Jump to content

Opinion Poll on the Admins


Guest

Pyro's Unban  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is these do you believe happened?

    • The Admin's abused their power to unban Pyro in a biased manner.
      36
    • The Admin's made a just and reasonable decision after taking all evidence into consideration to unban Pyro.
      45
    • The Admin's may have taken things into consideration but they should have spoken with the GM's.
      17
    • Other? Please comment and share your thoughts! I totally care!
      6

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Just now, Gusano Arentonio said:

jesus christ was i really that irrelevant

0
 

were you even admin at the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Thomas said:

were you even admin at the time

beast and i literally got added at the same time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gusano Arentonio said:

beast and i literally got added at the same time

0
 

oh well then yes you were that irrelevant <#

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just confused, how did admins abuse their power to unban pyro in a biased manner? The unbanning was being voted on by the moderators, then was decided to be an administrative decision and that vote came out in his favour. It's hardly abuse of power, when they were in the right to vote on the unbanning, and how was it biased? Biased towards whom? The current administration is made up of; Harold, Wrynn, 501, and Telanir, out of which none of them talk with him on a personal level and none actively interact with him, or the group Pyro associates with. Labeling something as either 'abusive' or 'biased' does more harm when it's in ignorance. Whether I believe he should be unbanned, kept banned for longer, or just removed from the community as a whole, is quite frankly irrelevant to the topic at hand, which floats about the topic of 'did the admins do wrong' to which, it's a large matter of perspective.

 

Pyro wished to be unbanned. The vote went to the administration. Voting ended with an unbanning.

 

Where is the abuse, where is the bias? Simply stating that you think there is abuse or bias there doesn't help anything. What was abused? What bias exists there? Vagueness and ignorance shouldn't be used as something to base your opinions off of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ban was totally unjust in the first place. Honestly, what did he do that rendered him worthy of being banned this long at all?

 

And no, being a high-up member of a faction that might have opposed yours in role-play is not the answer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1: y'alls boyfriend got unbanned be chill with it

2: Do not post people's private stuff, no matter what it is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I apologize for the delayed response. Despite the date, I have decided it appropriate to reply anyways.

 

Not much to be said on this one.

 

We acted as we believed was appropriate and even now, far past the date of this thread, we are confident it has been the correct decision.

 

 

This thread will close in 24 hours unless otherwise contested.

 

 

Thank you,

 

Telanir @ LotC Administration

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Telanir said:

Nothing to be said on this one.

 

We acted as we believed was appropriate and even now, far past the date of this thread, we are confident it has been the correct decision.

 

 

This thread will close in 24 hours unless otherwise contested.

 

 

Thank you,

 

Telanir @ LotC Administration

 

81b7e436ad.png
431c733378.png

cf4ad0ad58.png

Dude. You're the worst. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Heff said:

81b7e436ad.png
431c733378.png

cf4ad0ad58.png

Dude. You're the worst. 

 

 

Take a look at the recent admin feedback replies, I'm going through them all one by one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Telanir said:

 

Take a look at the recent admin feedback replies, I'm going through them all one by one.

 

Getting to feedback months later is absurd. This **** should be dealt with when appropriately timed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Heff said:

Getting to feedback months later is absurd. This **** should be dealt with when appropriately timed

 

 

Unfortunately, you are correct. It is absolutely absurd. However, I believe instead of tossing it now, that I should reply to it nonetheless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moved to The Great Library. It shall be sorted into the appropriate category shortly.

 

If you feel this is a mistake, please contact myself or any FM and we'll restore it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...