Jump to content

Hanrahan

Member
  • Posts

    2329
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hanrahan

  1. H a c k s T a l e n t l e s s H A C K S But actually its pretty ok
  2. heres an idea we pick commanders from all factions and then we fight in total war warhammer...

    1. Jachnun

      Jachnun

      what movie is that from?

    2. AmK

      AmK

      card jutsu

    3. Freischarler

      Freischarler

      it would be too easy tbh id win

  3. 123 people on and all the national capitals can't boast more then 20 people together wtf is this

  4. As to why I have not engaged in RPing this lore in game, is because of the Techlock. To engage in this RP in LotC would get me banned. So, this must be written first.
  5. I like the way you think Sporadic, and I think if we could sit down and make some nice healthy edits to that, I'd like to see it passed in your view. You've got a +1 compromise from me, friend.
  6. Let the best lore win

    1. Flugal

      Flugal

      Can the Devs please fix the server?

  7. I'm aware there's plenty of "Oh, can the techies do this?" And I'd like to discuss that with you if I can, because I don't want to ask the impossible of you.
  8. Aggressive Preface This lore will not open the Pandoras box of badly written gun lore. We will not have sniper rifles and revolvers, nor helicopters and miniguns. The reason for that is we have a very strict lore team who supervises the accepting of lore who most assuredly will not accept and tolerate a player using a minigun if they do not tolerate minor infractions of lore such as pink Ologs. ;) Secondary preface: Many of the rules I have laid out are simply a 'Throw out to the wind', and most likely subject to change with further discussion with the War team and Tech teams. I would suggest focusing on the RP guidelines of usage, and the lore behind the weaponry. Gunpowder, Cannon and Arquebus Lore Summary The above topics have been a very big debate and issue in lotc both mechanically and lore wise, with a number of questions as to how to prevent powergaming, ruining the feel of the server, disrupting whatever pvp balance that people pretend there is, and more so whatever RP combat balance people pretend there is. In this I shall try to address every single point of contention with not only a rebuttal, but with the beginnings of lore behind it. The Lore Cannons have been known to the four races before, until one of the key sources of ignition was lost due to geographical movement and little raw nitrate ore could be found within the new continents. The lack of the chief ingredient of the explosive powder forced a stop to most artillery production, as a cannon without propellant was of no use at all. However, in the late 17th century it made a startling comeback in a most unexpected source. Throughout the centuries, peasant farmers used a roundabout way of manufacturing the craved ingredient that the world has long forgotten about, at least in scientific circles. Over the course of a year in a peasant household, a large tub in a separate cellar from the house would be filled with the feces of both human and animal residents. By the month's end, it would be an extremely foul mess of decaying and composting material - which would then be dumped piecemeal into another large bin of boiling water. Left over the course of a few days with a dumping of wood shavings, a thin white crystalline scum would form over top, and be siphoned off. This substance called ‘Calfgut’ would then be stored and used as meat preservation, a substitute for brine where none could be had. Little did the average peasant know however, that this ‘Calfgut’ was in fact the Nitre of old Asulon and Aegis, and of incredible value as a principal part of the manufacture of powder. The exact discovery of this occurred in the late 17th century, a chemist finally made the connection between Nitre and Calfgut, and seized upon it. Most of the 13th century scrolls of the manufacture had however not been preserved, due to the utter lack of need for their recipes with the absence of Nitre, thus the method of mixing had to be rediscovered. This so far was the largest hitch in the rediscovery of the powder - mixing it with every alchemical substance they could find, from iron