Jump to content

UnBaed

Iron VIP
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1787

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

9015 Rep Farm Business Owner

About UnBaed

  • Rank
    opinions of me are fan theories
  • Birthday 12/23/1999

Contact Methods

  • Minecraft Username
    UnBaed

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Tamriel
  • Interests
    ppbbbbllllttttt

Character Profile

  • Character Name
    The Main Character
  • Character Race
    Human

Recent Profile Visitors

133692 profile views

Single Status Update

See all updates by UnBaed

  1. UnBaed

    I got a question on banning players during investigations, why is only one side banned even if there’s evidence against the original accuser?  Think most people know the sticky situation I speak of, I’m curious of the reasoning for this route in handling an issue.  Banning the accused and keeping them banned despite the clear possibility of their innocence seems like you’ve already decided to stick with what was first presented to you, even if it could have been false.

    1. monkeypoacher

      monkeypoacher

      generally because the behavior being reported is an immediate danger to the community while making a false report is not (and can be dealt with appropriately later on with complete evidence) 

    2. Statherian

      Statherian

      Who got banned?

    3. ImCookiie

      ImCookiie

      I'm gonna address this tonight, but as a foreword— neither party was banned pending investigation, during the entire process. We reserve investigation bans for other situations, such as immediate threats or suspected alts (while we conclude the remainder of the investigation). Investigation bans help us out, since most people will reach out to us & provide whatever information they can. @UnBaed

×
×
  • Create New...