Nation Leader Rule Addition

[Tsuyose 3285]

Hello,

 

In more recent times, more specifically directed toward the Nation Leaders and Region Owners alike there have been a myriad of consistent issues correlating to their subjects and vassals. After extensive discussions with both the Administration and GM team we have opted to accept my following proposal to the region rules:

 

• Nation Leaders obtain control over their respective subregions existing within their predefined nation borders.
• Nation Leaders obtain the right to remove/add region owners within their respective sub-regions/parental regions inside their predefined nation borders.
• Nation Leaders, with the consent of the respective region owner, henceforth obtain the ability to circumvent raid rules (time limit.)

 

To clarify on this, Nation Leaders will now obtain absolute control over their vassals sub-regions- declining removal from a region will result in open rebellion against the specific nation in question. Likewise, they must contact you and provide you with the bare minimum of one week before the removal of locked objects and from the region itself. Correlating to the last rule, nations leaders, with the consent of the respective region owner can now circumvent the time limit on raid rules to permit an early raid- emphasis on obtaining region owner permission regardless.

 

 

All attempts at removing a region owner must officially be declared to the player, at the very least, one week beforehand. Providing them with the opportunity of leaving without their locks being instantaneously removed.

[WuHanXianShi14 0]

Cool

 

[Guest]

Beautiful!

[Harri 4815]

bad rule this supports region sniping '-.- come on how biased can u be.. .   .. .    .  .. ..

 

I'd like to suggest that removal of Region Owners also be approved by the higher Staff Teams, and a valid reason should be given with it, so that they have something to judge it on other than "i want him off lol" (should there be a dispute about whether a player should be an owner or not).

[Ioannis 1480]

Harrison couldnt say it better. This is the worst **** you added so far.

 

I know you werent being serious lol 

 

So if the said vassal decides to simply ignore his nation leader, can he use the plot he corrently has to rebel?(Within the 1 week warning).

[ski_king3 0]

Just now, HB_ said:

bad rule this supports region sniping '-.- come on how biased can u be.. .   .. .    .  .. ..

But actually though...

[Harri 4815]

11 hours ago, Ioannis said:

Harrison couldnt say it better. This is the worst **** you added so far.

I wasn't actually being serious, just for the record.

 

I edited it to actually have a serious opinion in there too.

[osumanduas 1442]

heheh

[Ambduscias 1028]

[rubs hands together zionistly]

[Kardel 1054]

an amazing addition to the server! bravo! nice job!

[Thatpyrodude 2008]

******* bless

[Jistuma 1996]

So, now define nation leaders, because as far as I know, Oren owns almost everything (besides dwarves and Sutica). So can the emperor of the humans just remove anyone they want from power from all the elf settlements, the orc settlements, and the other settlements that they own? And the leader of the elves cannot remove the leaders of their settlements? It should be one or the other (either the emperor is the only one, or it's the kings that do it, not the emperor)

[Vege 4804]

This is absolutely horrifying and a major setback for all nations on lotc, I'm currently having Courland PTSD with this post.

[Reno 239]

So basically your giving the okay for nation leaders to OOC'ly dislike their region owners, thus allowing them to take the region over with basically no RP involved.  Glad to know civil wars and internal conflicts wont be a thing anymore. Becuase who ever has the leader on their side can just kick the other people out. 

 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[func_Soap 410]

It should be assumed that the 'lower' region owner has more control over the people in the sub-region than the 'higher' region owner, eg the baron over his barony comes before the duke above him, the King of the kingdom over the Emperor the kingdom is part of.

 

This is basic autonomy. The rule seems to have it the wrong way round. Can't say I'm thrilled.