tcs_tonsils_ 2829 Share Posted March 9, 2022 AULIC COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF HANSETI-RUSKA Krawn z. Ringo 11th of Msitza and Dargund, 415 E.S. Jovenaars Firr Iulius Vernhart Prosecution Johann Barclay Defense Ringo Testimonies THE FOLLOWING CHARGES WERE BROUGHT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT; V Let he who attempts or conspires to commit a crime be guilty of Attempt, to be punished as if they had committed the crime itself. VIII Let he who harms another outside of battle be guilty of Assault. XIV Let he who defaces the property of another be guilty of Vandalism. XVII Let he who aids criminals and frustrates justice be guilty of Obstruction. (Jura I Kirma) THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS WERE BROUGHT BY THE DEFENDANT; The defendant, Firr Ringo, admits guilt to all crimes proposed.. THE FOLLOWING IS THE RATIONALE FOR THE DECISION FROM THE PRESIDING JOVENAAR; Jovenaar Iulius delivered the opinion of the court on the topic of guilt: The defendant is found guilty for all charges claimed. - Attempt (Murder), Assault, Vandalism, Obstruction of Justice - Jovenaar Iulius delivered the opinion of the court on the topic of punishment: The defendant, Firr Ringo, was to be burned at the stake for the act of Arsony against both the church and against the people of Haense. It is so ordered. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts