. That being said, their strongest attacks are that with the force of a warhammer. This does not seem so OP to me considering every knight I've encountered is fully adorned in plate armor w/ a warhammer that is enchanted or powered by X deity. I am not against giving them more drawbacks, but the current meme state of Ologs needs change.

What about the server keeps you logging in every week? If you were to give one piece of advice to a new player, what would it be? Also, goblin or uruk?

I do not think the question should be whether the banned user deserves transparency. Rather, I think the community would benefit from transparency. This should be the focus of the debate.

An erratic goblin delivers the latest edition of the Kaktuz Weekli to Ghuun as he wanders across the lands of Norland. "Grizh-hul, Grizh-hun" he rumbles, before placing it into his travel sack, continuing on through new lands.

Ghuun receives the weekly issue from a snickering goblin, reading it with delight "Grizihubu!" he exclaims "Now this ahm wub mi ahm blahing about".

Clan Akaal - Not really a coat of arms but still the winner.

"Lots of talk of eating with these folk" he mutters, wandering through those Silver Forests, having fallen from the path a few years back "I wonder if a wizard as powerful as I would be eligible for such a motivated team!"

Sorry - Shamanism is frozen. +1

Wondering how many people chose Naztherak because demons are bad.

There are a few things that I think should be recognized: 1. We are on a minecraft roleplay server. 2. We are all trying to have fun here. (emphasis on "trying") 3. Selective enforcement of vague rules will almost always feel targeted, especially when the community is small and interconnected. I agree with those that say CAs have consequences, and CA holders should be ready to face those consequences. That being said, I think we often double down on these types of punishments purely for the sake of argument or proving a point. What I think is the issue is that ST could have so easily ruled the other way. What harm would it have caused for ST to give a warning? For ST to have sent the druids in question a message saying - "Please do Y or X will be your consequence". Obviously, nothing requires ST to behave in the aforementioned way BUT I think there were many ways to handle this that were more amicable in nature. That showed that ST are here to work with and promote fun in the community. TLDR: ST could have handled this better. Lets promote fun. It was not important for the community to force PK these players, it was a deliberate interpretation of the rules for an outcome (whether ST desired it or not). I HAVE NO SKIN IN THIS GAME I JUST LIKE TYPING

I don’t think any of these are the “right” answer. Activity stems from those OOC communities that we build. Many players will get involved in any of these types of RP so long as they have a community they enjoy participating in.