Hiebe 2493 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Seems to me like the Braveaxes are in control.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luchian 214 Author Share Posted November 5, 2011 Not really, when i picked braveaxes i only picked the ones i knew was active and could rp. but you said once: "It is almost like the ironguts rule Kal'Urguan" :P We take the ones that is active, And most of the Braveaxes is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luchian 214 Author Share Posted November 5, 2011 So you have 1 King in change of the military, and two high council leaders in charge of the military. The king has the power to veto the lower council, but not the High council. The high council can overrule the king at any time. The king has no power, just a figurehead. Why would anyone then want to become king? No the kings vote counts for 2-3 (Not yet figured) In the high council. He's also the one which will tell the High council what do get working on, So that they will pass it on to the workers. We're actually gonna finish the merchant district. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandonthefloor 2 Share Posted November 5, 2011 No the kings vote counts for 2-3 (Not yet figured) In the high council. He's also the one which will tell the High council what do get working on, So that they will pass it on to the workers. We're actually gonna finish the merchant district. That is what I am getting at, you should update your document with these things instead of not deciding on anything. And telling them what to get working on isn't really much of anything to do, just saying, because they will end up doing their own thing anyway. Don't blame finishing the merchant district on me, since I am not the architect, nor is there any point to actually finishing the district when the new map is going to come out soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zezimus 1523 Share Posted November 5, 2011 So you have 1 King in change of the military, and two high council leaders in charge of the military. The king has the power to veto the lower council, but not the High council. The high council can overrule the king at any time. The king has no power, just a figurehead. Why would anyone then want to become king? When did I say the Grand Council can overrule the King? They can oppose the King if they want but the King still has more of a say than the High Councilors do. The King also has a lot of power as he controls both the Grand Council and the military. The High Lord who is in charge of the military generally makes sure that the ranks are as they should be and is likely to lead them into battle if the Grand King is away. The Legion Commander on the other hand is there to represent the Legion on the lower council. Any High Lords on the lower council are there to govern and make sure that the Grand Council has an influence on the lower council. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandonthefloor 2 Share Posted November 5, 2011 When did I say the Grand Council can overrule the King? They can oppose the King if they want but the King still has more of a say than the High Councilors do. The King also has a lot of power as he controls both the Grand Council and the military. The High Lord who is in charge of the military generally makes sure that the ranks are as they should be and is likely to lead them into battle if the Grand King is away. The Legion Commander on the other hand is there to represent the Legion on the lower council. Any High Lords on the lower council are there to govern and make sure that the Grand Council has an influence on the lower council. You don't, the google document basically says that they can overrule the King since it only specifies that the King can overturn the lower council, but no one else. I have already explained that the King does not have power, and I will not explain it again. All I am stating is that you need to be more specific in your google doc plan than just implying that people will understand what they can and can't do. As of right now, the King does not control the military since there will be more people that will outweigh his decisions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luchian 214 Author Share Posted November 5, 2011 Yeah, Its getting updated. MEET UP IN THE CASTLE, IN KAL'URGUAN WE START IN 10 min! There is a Rp forum post about it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zezimus 1523 Share Posted November 5, 2011 You don't, the google document basically says that they can overrule the King since it only specifies that the King can overturn the lower council, but no one else. I have already explained that the King does not have power, and I will not explain it again. All I am stating is that you need to be more specific in your google doc plan than just implying that people will understand what they can and can't do. As of right now, the King does not control the military since there will be more people that will outweigh his decisions. The google document is just to give people an idea of what is going to happen, it doesn't explain every detail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandonthefloor 2 Share Posted November 5, 2011 The google document is just to give people an idea of what is going to happen, it doesn't explain every detail. Perhaps you should make a better forum post then.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dun_Irongut 104 Share Posted November 5, 2011 If the king has more power than the council and the council is able to remove the king from power, dosen't that mean the council can remove the king anytime they don't like his decision? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandonthefloor 2 Share Posted November 5, 2011 If the king has more power than the council and the council is able to remove the king from power, dosen't that mean the council can remove the king anytime they don't like his decision? Yes, but that is the same as it was before, if we all got together we could have removed the king. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broski 54 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Yes, but that is the same as it was before, if we all got together we could have removed the king. But you didnt.. Reason? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dun_Irongut 104 Share Posted November 5, 2011 So that means the king really dosen't have a say.. As if the council disliked what he said, he could be removed.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broski 54 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Your looking at it wrong, if we would vote away Thorik (which we are not going to) then we wouldnt have a good replacement cause thorik is just a really good king person. And if there is something that a grand council memver doesnt like then we discuss it, we're still friends you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dun_Irongut 104 Share Posted November 5, 2011 If your all friends then why does there need to be a king to break voting ties? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Recommended Posts