[✗] [Fjarriagua Amendment] Bleeding

[satinkira 6046]

OLD

 

- A Fjarriagua’s skin slightly cracks instead of being cut, though this does not mean that they are more resistant or weaker to any forms weaponry, and can still be sliced, cut, and stabbed. Their blood and saliva are like sludge and moves very slowly, pouring out of them when they are damaged whether in or out of their disguise.  Minor cuts and scrapes no deeper than 5 centimeters would only appear akin to that of descendants in terms of blood flow. Anything more severe would start to reveal cracks and a darker, slushie-like liquid.

 

NEW

 

- A Fjarriagua’s skin slightly cracks instead of being cut, though this does not mean that they are more resistant or weaker to any forms weaponry, and can still be sliced, cut, and stabbed. Their blood and saliva are like sludge and moves very slowly, pouring out of them when they are damaged whether in or out of their disguise. Cuts would reveal cracks and a darker, slushie-like liquid.

 

REASONING

I noted this inconsistency earlier today, when looking through the lore - how could it be that cuts in the arm, at first, bled as normal, if the blood was darker and slushy? It seemed inconsistent, so I spoke to some Fjarriagua players, who said that it was a contradiction that was written in to combat the hyper-vigilant testing nature of places like Minitz and Haelun'or. 

To me, one or two overly zealous nations isn't a good enough reason to ignore a contradiction in lore - Fjarriagua should fear these places regardless, because of how stringent and devout they are.

TLDR; fixing a contradiction in lore.

[TheBigBubbles 713]

Right as I PK my witch lmao.

[Diogen 3110]

21 minutes ago, satinkira said:

so I spoke to some Fjarriagua players

??????

 

Please dont push random amendments written up in the spur of the moment without contacting its community / leadership, especially as a non-Fjarriagua player

 

ST amended that line to fix our CA some time ago and reverting it should NOT be the way to go

[ReveredOwl 5352]

Writing/changing the lore to avoid methods that players have discovered to reveal you is rather poor faith tbh, writing the lore to be purposefully contradictory to avoid methods of detection (discovered through rp) is dumb

[Diogen 3110]

there r many simple ways of figuring out a fjarriagua, but forcing a vampire test on a non vampire ca is not the way to go

There should be proper rp to find out a darkspawn and not just cheesing slicing people’s arms in “random” tests

[ReveredOwl 5352]

1 minute ago, Diogen said:

there r many simple ways of figuring out a fjarriagua, but forcing a vampire test on a non vampire ca is not the way to go

Its not just vampire test, your blood is described as being slushy and blue, there is no reason why it would not be like this when cut, other than to purposefully avoid methods of detection. Changing your lore once these methods of detection are discovered is very bad faith, you say there are simple ways of discovering a frost witch, how long is it until these ways are also removed once they are discovered in rp too?

[Diogen 3110]

“changing lore” no bro its been st verdict for years but then got put on paper recent-ish

the other ways r already discovered and lore hasn’t been changed. there’s just a problem against cheesing discovering a darkspawn type thats so heavy on hiding amongst people

[Turbo_Dog 1491]

My frost witch white knight <3

[Netphreak 468]

No, was not asked for by the FW to community to amend, was not needed by the FW community to justify amending, spoke with ONE other witch before posting amendment proposal. The community doesn't want this. 

[ReveredOwl 5352]

46 minutes ago, Diogen said:

“changing lore” no bro its been st verdict for years but then got put on paper recent-ish

the other ways r already discovered and lore hasn’t been changed. there’s just a problem against cheesing discovering a darkspawn type thats so heavy on hiding amongst people

ok ur rp is good so invalidate all others, people discovered your weakness in rp, its incredibly bad faith to then remove that and just say people are just cheesing the rp when thats not the case, the frost witch community don't want this because it would mean hiding much better, your disguises shouldn't be just to rp your normal woman noble character with a quirk and instead used to slither in and lure people out, the same with all other 'disguises'

Edited April 28 by ReveredOwl

[Netphreak 468]

2 minutes ago, ReveredOwl said:

ok ur rp is good so invalidate all others, people discovered your weakness in rp, its incredibly bad faith to then remove that and just say people are just cheesing the rp when thats not the case, the frost witch community don't want this because it would mean hiding much better, your disguises shouldn't be just to rp your normal woman noble character with a quirk and instead used to slither in and lure people out, the same with all other 'disguises'

Take your OOC vendetta elsewhere Owl. With every single FW post, amendment or proposal you have creeped in like a dog begging for scraps. Dio is not well so leave him alone. Once he's better, he'll respond to you; maybe. 

[ReveredOwl 5352]

7 minutes ago, Netphreak said:

Take your OOC vendetta elsewhere Owl. With every single FW post, amendment or proposal you have creeped in like a dog begging for scraps. Dio is not well so leave him alone. Once he's better, he'll respond to you; maybe. 

There is no ooc vendetta, targetting or victim here so I am unsure why you frame it at such. I am of the same opinion as vampyres trying to write lore to remove salt as a weakness after it was discovered through rp. I responded to Dio's comments... I am confused why you are making it out as if I am harassing them when they are sick when that is not the case

[satinkira 6046]

 

sorry chaps my bad

[Pancho 2574]

5cm is way too deep for a "minor bruise or scrape." Should be something like 3 imo. Though I do see how this can be used for heavy meta.

[Digit_005 251]

1 hour ago, Pancho said:

5cm is way too deep for a "minor bruise or scrape." Should be something like 3 imo. Though I do see how this can be used for heavy meta.

It really is too deep to be anything minor. Converting 5cm to inches, that’s an almost 2-inch* deep wound.
 

*5cm is equal to 1.969 inches