Proclamation Of Peace

[Roderick Greymane / Vegas 219]

Mayirr counts up all the minas she has earned from selling weaponry this last year. War rarely changes. And it makes her a nether-lot of money, so she is slightly saddened to hear this proclamation of peace.

 

 

((It is against the rules to play someone else's characters. You've been told this already. ))

((I call BS to that Freya, handing over rights to characters has been going on for a long time on this server, FM's, GM's, even Admin's have allowed different players to switch through characters, for example, Alice Silverblade was revoked from Pillan because she lost the privilege of using the character under Braxis. Another example is Zezimus gave rights to use Lucius Blackmont to Pheonixpro1 when he decided he'd rather not play the character anymore. So I'd like to see where in the rules it states that you can't transfer rights of playing a character to another.))

[no longer active 734]

*Mili sits in the Dreadfort and wonders how it was taken without soldiers taking it. He then gets ready for a fight and sends off some birds*

[Will (TauFirewarrior) 2466]

*Mili sits in the Dreadfort and wonders how it was taken without soldiers taking it. He then gets ready for a fight and sends off some birds*

Hasn't taken it, just prematurely claimed victory due to his ego being incredibly large 

[IrishPerson 693]

((I call BS to that Freya, handing over rights to characters has been going on for a long time on this server, FM's, GM's, even Admin's have allowed different players to switch through characters, for example, Alice Silverblade was revoked from Pillan because she lost the privilege of using the character under Braxis. Another example is Zezimus gave rights to use Lucius Blackmont to Pheonixpro1 when he decided he'd rather not play the character anymore. So I'd like to see where in the rules it states that you can't transfer rights of playing a character to another.))

((

 

Firstly Alice Silverblade was taken from Pillan as she was roleplaying the character in a manner that was not suited to the lore that was set for her. Such is within the rules if stated on the tread where said person applied for the character. Braxis stated it on the House Silverblade tread. Zezimus giving PP1 the rights to play his character was in fact againest the rules. And to my knowledge he was only allowed to play him for a while in order to get Flay back in shape before handing the lordship to another. I know this was PP1's plan too. Lastly I thought I would be so kind to show you the rule:

 

• You can't play another person's character! Even if another player's banned and they can't get on, you still can't play them! Their character is theirs only!

There is the rule, look for yourself if it pleases you. Last rule on the Server rules page. Link:

 

http://www.lordofthecraft.net/index.php?/info/rules

 

While there I suggest reading them all as you clearly do not know them. Just a friendly reminder! :D

))

[Kickstarted and Running 965]

Nero sits with his cousin William, having a picnic

[Roderick Greymane / Vegas 219]

((

 

Firstly Alice Silverblade was taken from Pillan as she was roleplaying the character in a manner that was not suited to the lore that was set for her. Such is within the rules if stated on the tread where said person applied for the character. Braxis stated it on the House Silverblade tread. Zezimus giving PP1 the rights to play his character was in fact againest the rules. And to my knowledge he was only allowed to play him for a while in order to get Flay back in shape before handing the lordship to another. I know this was PP1's plan too. Lastly I thought I would be so kind to show you the rule:

 

• You can't play another person's character! Even if another player's banned and they can't get on, you still can't play them! Their character is theirs only!

There is the rule, look for yourself if it pleases you. Last rule on the Server rules page. Link:

 

http://www.lordofthecraft.net/index.php?/info/rules

 

While there I suggest reading them all as you clearly do not know them. Just a friendly reminder! :D

))

((Actually, that's quite funny MrGreene, as I read them about 15 minutes ago, and took a gyazo of them, because I had a very strange feeling that the rules would be changed :P Here are some gyazo's of the original rules that seem to have been changed in the last 5 minutes. :) http://gyazo.com/09a302014ff7bfeddaf0bb7359e813a7 http://gyazo.com/4d7c240f2a51b6b527ed4ff97ddd5c90 It's really funny how the staff go and change the rules whenever they want to make sure they are right, when clearly they were wrong before. I'm glad I caught the lie before they were able to cover it up. :P It's kind of sad though, that whoever just changed the rules did that. It's really a bad image for the server's staff if they go and lie about the rules like that.))

[IrishPerson 693]

((Actually, that's quite funny MrGreene, as I read them about 15 minutes ago, and took a gyazo of them, because I had a very strange feeling that the rules would be changed :P Here are some gyazo's of the original rules that seem to have been changed in the last 5 minutes. :) http://gyazo.com/09a302014ff7bfeddaf0bb7359e813a7 http://gyazo.com/4d7c240f2a51b6b527ed4ff97ddd5c90 It's really funny how the staff go and change the rules whenever they want to make sure they are right, when clearly they were wrong before. I'm glad I caught the lie before they were able to cover it up. :P It's kind of sad though, that whoever just changed the rules did that. It's really a bad image for the server's staff if they go and lie about the rules like that.))

