Jump to content

Subpoena: THE CROWN v. BRANDT & D'EMYTH


valecu

Recommended Posts

V3jOfk8rvWDBjOFvmV29AvjykQFyDlUmq1RsOMGgyqFs24WksBMQpCv3h4UEBjedkFYxWxIuUrpvNd3kO5Oe8QBVJM_h0zXfVedmryMBfeWmSvgGmSJA7Jv3HkOuEsIhYwMEVUtX

THE CROWN v. BRANDT & D’EMYTH

3rd of Tobias’ Bounty, 1813

aOJZLw4j2e_C0qIjotLu27_Qog8rWn9G1wEE2kYjiDfB9VlzMbSlDlLW5ATBhzcpG-CNhKNm5NSWazZtiyChox8OjEdHlqCjgkS2XmNGoIZ37XrHQJgq9NX4E58omSUoMSxOWoIP

Y5IguW_kTLQl62_aliNvP5O7VwNeTAfx6TbsF4RNsSioXvEBbJG4N6yvbLutkWWOeKe3D2fhs7MyqAfGGAAzIzWnslze869mfwRqlke45uxnetgCoOWLsaaoD-yPffnQdZ_-tMas

THE CROWN,

Represented by Valent de Rosius of the MINISTRY OF JUSTICE,

 

DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY TO COURT;

 

Brandt

Elijah Alexander  d’Emyth

 

V3jOfk8rvWDBjOFvmV29AvjykQFyDlUmq1RsOMGgyqFs24WksBMQpCv3h4UEBjedkFYxWxIuUrpvNd3kO5Oe8QBVJM_h0zXfVedmryMBfeWmSvgGmSJA7Jv3HkOuEsIhYwMEVUtX

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:



 

Elijah Alexander d’Emyth

 

202.04A - On Murder: Where an individual intentionally commits such an act of violence upon another which brings about their death, with no premeditation, this shall be a murder in the second degree, a felony.

 

209.03A - On Attempt: Where an individual actively attempts, but fails to commit, a crime, the individual shall be held liable with a mitigated punishment according to the crime which was attempted.

 

Brandt

 

202.02B - On Battery: Where an individual intentionally commits upon another an unlawful act of  violence which brings about lasting, but not permanent injury, incapacitates for any length of time, or utilizes a dangerous weapon , this shall be battery of second degree, a misdemeanor.

 

- Broke Aimee de Frand’s ribs and her knee and Agnes de Frand’s nose.

 

202.04A - On Murder: Where an individual intentionally commits such an act of violence upon another which brings about their death, with no premeditation, this shall be a murder in the second degree, a felony.

 

209.03A - On Attempt: Where an individual actively attempts, but fails to commit, a crime, the individual shall be held liable with a mitigated punishment according to the crime which was attempted.





 

 

Oren Revised Code, CH202.02‘On Battery’


Oren Revised Code, CH202.04‘On Murder’


Oren Revised Code, CH209.03‘On Attempt’


 

During the peasant revolt Aimee de Frand and few others were in the tavern, where she called the peasants filthy, provoking Brandt which had issues with her as she sold Ivy Dust, making his friend addicted to it, on top of that Aimee called Anna Henrietta names which provoked them even more. Brandt punched her in the jaw and dragged her to the Ivy House, on the next floor where he beat her - breaking her ribs and knee, he then threatened to throw her out of the window. She jumped from the stairs where she was caught by some of the witnesses, Elijah tried to stab her but he was stopped by Agnes de Frand, resulting in kicking her at the face with no injury dealt. 

