I Am Green and I choose for you.

[Tav 4336]

2 minutes ago, Gladuos said:

There's a reason for that (you are looking at my old account too)

Also, as if you must be active to hold an opinion. Just shut up, idiot.

How's the ST taste btw?

bro couldn't choose which remark to use so he just put both LOL

[MaplTree 129]

I do want to point out that the characters that were PK'd have been rped in the past week. There is no RP reason for their deaths, its just POOF THEY DEAD. Absolutely horrible decision for an rp server and it completely wrecks any good rp coming from this shitfest.

[Random 1690]

18 minutes ago, MysticalWeasel said:

yo cool image, who made that 😳

[Wizry 1218]

1 minute ago, Hiccup392 said:

however. stop putting your lifelines in your backyard, kitchens, and closets. 

no.

my soul is here: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500

[MysticalWeasel 910]

1 minute ago, Random said:

yo cool image, who made that 😳

Uhmmm… no one 🤫🤫🤫🤫

[Random 1690]

Just now, MysticalWeasel said:

Uhmmm… no one 🤫🤫🤫🤫

Count your days.

[PolarLoLs 984]

Just now, MaplTree said:

I do want to point out that the characters that were PK'd have been rped in the past week. There is no RP reason for their deaths, its just POOF THEY DEAD. Absolutely horrible decision for an rp server and it completely wrecks any good rp coming from this shitfest.

 Whats your point so i can debate it clearly (/srs)

We cannot be serious bro @Chuuwys@MaplTree

Some accountability has to be taken, You lot put yourselves in this position and posting in forum statuses instead of interacting with the post itself is bunz

[truelarper 593]

7 minutes ago, MaplTree said:

I do want to point out that the characters that were PK'd have been rped in the past week. There is no RP reason for their deaths, its just POOF THEY DEAD. Absolutely horrible decision for an rp server and it completely wrecks any good rp coming from this shitfest.

calm down youre not speaking rationally

[PolarLoLs 984]

@MaplTree

[_Leyd 1010]

Here before the lock 😍🤞🏾

[Phersades 1710]

11 minutes ago, Lunan_EXE said:

I'm not saying that the treelords here were without fault, as from what I hear the way the trees were stored was less than genius, but being able to permanently kill several characters in one interaction sounds like an insanely effective way to destroy roleplay groups and should be considered anti-RP. At least in warclaims if a group's tile is taken they can monk revive and disperse, but this exterminates a population.

Nobody forces tree-lords to put their trees in a massive group of 3-4-5-6? This was a choice made by the players to all sit in a grove together. It was not the intention as stated to permanently kill a massive group, but the fact that they didn't do the one thing that is meant to protect the failsafe that keeps them from being pk'd. This would be a problem if it exterminated the population of tree-lords as a whole, but it doesn't, only the population YOU care about oocly. This is not even close to being considered anti-roleplay, still just a matter of circumstance that could have been avoided in the months of roleplay that lead up to this. 


 

[MaplTree 129]

7 minutes ago, PolarLoLs said:

 Whats your point so i can debate it clearly (/srs)

We cannot be serious bro @Chuuwys@MaplTree

Some accountability has to be taken, You lot put yourselves in this position and posting in forum statuses instead of interacting with the post itself is bunz

Hey bud, i was the first interaction with this post. Ive had nothing more to add before the second comment. Vague recliner and admin cherry picking who it effects did this. Im sure this verdict doesnt effect all the inactive soultrees

[lemonke 6014]

16 minutes ago, Werew0lf said:

 

Wait... I was there?

 

No way, I didn't... realise. I am sorry, fooldude. Please forgive me for being there. 

 

I should've done my ST verdict whilst sitting in cloud temple instead.

I am so glad we came to an understanding. Thank you, fellow roleplayer of the ST team! Peace at least.

 

21 minutes ago, Unwillingly said:

I don't have a super strong opinion on this but I do agree with the sentiment of being forced to PK because you didn't do some self RP with a sapling or something, and I generally dislike lore authoritarianism, but this conversation would benefit far more from addressing a flaw in the system or attacking something more fundamental than writing a multi-paragraphed anecdote. this post is really reactionary and accusing everyone involved of ooc plotting and bias is really weak and so tired

however saying "you signed up for it" is just rlly deflective. when you see a leaky faucet do you say "well I bought the faucet so I signed up for this" or do you try to fix the faucet? conversely this is something that, if it's so awful, should have been amended a while ago and it would have been like 2-3 sentences and a lore submission to fix. idk anything about tree lords so I might just be talking out of my ass and it's a nuanced situation but oh well

 

I merely wrote it on how I selaw the situation on my pov as a staffless noob. Remarking what I wrote to Rigorous; I was a bystander in the crossfire, so I could be biased because atm it doesn't look very good on a OOC Level from any corner of this whole situation. Again, perhaps I am wrong but I have no reasom not to think what I think.

 

I do agree with your other points. Thing is, it has never been an issue until today, but we took the completely wrong approach by mass pking ppl who werent aware nor was given an exact time on when it would die, then hopefully fixing the issue after takimg heads. It would have been far better to give a warning and then ammend it. As once again, nothing narrivately was achieved from these pks other than making people mad and wasting their time. I don't understand why the hard trigger was pressed rather than being more understanding. It could have avoided a LOT of issues and dramas.

 

I also am a very new tree lord and druid, so I can do only so much.

 

[MaplTree 129]

5 minutes ago, PolarLoLs said:

@MaplTree

I never even said anything about the freeze lol. The freeze ended on saturday, a week was a general, albeit over, estimation. Regardless, they have rped on those characters the past few days.

[hearth_ 1023]

Look man, I'm bummed that we lost the characters that we did, and the players that are refusing to play again as a result of this. But I told you this in DM's - this is on whoever thought it was a good idea to shove saplings into a box underground, and then never touch them.

 

I understand the argument of, "I don't want to do gardening rp" or "how often am i expected to self-rp". Yeah, it is kinda boring to have to go give the sapling a kiss on the cheek and tuck it in from time to time - but my friend - it's right there. It doesn't really matter if we think it's fun or not, when we sign the CA we're saying we agree to the terms & conditions. 

 

No, it doesn't say, "This plant needs 5 emotes of Druidic Energy per 1 OOC week". Yes, that's bad lore. But we still signed up for it. Squak gave you guys 30+ OOC days of a timeframe to interact with the saplings in any capacity, and none of you did. 

 

I want to be angry with you, but I can really only find myself at the conclusion that some of the seniormost members of the Druid community didn't read their lore, or ask for clarification when they were "confused". 

 

It's really not that hard. A plant needs water. Magic plant needs magic "water".