fillings to bark to thanium powder to vegetable dust. Eventually, the exhaustive list of substances were ruled down to a smaller list, involving sulfur, Nitre and charcoal. The ratios were another lost puzzle piece, and it took a great deal of funding, explosions and time to rediscover a sensible ratio - the powder being mostly Nitre, to keep the more volatile ingredients from exploding from static contact, pressure or heat. Once that puzzle piece fit in, it was time to learn how to cast cannons, which would be another issue entirely. The basic concept was of course there, that much had not been lost, but the finicky techniques of keeping the cannon together was a mystery to be solved. Inspirations were taken from Manna cannons, at least in form - but the forges of the Empire had not been equipped or built to deal with casting for anything larger than a suit of armour. Clearly, larger industry was needed. Of course with most mold casting, a divot in rock or hardened clay is made with the molten metal poured into it, then cooled and refined into whatever it may be, an arrowhead or a spear point. For the casting of one-piece cannons, a different method would have to be found. A number of methods were tried, with mixed success, until a clever smith invented a casting method of clay and sand casting, making a hollow mold, that with sufficient reinforcement and size could carry the weight of a cannon. As for the Matchlock, it was only a matter of time before someone had the idea of a portable cannon in miniature - experimentation occurred with powder ratios and shrinkage of the barrel, until a satisfactory balance was found between lethality and convenience. The result was a relatively light weapon with a long barrel, and wooden stock to give shouldering capability for stability. As for the technology involved, it is hardly more complex than a cannon - a trigger activates a hook with a burning wick to flick down upon the open hole, thus igniting the gun, and away one goes. The Mechanics Mechanically we have two different fields here, cannons for sieges and battles, and muskets and pistols for day to day usage. Cannons on the battlefield are a simpler beast to deal with, both in RP and PVP mechanically. I have always thought there is extremely little difference between a cannon and a catapult in LotC due to the mechanics of how we use them. A GM reads a code as to how to ‘play’ the cannon, and once operated successfully by a crew, the GM would then ‘fire’ the cannon, and based upon the pre-written code, do damage accordingly. The code will be as follows. To use a cannon on a battlefield, a flat cost of usage would be 1500 Minas. Once the cannon is properly built, a team of men will have to go through the proper emotes as to work it before it can fire, as any other piece of LotC siege machinery. A man must take a powder charge and stuff it in the barrel. A man must then load a stone ball shot. Ram the shot in. Lock the wheels in place if on land, push it forward if on sea. Punch a needle through the ignition hole. Apply the the fire via smouldering stick. Fire the cannon. Swab the cannon. Repeat. Now, the actual effects of the cannon will depend on the substance being fired upon. For anti-infantry attacks, I would suggest a firecharge be thrown launched from a dispenser that could sit on the front of the cannon. As for siege mechanics, that’s a different animal altogether, but not so difficult to tackle, I reckon. It would depend on two factors - the size of the cannon, and the material and size of the wall. Should the cannon be a 1x4 barrel culverin, one block may be removed if the substance the target hits is wooden, or a wall of stone 1 block deep. Should the cannon be a large barrel bombard of 1x1x5 it will do five to six blocks worth of damage to a wooden structure, or stone structure of one blocks depth. Should a stone wall be more than one block in depth, it will do one or two block’s damage to the structure. The actual firing range will be limited, with a maximum block range of 25 blocks. Muskets (Matchlocks, to be specific) With Cannons done, I would now like to move onto the matchlock rifle. The deep seated fear in the community is that the weapons will be overpowered, overused, and abused like any other incredibly powerful