Y5IguW_kTLQl62_aliNvP5O7VwNeTAfx6TbsF4RNsSioXvEBbJG4N6yvbLutkWWOeKe3D2fhs7MyqAfGGAAzIzWnslze869mfwRqlke45uxnetgCoOWLsaaoD-yPffnQdZ_-tMas

WITH THE PRESENCE OF THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT PARTY OR PARTIES:

 

Edith Hope

Sir Candle Wick

Nataliya Reza

Agnes de Frand

Ricky O’Rourke


Written Evidence
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Vo3TAI4PN3U85MrRcsZSyvVzE1cgwOtjGlite4YntHY/edit?usp=sharing

 

ON THE DESIRED DATE OF:

[[DATE OF TRIAL / PENDING DISCUSSION WITH DEFENDANT]

 

YOURS HUMBLY,

Valent de Rosius on behalf of THE CROWN,

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE, BASRID CIRCLE COURTHOUSE, PROVIDENCE

Valecius#5323

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Why would such evidence about such trivial matters be classified anyway?" asked Basil Moroul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, Valecius said:

During the peasant revolt Aimee de Frand and few others were in the tavern, where she called the peasants filthy, provoking Brandt which had issues with her as she sold Ivy Dust, making his friend addicted to it, on top of that Aimee called Anna Henrietta names which provoked them even more. Brandt punched her in the jaw and dragged her to the Ivy House, on the next floor where he beat her - breaking her ribs and knee, he then threatened to throw her out of the window. She jumped from the stairs where she was caught by some of the witnesses, Elijah tried to stab her but he was stopped by Agnes de Frand, resulting in kicking her at the face with no injury dealt. 

 

 

James would read through the list of charges with somewhat of a smug grin of vindication. Upon reaching the paragraph at the bottom where the charges were explained, his brow would furrow as his expression shifted to that of confusion. He attempted to read the story a second time before shaking his head.

 

"Damn thing is completely unreadable. The ministry of justice needs to get its act together, I swear."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alexander d'Emyth offers a sigh, sitting down to pen a lawyer for his son. Such is fitting for the detailed, rather absurd matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Valecius said:

During the peasant revolt Aimee de Frand and few others were in the tavern, where she called the peasants filthy,

"Could this woman not be brought before a court for instigating the recent murders of homeless peasants, perhaps she is involved?" also asked Basil Moroul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

James Fisher reads the subpoena with interest, taking notes and writing a letter. The pale man hands the letter off to a courier to deliver to one Brandt and one Elijah Alexander d’Emyth "Whether I represent them or not, I only hope they seek legal representation." he'd state to himself in conclusion.

[[Letter only readable by the players of Brandt and Elijah Alexander d'Emyth and any additional peoples whom they deem to share it with!]]

"To one Brandt or Elijah d'Emyth,

Should you seek legal representation in regards to the criminal charges laid against you know that I, James Fisher, offer you free consultation. It is my belief that you have a very strong case to protect yourself from felony charges and have them lowered to a misdemeanor or potentially thrown out in court. Should you wish to accept free consultation please pen me a letter and have it delivered to Komnenos Street 8, my abode. You may also reach me via bird sent to Providence.

Your truly,
James Fisher, Criminal Defense Attorney"

Link to post
Share on other sites

m9HgxsR.png

10th of Sigismund’s End, 1808


In accordance with the Legal Procedure Act, The Honourable Elisa Reiss, does duly assign herself to these proceedings. Accordingly, the assigned Judge shall schedule a preliminary hearing with the Plaintiff and the Defendant in order to review the merits of the case and decide if the matter shall be allowed to proceed to trial.
 



The following parties are to contact Judge Reiss to arrange a suitable date to present themselves before the Court:
 
- The Plaintiff Valent de Rosius [@Valecius] on behalf of The Crown.
 
- The Defendants Brandt [@champ] and Elijah Alexander d'Emyth [@MannyMannyManny] and their representative.
 
The following parties are required to perform the following actions for the sake of procedure:
 
- The Defendant is obliged to present to the Court a Replying Affidavit at least one saint day before the time of the trial, outlining their responses to the alleged crimes.
 
Both parties are to exchange their Books of Evidence and submit them to the Court at least one saint day before the trial is to occur.

