Feedback Meetings

[iris1612 1780]

40 minutes ago, Wrynny said:

If you look at most of the recent feedback posts, they've all been given a response

       

ok

 

[Salvo 1852]

Just now, Wrynny said:

 

Yeah... These are all Developer issues, that they have to handle. I only organise and respond to feedback that is directed towards Admins/GMs, and sadly I can't give you guys a response for these ones. I'm sorry that they haven't been answered but all I can do is try to encourage the dev team to answer them. I'll try and get you guys a response on them, and once again like I said I'm sorry they haven't been answered.

 

Which is why you're not being held responsible for anything. You are one of the few people that I have actually witnessed doing something. At least you're trying. :)

 

This is a massive problem that has been raised multiple times, that of the Admins/Developers not listening to the Community for the most part, and GMs/lower staff team members not being able to do anything about it.

[Wrynn 1349]

58 minutes ago, MaxGemini said:

       

ok

 

That post is being awaited a response by Pandann, as he commented on the post saying he'd be responding to it.

[Shalashask 1112]

9 minutes ago, Wrynny said:

Yeah... These are all Developer issues, that they have to handle. I only organise and respond to feedback that is directed towards Admins/GMs, and sadly I can't give you guys a response for these ones. I'm sorry that they haven't been answered but all I can do is try to encourage the dev team to answer them. I'll try and get you guys a response on them, and once again like I said I'm sorry they haven't been answered.

But this is my point. The devs shouldn't be making these decisions. I thought it would be up to the GMs and admins to decide what is changed and then instruct the devs on what they need to work on. 

[TeaLulu 1783]

Just now, Shalashask said:

But this is my point. The devs shouldn't be making these decisions. I thought it would be up to the GMs and admins to decide what is changed and then instruct the devs on what they need to work on. 

I don't think its as much about the decision as it is the fact the Devs have to do all the work to implement those decisions.

[Viscen 356]

Moderate the forums more please I'm sick of seeing the ROLEPLAY post section cluttered with ****-tier mlg pvp videos and autistic shitposting 

 

and punish **** rp and immersion breaking that seems to occur everywhere on a daily basis feels like a factions lite rp server (except both the rp and pvp are utter **** so there's no saving grace) 

[Wrynn 1349]

1 hour ago, Viscen said:

Moderate the forums more please I'm sick of seeing the ROLEPLAY post section cluttered with ****-tier mlg pvp videos and autistic shitposting 

 

and punish **** rp and immersion breaking that seems to occur everywhere on a daily basis feels like a factions lite rp server (except both the rp and pvp are utter **** so there's no saving grace) 

I mean, that's what the post is about. If you make a formal feedback thread about it - I'll make sure that the staff team discuss the issues that you've raised.

[Achilles 892]

Doesn't it feel weird we see more application posts than actual RP posts on the forums nowadays? Or has it always been like that. I can hardly remember.

 

 

Is there anyway we can remove application posts from the Topics list. Keep it to RP posts/ Important stuff?

[Man of Respect 5471]

Will katanas be implemented with a dual-wielding plugin on lotc?

[Wrynn 1349]

58 minutes ago, Man of respect said:

Will katanas be implemented with a dual-wielding plugin on lotc?

done.

[Birdnerdy 1539]

33 minutes ago, Wrynny said:

 

Yeah... These are all Developer issues, that they have to handle. I only organise and respond to feedback that is directed towards Admins/GMs, and sadly I can't give you guys a response for these ones. I'm sorry that they haven't been answered but all I can do is try to encourage the dev team to answer them. I'll try and get you guys a response on them, and once again like I said I'm sorry they haven't been answered.

The Admin/GM team should not be held to the whim of the tech team. The issues presented have an impact that reaches beyond just the tech aspect of the server, and the decision to implement/remove the ideas presented by the players should ultimately be decided by the admin/GM teams, not by people like Jistuma and 501warhead.

[Dragonslayerelf 654]

3 hours ago, Jonificus said:

Nice joke, but I don't have any issues with the language itself, more so trying to add up the words to make a meaningful sentence without sounding like a stereotypical nord with poor engelsk skills. There's a reason I'm fond of rants, no need to be formal.

You try your best; the meaning tends to get across

[SpodoKaiba 612]

For 5.0 at least, something to encourage road RP would be nice. 

[Papa Liam 960]

38 minutes ago, Spoduminister said:

For 5.0 at least, something to encourage road RP would be nice. 

 

We could always do that by removing fast travels :^)

 

That might be a serious suggestion. 

[KBR 2046]

I have to agree with what the others are saying, the techies should not be holding the admins by the balls simply because they are unwilling to make a change. I understand them doing that if it was some impossible feat of coding, but removing the nexus and such shouldn't be that hard, in my eyes anyways. 

What I think needs to be changed. 1.9 pvp, I think 501 asked for opinions, don't really remember, but the mechanics seemed good at first but now I think more and more people are realizing how stupid they are.  Make pvp great again.