magic or tool. My idea is to mostly circumnavigate this by implementing a physical, mechanical series of weapons using the old Anthos staff model. This would work to the servers benefit in two ways. To Refresh, in Anthos, there were charged staves that shot out a line of fire that upon hitting someone did a large amount of damage and did minor knockback. Essentially, an arrow that didn’t drop down, but traveled straight. Coupled with a long reload time, you essentially have a mechanical PVP rifle. Long reload? Check. Ammunition in the form of Emeralds? Check. Straight fire shooting and little skill to use? Check. Because of the complexity, and let’s face it - the danger of powergaming, nobody wants to see every old peasant whip out a preloaded matchlock and sock a bullet into the Emperor’s chest - I would mandate that to rp using a pistol or musket, you must have the MC item on your person as well, or the RP is considered void. In order to build these muskets and handguns, I believe the best way to regulate it would to either put it behind a fairly skillful tinkerer and smith - for the parts and assembly, of course, make it a multi-skill build, or have GMs name the item as someone in RP builds it. Both would make the process slow, and give rarity to the items. The obtaining of gunpowder could remain as it is in Nexus crafting, or it could be edited to reflect the methods of which it’s gathered - which would take some plugin crafting. I would suggest a drop of poop when you kill cows, then you put the poop into a cauldron and boil it into Nitre/Gunpowder, or go the extra mile and make them combine it with charcoal and ‘Sulphur’ (Possibly a drop of magma powder while mining), then combine all of that into gunpowder. Mechanically, they would work like the staffs of Anthos did. Slow reload, five to ten seconds. Consumable ammunition, a firework charge. Incredibly high damage output - enough to pop a man in full iron armour. As for the RP useage of the matchlock weapons, that is another can of worms entirely. Like every other form of RP, it is susceptible to idiocy, and unfortunately we cannot make a rule against that. However, we can try our best with clear, concise guidelines. It’s too heavy handed to write every single rule for these, but here are a series of guidelines that might have a go at reducing the abuse these weapons might face. As with all weaponry of a ranged variety, it cannot be a one shot weapon. Due to the burning wick nature of the matchlock, the fuse must be lit as an RP action before use. If it is raining and outdoors, make sure you notice this. The gun will not work. Although a gun, it is by no means a modern weapon. Wounds are eminently survivable, and no more dangerous than a crossbow bolt or arrow. In some cases, less damaging. Muskets can be carried preloaded, but the pan must still be filled with ignition powder and the wick must be lit before they are fired. Now, because of the nature of people (inherently noob), a roll system would be the best way to settle disputes before they happen with range and accuracy citations and all that garbage we see with crossbows. If it is not raining, the shooter must roll for a successful ignition, and score 5+/20. (Roll over 5 to fire your musket.) If the shooter rolls under a 5, they must emote putting powder into the pan of their musket again. Instead of the shooter rolling for accuracy, the target will roll for it instead. To not be hit, the person being shot at must roll above 15/20. (Roll over 15 to not get hit by a musket.) Any shot that lands (the victim rolls below 15/20) will translate into a wound, with the lower number increasing the severity and accuracy. Should a man fire, and the shot victim rolls a 1, the shot would find it’s mark and be as damaging as possible. (The closer your roll is to 1, the more injured you are.) At extremely close ranges - two blocks or less, (I.E. execution-type scenarios where the target is not moving very fast or immobilized.), the shooter will roll for ignition, like any other scenario. The target, however, will be hit no matter what. When you fire the weapon, you must announce over shout: [!] A Gunshot echoes over the landscape. [!] Plate armour will not stop a bullet, don’t talk about that.
  9. #OrcLivesMatter#GasBadGMs

