In Regards To Recent Events...

[Areon 947]

I would like to save my arse apologize to anyone who I offended with my bit of comic relief, seems it was taken too far.

[mmat 7460]

stop removin legit posts???

[Areon 947]

stop removin legit posts???

 

Indeed, that last post was an actual apology I wanted to remain there for any I might have offended.

 

(Wish granted xx)

[comanderbly^ 499]

It's their teamspeak? They can do what the **** they want, like someone said in the video, just disconnect and **** off, don't act like a poor victim.

[lιoɴ 248]

stop removin legit posts???

 

Jokes about spiderman and previous bans (aka george) will be sorted out soon enough. For now, keeping the topic clear. Stop messing around and maybe this conversation might actually lead to a solution- which it was before specific individuals got involved.

[Lvke 1000]

w-what have i done

[Neri 3590]

w-what have i done

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g

 

It's okay. You didn't start the fire, it was always burning since the world started turning.

[Areon 947]

w-what have i done

 

Well you were responsible for the halting of the third reich, so thats a plus.

 

Edit: Freya, for that link I don't know if I should laugh or hate you.

[Roggvir 315]

 

 

FM's oughta know better.

[IevIr4d 29]

At least you should know we abuse each other as much as we abuse you sha. Now I don't know you personally but obviously my friends don't like you and they /own/ the rymora.net teamspeak server, so that logic of joining and expecting not to get trolled/abused is what exactly? Also from what I've heard this isn't the first time so why go into the nest of vipers (ilyguysreally) when you have a history of getting bitten?

[Nefarious Aus Shitpost 891]

guys stop...

 

I think the best questions to ask is "should GM's be restricted to only banning people over verbatim violations of rules?" and "should the rules be re-written to be more clear-cut?" (i.e. "Harassment in any form will not be tolerated" -> "Harassment in any form will not be tolerated on Lord of the Craft controlled mediums including: GameVox, Teamspeak, Forums, Server, etc.")

[Areon 947]

guys stop...

 

I think the best questions to ask is "should GM's be restricted to only banning people over verbatim violations of rules?" and "should the rules be re-written to be more clear-cut?" (i.e. "Harassment in any form will not be tolerated" -> "Harassment in any form will not be tolerated on Lord of the Craft controlled mediums including: GameVox, Teamspeak, Forums, Server, etc.")

I think it should really be a "say something" point, if you're invading someone's personal space, they have the right to tell you to back the f.uck up, same goes with someone's personal TS.

 

At the same time, if someone is harassing you to the point where its no longer friendly insulting, say something, if they don't stop, alert an admin in private and get it handled by one of the higher-ups to remove any slight chance of pocket-GM biasness, as well as to prevent any of the drama and trolling, as seen here, from spreading. 

[Eddywilson2 2117]

I've heard things that Teerz has talked about in TS that's let's just say are girl friendly and not guy friendly. These are teenage/college boys hanging out with their buddies on TS while playing video games. Have you ever heard a CoD chat? It's similar to that.

When you are kicked in the first place for talking about things they don't want to hear and come back trying to cause more trouble, you are going to get some crap in it. Is it right? Not necessarily, but it is a separate medium where people want to hang out and act like that. It's the same reason why a GM can't log onto a CoD chat for example and ban people who are raging at the game.

[Lago 2572]

There's a difference between a video game and a human.

[Areon 947]

There's a difference between a video game and a human.

 

Indeed so, do you intend to elaborate on the topic, or leave it as such? It will be nice to get the creative, reasonable, debate progressing.