(( Sadly a gyazo does not tell the time of which the screen was taken thus one could have taken this a long time ago, not saying you have, however it is possible. Now one must also note that the HTML of a webpage can be edited with ease thus one can remove the rule stating such then take a screen. Not saying you did any of these however it is possible. None of us know if it is truth or lie but the GMs and Admins themselves. Alas this does not matter as it is in the rules now. ))

[youlovesocks 652]

(( Sadly a gyazo does not tell the time of which the screen was taken thus one could have taken this a long time ago, not saying you have, however it is possible. Now one must also note that the HTML of a webpage can be edited with ease thus one can remove the rule stating such then take a screen. Not saying you did any of these however it is possible. None of us know if it is truth or lie but the GMs and Admins themselves. Alas this does not matter as it is in the rules now. ))

(( You can't accept that the GM's are defending you by changing the rules in order to prove us wrong and subsequently destroy the Flays? I'm not surprised, really. Look at the forum texture, wait.. no... simply don't be an ignorant fool. ))

[Roderick Greymane / Vegas 219]

(( Sadly a gyazo does not tell the time of which the screen was taken thus one could have taken this a long time ago, not saying you have, however it is possible. Now one must also note that the HTML of a webpage can be edited with ease thus one can remove the rule stating such then take a screen. Not saying you did any of these however it is possible. None of us know if it is truth or lie but the GMs and Admins themselves. Alas this does not matter as it is in the rules now. ))

((That's very true, I just have my word against the staff, which now seem to me as a group of liars. To go and change the rules over something like this and then claim that it was in the rules the whole time, is in my opinion and of many others, a complete and utter insult to the player base. Also, I'd like to see the logs of them changing the rules, as it should save them, so we can see exactly when this new 'rule' was added.))

[IrishPerson 693]

(( You can't accept that the GM's are defending you by changing the rules in order to prove us wrong and subsequently destroy the Flays? I'm not surprised, really. Look at the forum texture, wait.. no... simply don't be an ignorant fool. ))

(( Who said I cannot accept it? I am merely stating that anything could be possible.  And trust me when I say that insulting me, is not going to help anyone in this situation.

 

As for you Charles, I would also like to see the log if such is possible. ))

[Zezimus 1523]

((Zezimus giving PP1 the rights to play his character was in fact againest the rules.))

 

((Erm, though you're correct about the fact that this was only for a certain period of time, I don't believe this was ever stated to be against the rules. I can remember multiple occasions where this was done before. Alice Silverblade was not originally played by Pillan for example. Likewise, Karl Frostbeard was not originally played by Arteh. 

 

Please do not accuse me of breaking rules, AFTER they were posted.))

[IrishPerson 693]

((Erm, though you're correct about the fact that this was only for a certain period of time, I don't believe this was ever stated to be against the rules. I can remember multiple occasions where this was done before. Alice Silverblade was not originally played by Pillan for example. Likewise, Karl Frostbeard was not originally played by Arteh. 

 

Please do not accuse me of breaking rules, AFTER they were posted.))

(( My apologies, Zezimus. I had not known that it was not in the rules then but rather could of possible been added as of late. ))

[Neri 3590]

((

Sharing characters has always been against the rules, but it was an unspoken one and I see the errors of our ways. From this day forward, sharing characters is now against the rules, except in dire circumstances. Please do not accuse us of being biased or liars, we did not aim or create this rule just to personally damage X or Y group.

))

[Cat Evocation 3728]

((Some one close this topic already, Its become an OOC Debate Fit. Take it some where else guys, Seriously.))

[Respiren 524]

((That's very true, I just have my word against the staff, which now seem to me as a group of liars. To go and change the rules over something like this and then claim that it was in the rules the whole time, is in my opinion and of many others, a complete and utter insult to the player base. Also, I'd like to see the logs of them changing the rules, as it should save them, so we can see exactly when this new 'rule' was added.))

 

[[Hello everybody!

So much derailing of roleplay with unnecessary OOC arguments, not much has changed there!

 

You're missing the point charles - 'Rules' are never set in stone. If the GM's ask players not to do something because it is causing problems, it's not an argument. It's what they consider best or necessary in their judgement to avoid problems & maintain roleplay  - and you should learn respect that.

Because a roleplay community needs that level of player and staff cooperation to function.

Amusingly, this situation is all very reminiscent to me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rtkdo7bOmJc

 

Your complaint about dishonesty and collecting chat logs, a group named 'Flay' going out of their way to cause strife for amusement, players defying simple requests from GM's claiming they are being persecuted. If everyone really wants peace, you simply need to put a stop creating conflict for amusement and be rid of those that cannot.

Remember how you were 'permanenly' banned by myself over a similar issue, you could have followed a very simple request which amounted to 'don't metagame, and please leave this player alone' which I thought perfectly reasonable - but instead you chose to be defiant, argue, seek other admins, collect logs etc etc

Your and others continued presence on LotC considering your 'permanent ban' and continued behaviour seems rather generous to me. I'd think you are tempting them to reconsider that judgement. ; )

 

Or as Lennon said from his bed "The War is over, if you want it" ]]