  10. Because they were emeralds in Asulon, I've always pictured them as ornately carved and sigiled gemstones of a green color.
  11. hohoho travellers

  12. Vote for *Modified* Anthos !

  13. Vote for Anthos !

     

  14. don't forget to vote if you want anthos to be our next map a high voter turnout is required or else the admins will fart on it

     

  15. Edit: Anthos didn't actually get flooded that was Asulon Anthos we literally got bored off and left in rp via a portal

  16. Anthos for next map

    1. Kvasir
    2. drfate786

      drfate786

      I agree, it would be feasible lorewise. Perhaps the water levels decreased enough for us to make a return? 

    3. ibraheemc2000

      ibraheemc2000

      never played on anthos and only heard good stuff I agree it sounds fun(this anser can change to a no if there is so dessert for haria)

      XD

  17. How the eff do you put a picture onto a forum post these days

    1. Vaynth

      Vaynth

      Usually by copy and pasting the image directly onto it.

  18. "We can only recreate named items if they are already existing." There's some EI Office levels of thinking there. +1 GM team you nyaff shilpits

    1. iris1612

      iris1612

      nyaff shilpits.. that's a new one

  19. any more rules and we'll start needing lawyers to clarify bans and fight them because no way a regular player will understand it

    1. Raomir

      Raomir

      rules definitely need to be condensed, this is getting out of control lol

  20. classic mat leaving apps up for 3+ months

  21. does the LT actually know how hated they are

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. excited

      excited

      Even if people gather and interpret evidence in a neutral manner, they may still remember it selectively to reinforce their expectations. This effect is called "selective recall", "confirmatory memory" or "access-biased memory".[30] Psychological theories differ in their predictions about selective recall. Schema theory predicts that information matching prior expectations will be more easily stored and recalled than information that does not match.[31] Some alternative approaches say that surprising information stands out and so is memorable.[31] Predictions from both these theories have been confirmed in different experimental contexts, with no theory winning outright.[32]

       

      In one study, participants read a profile of a woman which described a mix of introverted and extroverted behaviors.[33] They later had to recall examples of her introversion and extroversion. One group was told this was to assess the woman for a job as a librarian, while a second group were told it was for a job in real estate sales. There was a significant difference between what these two groups recalled, with the "librarian" group recalling more examples of introversion and the "sales" groups recalling more extroverted behavior.[33] A selective memory effect has also been shown in experiments that manipulate the desirability of personality types.[31][34] In one of these, a group of participants were shown evidence that extroverted people are more successful than introverts. Another group were told the opposite. In a subsequent, apparently unrelated, study, they were asked to recall events from their lives in which they had been either introverted or extroverted. Each group of participants provided more memories connecting themselves with the more desirable personality type, and recalled those memories more quickly.[35]

       

      Changes in emotional states can also influence memory recall.[36][37] Participants rated how they felt when they had first learned that O.J. Simpson had been acquitted of murder charges.[36] They described their emotional reactions and confidence regarding the verdict one week, two months, and one year after the trial. Results indicated that participants' assessments for Simpson's guilt changed over time. The more that participants' opinion of the verdict had changed, the less stable were the participant's memories regarding their initial emotional reactions. When participants recalled their initial emotional reactions two months and a year later, past appraisals closely resembled current appraisals of emotion. People demonstrate sizable myside bias when discussing their opinions on controversial topics.[21] Memory recall and construction of experiences undergo revision in relation to corresponding emotional states.

       

      Myside bias has been shown to influence the accuracy of memory recall.[37] In an experiment, widows and widowers rated the intensity of their experienced grief six months and five years after the deaths of their spouses. Participants noted a higher experience of grief at six months rather than at five years. Yet, when the participants were asked after five years how they had felt six months after the death of their significant other, the intensity of grief participants recalled was highly correlated with their current level of grief. Individuals appear to utilize their current emotional states to analyze how they must have felt when experiencing past events.[36] Emotional memories are reconstructed by current emotional states.

       

      One study showed how selective memory can maintain belief in extrasensory perception (ESP).[38] Believers and disbelievers were each shown descriptions of ESP experiments. Half of each group were told that the experimental results supported the existence of ESP, while the others were told they did not. In a subsequent test, participants recalled the material accurately, apart from believers who had read the non-supportive evidence. This group remembered significantly less information and some of them incorrectly remembered the results as supporting ESP.[38]

    3. Gone

      Gone

      Get told not to use unapproved magic again? 

    4. BrandNewKitten
  22. Minecraft Name: Radahan Skype Name (This may alternatively be PMed to be for privacy purposes): Hanrahan Applicant Name: Arnorian Elendil Race and Age: Adunian, 345 What title are you applying for? (A lower-tiered one: Librarian, Maven, Inventor, Analyst, Phrenal): Professor ;) List any experience you have had with matters regarding that Department: - Previously was the Head of the Department of Naturalism in Anthos Describe the reason for your interest in that position (>5 sentences): - See above By applying, should you be accepted you are expected to utterly adhere to the Common Clauses. Do you understand this?: - See above x2
×
×
  • Create New...