ski_king3

Accepted.

This lore will remain in pending, so you may make changes in the next two weeks. If it is not ready to be reviewed again at that time, it will be denied. There are contradictions between this piece and voidal horror lore. Likewise, it doesn't make sense for them to be immune to voidal magic when voidal horrors are susceptible to voidal magics. Likewise, players shouldn't be able to make them, or probably have them generally. They could make a good event creature, potentially. Work on the origins some more, we would suggest.

This lore requires changes, and will remain pending for two weeks. If it does not receive necessary edits for a secondary review by then, it will be denied. We really like making ents ET only. That being said, entlings should be weakened. Also, there is an issue saying that lore holders would get control of existing ents in some way, as lore holders are merely knowledgeable representatives on pieces of lore, and do not hold any power over lore pieces. Some felt it a bit odd that ents would be player-made, ET-played creatures, something we had an issue with when a similar clause was included in a MArt. Some felt that making entlings autonomous was a problem, and that a proper balance would be removing their autonomy but shortening the summoning time.

This lore has been denied. While not everyone was a huge fan of this lore, it is better suited for our Creature Index. Please submit it there instead.

This lore has been denied. There were a fair few issues with this one. One of the big ones is that an apparition couldn't really overpower an Aengul. Likewise, the idea that lore could be written to confirm an ICly developed religion was seen to be problematic by some, especially when other attempts to do so for humans have been denied in the past. The magic also lacks proper limitations and seems a bit OP, and would need to be defined better across the board. Apparitions wouldn't realistically be capable of granting many if any of these powers listed. There aren't a whole lot of weaknesses, either. If I were to make a suggestion, I would rewrite this involving some opportunistic Aengul or Daemon (which you might have to introduce) utilizing the existing Norlandic religion to its own ends, pretending to be the All-Father for its own benefit. This, paired with a more balanced set of abilities, and the opportunity for this opportunistic deity to find others who might utilize its gifts as well, could potentially prove to be an acceptable piece of magic lore that still suits your needs.

This lore has been denied. The taint wasn't well defined. The weaknesses were not defined. Some felt using dead flesh to create parasites and other things was problematic. Some felt it was bland and didn't offer much. It essentially seems like an afflicted rewrite with aspects of necromancy or dark shamanism added. Parts of the team are not averse to an afflicted rewrite, but not this one. Also, it seems to directly take something from the Berserk canon. http://evil.wikia.com/wiki/Behelit

This lore has been denied. It was deemed problematic that elementalists could suddenly purge all spectrals, especially without any real reasoning for why that makes sense being given. Also, while this might just be odd wording, the lore seems to imply that all dark arts comes from the font. It's cryptically worded, and seems to intend to sneak in things. Likewise, an object like this could be submitted as a MArt.

This lore has been denied. There are several issues present here. For one, the addition of healing has been seen as an issue. Dropping to tier one after a week of inactivity is also problematic. There are some other buffs seemingly snuck in as well, including T5s not needing a puppet to cast, letting Archons use it, etc. Multiple connections to a single puppet was also raised as an issue. All in all, the piece was a bit difficult to follow, somewhat inconsistent, and gave the magic too many abilities.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week. Verdict: Pending - We feel that this race would best serve as an ET race as opposed to a CA race. Edit: Accepted as an et race.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

Under review, expect a verdict in about a week.

This doesn't address all the issues the LT/MT had with the magic (admittedly a stupid long time ago), but it's definitely an improvement. Glad to see it up there!

How dare you try to nerf my magic?!?!?!?!?!

Most groups that go for this sorta thing do it poorly. If you were really true to this, then it could possibly go well.