Shadeleaf 1022 Share Posted January 8, 2016 Bryophytes, Trolls, and Imp Parasites are no longer playable creatures 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone 869 Share Posted January 8, 2016 2 minutes ago, ¤Arzota¤ said: With the removal of these creatures, comes the possibility for more playable creatures to be accepted and implemented into Rp. I'd like an explanation behind this thought process. How does removing anything affect the chances of new lore being accepted? 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky 0 Share Posted January 8, 2016 What's the logic in "If we remove this, we can accept this!" ? We are a continually expansive world, there shouldn't be a limit to the creatures rolling about. Just because they are 'playable' by the players, doesn't mean they don't inhabit this world without a player behind a screen controlling them. There's literally no point in this. 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford 1996 Share Posted January 8, 2016 Good idea. Very nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nug 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2016 what is the point 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luv 3469 Share Posted January 8, 2016 Bryophytes... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadeleaf 1022 Author Share Posted January 8, 2016 7 minutes ago, Tiliena said: I'd like an explanation behind this thought process. How does removing anything affect the chances of new lore being accepted? 6 minutes ago, ˢᵏʸ said: What's the logic in "If we remove this, we can accept this!" ? We are a continually expansive world, there shouldn't be a limit to the creatures rolling about. Just because they are 'playable' by the players, doesn't mean they don't inhabit this world without a player behind a screen controlling them. There's literally no point in this. A big reason why new lore may or may not be denied or accepted is the ability of other lore to 'basically do the same thing'. We've just gotten rid of big trolls, magical elemental parasite creatures, and demon parasite creature 'things', and your everyday blob. This opens up a big category of stuff new lore can fill in and expand upon. Perhaps it wasn't the best phrasing, apologies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford 1996 Share Posted January 8, 2016 lets be honest bryophytes were always pretty **** 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space 2335 Share Posted January 8, 2016 3 minutes ago, ¤Arzota¤ said: A big reason why new lore may or may not be denied or accepted is the ability of other lore to 'basically do the same thing'. We've just gotten rid of big trolls, magical elemental parasite creatures, and demon parasite creature 'things', and your everyday blob. This opens up a big category of stuff new lore can fill in and expand upon. Perhaps it wasn't the best phrasing, apologies. Why? If you are going to remove lore that does basically the same thing as some new lore, and then accept the basically the same lore thing, you end up with BASICALLY THE SAME LORE MAKING THE REMOVAL POINTLES ARE WE IN CRAZY LAND WHAT THE **** AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlternateKy 89 Share Posted January 8, 2016 This is so unfortunate... Trolls were just starting to become more popular. Three /accepted/ applications within one week, darn. I had so much planned for my Troll. R.I.P Urgrum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
H 820 Share Posted January 8, 2016 9 minutes ago, ¤Arzota¤ said: A big reason why new lore may or may not be denied or accepted is the ability of other lore to 'basically do the same thing'. We've just gotten rid of big trolls, magical elemental parasite creatures, and demon parasite creature 'things', and your everyday blob. This opens up a big category of stuff new lore can fill in and expand upon. Perhaps it wasn't the best phrasing, apologies. Wait, if you're removing lore so that you can add lore that does the same thing, what was the point of the removal in the first place? And if there are other characteristics of the new lore that could stand on their own, wouldn't they be accepted anyway? 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrlollytime 102 Share Posted January 8, 2016 throws away bryophyte app, finished skin and goes to change the rp built up to it....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monomakhos 1849 Share Posted January 8, 2016 death to bryophytes 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stag 3234 Share Posted January 8, 2016 I would urge the team to not be opposed to the return of these groups in the future. Especially with trolls as they are a staple. If a group of players come to you and say "we would like to play these creatures that aren't currently on the server but have been" the team should be lax about it. That's just my opinion. The other ones were both decent ideas but neither were fully realized in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
(1).thumb.png.4a11a14f60b1e7958b1715d016df0a90.png)
.thumb.gif.f709f772262c3d118a3976046301432e.gif)
.thumb.png.c6be97ec5a2f30cf7e8d8f424bbeade5.png)
.thumb.jpeg.7a2a5c6fda5bc3b4e960a8645bb0ab98.jpeg)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
.thumb.gif.c4804540109a430a35eb0021ce7df945.gif)
Recommended Posts