Jump to content

[Your View] Conquest Proposal Specifics

 Share


mmat

System Specific  

80 members have voted

  1. 1. Should large, non-racial capital cities with an active population be exempt from destruction from a conquering force?

    • Yes, they should be exempt from destruction.
      19
    • No, racial capitals should be the only areas exempt from destruction.
      9
    • No areas should be exempt from destruction
      52


Recommended Posts

That road tavern is popular because of its location and it's location alone. Same with the standing inn. Any plot in that area is bound to sink the most RP.

 

Let's not kid ourselves by pretending it's anything else.

 

I'm going to stop you right there, as I've helped with taverns in other locations before. It's not just the location, but it is a huge factor. Saying it's purely the location is silly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That road tavern is popular because of its location and it's location alone. Same with the standing inn. Any plot in that area is bound to sink the most RP.

Let's not kid ourselves by pretending it's anything else.

Ignorant, not even going to reply just read my statement that I replied with prior to your wet-blanket opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to stop you right there, as I've helped with taverns in other locations before. It's not just the location, but it is a huge factor. Saying it's purely the location is silly.

The tavern is only as popular as it is because of Location. I know it's possible to make a tavern popular in more isolated places, but it'd never be AS popular as if it was on the main road.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tavern is only as popular as it is because of Location. I know it's possible to make a tavern popular in more isolated places, but it'd never be AS popular as if it was on the main road.

 

True.

 

All the other taverns could be popular (but as you say, not as popular) but their owners aren't trying/doing the correct thing. Just placing a tavern in the town isn't going to make it active. I can think of 5 different ways off the top of my head to make the Petrus tavern popular, but I don't see any action coming from them.

 

But back to the topic at hand, vote no exemptions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Racial capitals should be the only place allowed to be annihilated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That road tavern is popular because of its location and it's location alone. Same with the standing inn. Any plot in that area is bound to sink the most RP.

 

Let's not kid ourselves by pretending it's anything else.

 

You say you'd like more capital rp but I don't see you roleplaying in Petrus creating fun, so what would make people want to go there, the tavern is just busy cause there is fun to be had and it's a nice enviroment.

I'd have to follow through and agree with Alakabam with this. RP is what you make it out to be. Even as nations FAR from the main road as unlike other nation capitals, both Salvus and the Caliphate have accumulated a great amount of regular 'tavern rp' or so you call it. Nothing is stopping any nation from attracting people to their capitals with new ideals and fun RP. Simply removing another plot that have managed to successfully do this is absurd and unfair to those that have worked to make it into what it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Racial capitals should be the only place allowed to be annihilated.

 

I like this option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have to follow through and agree with Alakabam with this. RP is what you make it out to be. Even as nations FAR from the main road as unlike other nation capitals, both Salvus and the Caliphate have accumulated a great amount of regular 'tavern rp' or so you call it. Nothing is stopping any nation from attracting people to their capitals with new ideals and fun RP. Simply removing another plot that have managed to successfully do this is absurd and unfair to those that have worked to make it into what it is.

It's location. In the scarlet lotus tavern's case, most of the people who RP there belong to other nations, I see mostly elves and oreners in there with a few dwarves and order clerics. They gather there because of where the tavern is, and because everyone else gathers there. It's a vicious cycle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that Petrus isn't attracting any rp but there are several other capitals such as Cerulin who could be blooming much more than taverns rn, and taverns are a large component when it comes to straining. 

Ever considered there are people who are not afflicted with any nation? I see quite a few of them at the lotus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Racial capitals should be the only place allowed to be annihilated.

That's where most of the wars happens so yes I agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as I'd love to see taverns removed from the main road, that's not the issue at hand.

LoTC is a game. Realistic resolutions have to make may for considerations as to what will be enjoyed.

War can make it more fun for some, and less for some. Forced conquest can work, but it can also fail miserably. A total system where the winner can do whatever he pleases failed in Asulon. Since then, the playerbase has only further declined in quality.

That said, enforcing rule over an occupied nation? If monitored and done right, it could bolster rp for everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moved to The Great Library. It shall be sorted into the appropriate category shortly.

 

If you feel this is a mistake, please contact myself or any FM and we'll restore it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...