 


 

Yours Humbly,

Elisa Reiss

(Please add my discord, Alicia#9441)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lf8CxlqIY7Ga_cGAyqzfc_ysHntNOZQlnazGduWCf3Jdd-tTyUjbZwG1Y8WEaFNP-TFgWBeL37b0fOtjZuj24y9tntkmoIfmx8eW9hWGG-rnzjLD4rcps3zebvvaeaKbG7jSFCzL

Replying Affidavit

12th of The Deep Cold, 1814

 

NjX5xXhEx2CZpe_FcO7Jxru2UhLcoOIZlG4cOUUOnviPKua0qvUvysKQ4y3_48MA07M5pnyBxkOXiT1X6OOcVZMDy-6APeW4hbV1EC7UVQyWwic0x5hjwNYxYiF_DKtOnqfFBPHm

Brandt & D’Emyth

Represented by Henrik Komnenos & James Fisher,

 

DESIRES TO RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING  SUIT;

THE CROWN  v. BRANDT & D’EMUTH

 

 

Lf8CxlqIY7Ga_cGAyqzfc_ysHntNOZQlnazGduWCf3Jdd-tTyUjbZwG1Y8WEaFNP-TFgWBeL37b0fOtjZuj24y9tntkmoIfmx8eW9hWGG-rnzjLD4rcps3zebvvaeaKbG7jSFCzL

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

Elijah Alexander d’Emyth

 

202.04A - On Murder: Where an individual intentionally commits such an act of violence upon another which brings about their death, with no premeditation, this shall be a murder in the second degree, a felony.

 

209.03A - On Attempt: Where an individual actively attempts, but fails to commit, a crime, the individual shall be held liable with a mitigated punishment according to the crime which was attempted.

 

During the statements and testimony of our client we call in

210.04 - On Duress

210.04A - Where an individual commits a crime intentionally, but under reasonably

proximate threat of force equal to or less than the severity of the crime committed,

that individual shall not be held liable. Rather, the individual responsible for the

threat shall be held liable.

 

 

as our client stepped into an ordeal to help a close friend of his from being stabbed, which is why he should not be held liable of the outcome, even tho it turned around and it's in our belief that Miss De Frand should be the one held liable for the outcome and not our client

 

Brandt

 

202.02B - On Battery: Where an individual intentionally commits upon another an unlawful act of  violence which brings about lasting, but not permanent injury, incapacitates for any length of time, or utilizes a dangerous weapon , this shall be battery of second degree, a misdemeanor.

 

- Broke Aimee de Frand’s ribs and her knee and Agnes de Frand’s nose.

 

202.04A - On Murder: Where an individual intentionally commits such an act of violence upon another which brings about their death, with no premeditation, this shall be a murder in the second degree, a felony.

 

209.03A - On Attempt: Where an individual actively attempts, but fails to commit, a crime, the individual shall be held liable with a mitigated punishment according to the crime which was attempted.

 

on the charges of Battery for our client Brandt we would like to call in

210.08 - On Provocation

210.08A - Where an individual is invoked or compelled by another individual to act

with a sudden or temporary loss of self control and commits a crime as a response,

the individual shall be held liable with mitigated punishment or lesser conviction.

 

As Miss De frand was the trigger for the fight in the first place

 

On the attempted murder we would like to call in 

210.07 - On Necessity

210.07A - Where an individual is compelled by circumstances beyond their control,

as a last resort, commit a crime in order to prevent a more injurious outcome, that

individual shall not be held liable.

 

As Miss De Frand had prior drawn her own dagger on our client and he was acting in self defense and in the necessity to save his own life. and should not be held liable for the outcome

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruling on Crown v. Brandt & d'Emyth

12th of Owyn's Light, 1813


 

As the Plaintiff has withdrawn the subpoena, the court sees it fit to dismiss the case with prejudice, as it has been settled independently.

 


Signed,

The Right Honourable Judge E. Reiss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...