Why was I banned? [HBRules]

[Chorale__ 2147]

Alright, So I just returned to my computer from a quick breakfast, and I get a prompt, saying "No RPing a horse, lying about paying back for it and then lying to a moderator. 3 weeks with appeal. -HB"

 

https://gyazo.com/d2eed21144e0543785532602611b58f5

 

I'd like some solid evidence that I killed a horse, Please. Recently, I've not killed a horse, but had MANY of mine killed. Also, Tahmas - Or any other administrators, if you could please contact me in DM's - That'd be grand.

Thanks!

 

I do plan on making an appeal, Depending on what the administrators have to say about HB's banning a player, with no solid evidence, Or providing the player ANY evidence, infact.

[FlemishSupremacy 6115]

"Recently" You have indeed not killed a horse recently, as you've been stalling paying me those 600 minas back for 3 months. Then, when a GM tries to force you to pay up, you, in an absolutely ridiculous manner, that you didn't do any of this. 

[Chorale__ 2147]

20 minutes ago, TheElvenMage said:

"Recently" You have indeed not killed a horse recently, as you've been stalling paying me those 600 minas back for 3 months. Then, when a GM tries to force you to pay up, you, in an absolutely ridiculous manner, that you didn't do any of this. 

Paying you back 600 minas for a horse that I supposedley killed 3 months ago... Hrm, Shouldn't I have been banned 3 months ago when I 'killed' the horse in the first place? 

 

Seems like a very unwell thought out scam to me, However - If I killed a horse 3 months ago, Do you not agree that the moderator should've banned me right then, when he/she/they looked at the logs? I think so. This proves that your thesis is incorrect. And, As i've had about 3 horses killed in the last month, All 3 of those occurances happened with 1. The GM pulling the logs, 2. The GM telling me who killed it, 3. The GM banning the person right then, not 3 months after - But right then. 

 

Now then, Do you see where I'm getting at?

[lev 627]

*Shinraidekiru

[Jentos 9425]

Banned... For a ******* mineman pvp horsie? Elven, leave my bro alone. The moderator should have done this a while ago, is a ban REALLY necessary? A GM once killed my horse by accident, and a ******* fast one, I believe I didn't even complain. This is fucked up, really fucked up. #TargetBan

 

get over it people. 

[FlemishSupremacy 6115]

29 minutes ago, Chorale_ said:

Paying you back 600 minas for a horse that I supposedley killed 3 months ago... Hrm, Shouldn't I have been banned 3 months ago when I 'killed' the horse in the first place? 

 

Seems like a very unwell thought out scam to me, However - If I killed a horse 3 months ago, Do you not agree that the moderator should've banned me right then, when he/she/they looked at the logs? I think so. This proves that your thesis is incorrect. And, As i've had about 3 horses killed in the last month, All 3 of those occurances happened with 1. The GM pulling the logs, 2. The GM telling me who killed it, 3. The GM banning the person right then, not 3 months after - But right then. 

The only reason you weren't banned back then is because you promised to pay me the horse. Now you're abusing Wrynn (The GM that handled the situation back then)'s innactivity to try and lie your way out. 

[Runabarn 1028]

You really think this is about the horse?

[Chorale__ 2147]

13 minutes ago, TheElvenMage said:

The only reason you weren't banned back then is because you promised to pay me the horse. Now you're abusing Wrynn (The GM that handled the situation back then)'s innactivity to try and lie your way out. 

I'm sure we can find some way to get ahold of Wrynn, or someone else can. Until then, I'm asking for proper proof.

[HedgeHug 2049]

Any FM / GM feel free to hide this message but I'd like to state the following:

 

In a past issue me and a bunch of people raided the Caliphate in Vailor. Two rather new players locked Lockez in the gate building through OOC mechanics without pvp being instagated. The lava trap killed his aengelic bred 600 minas horse.

 

The players were not killed, as Lockez simply said: I will tell the GM not to ban you if you pay me the minas and be done with it.

 

Minas were paid nobody was banned. Thus it is in his right not to immediately ban him after the issue took place and give the player the time to pay up. However, 3 months later, no payment? A ban is justified.

[Chorale__ 2147]

17 minutes ago, TheElvenMage said:

The only reason you weren't banned back then is because you promised to pay me the horse. Now you're abusing Wrynn (The GM that handled the situation back then)'s innactivity to try and lie your way out. 

Another thing, I'm sure that the GM's logs might be able to go back that far if they were willing. I'm not sure however.

 

[Harri 4815]

1 hour ago, Chorale_ said:

Paying you back 600 minas for a horse that I supposedley killed 3 months ago... Hrm, Shouldn't I have been banned 3 months ago when I 'killed' the horse in the first place? 

 

Seems like a very unwell thought out scam to me, However - If I killed a horse 3 months ago, Do you not agree that the moderator should've banned me right then, when he/she/they looked at the logs? I think so. This proves that your thesis is incorrect. And, As i've had about 3 horses killed in the last month, All 3 of those occurances happened with 1. The GM pulling the logs, 2. The GM telling me who killed it, 3. The GM banning the person right then, not 3 months after - But right then. 

 

Now then, Do you see where I'm getting at?

I'm sure if I banned you on the spot you would be arguing that you could've payed for it instead lol.

 

I distinctly remember you telling me you would pay for the horse instead of taking a ban. I never was able to finish persuing you as I quit GM for a bit. Also, quit calling me lad, mate, kid, friend, or any other passive aggressive little condescending name.

 

You're to remain banned.

[Weabootrash 412]

savage

[Chorale__ 2147]

 

15 minutes ago, HB_ said:

I distinctly remember you telling me you would pay for the horse instead of taking a ban.

When did this take place, I ask? TheElvenMage claims that Wrynn handled such 'situation' that supposedly occured.

[CheekyNolan 5420]

Go down with dignity 

[Chorale__ 2147]

1 hour ago, HB_ said:

persuing

pursuing *