When Science Goes Too Far

[Zindran 590]

Why the flying **** was this even brought up ._.

[hexe 2]

 

[EdgyMagey 787]

3 hours ago, drfate786 said:

What if, scientists somehow created an enzyme or virus made of human DNA that could enter a cell and replace damaged DNA. This would obviously reverse aging and allow for wounds to heal much faster,

 

But uh... the DNA part of the cell isn't the thing that ages... Neither does it get damaged when the organism is wounded...

[hexe 2]

Just now, EdgyMagey said:

 

But uh... the DNA part of the cell isn't the thing that ages... Neither does it get damaged when the organism is wounded...

listen to my best friend smarty pants

hes a relaly good smarty pants i love him dearly

[garentoft 9265]

PVP DEFAULT

[Neri 3590]

dude weed

[argonian 14254]

so is obama reptilian or not

[Taketheshot 3834]

This is crooked Hillary's work isnt it!!! SHE PUT YOU UP TO THIS.

 

And no. The exact replicas of humans are sooooooooooooooooo far from being practical. You completely ignored the fact that I put in stating that for every "perfect" copies there are several hundred monsters. Cloning humans is not in our future. And you show me a sliver of proof that US couples are using this advanced cloning methods to produce so called "clones" of themselves.

[drfate786 1690]

35 minutes ago, EdgyMagey said:

 

But uh... the DNA part of the cell isn't the thing that ages... Neither does it get damaged when the organism is wounded...

 

I never meant to say that a wound causes cell damage, aging changes the DNA and the elimination of that flaw would cure aging.

[EdgyMagey 787]

20 minutes ago, drfate786 said:

 

I never meant to say that a wound causes cell damage, aging changes the DNA and the elimination of that flaw would cure aging.

 

4 hours ago, drfate786 said:

What if, scientists somehow created an enzyme or virus made of human DNA that could enter a cell and replace damaged DNA. This would obviously reverse aging and allow for wounds to heal much faster

 

Yes, yes you did.

[Jygg 330]

[Thatpyrodude 2008]

sp00ky af

[GloriaPreussens 798]

3 hours ago, Birdnerdy said:

no....

Bubblegum lookin ass ****** 

[Pav33 101]

3 hours ago, drfate786 said:

3 hours ago, Taketheshot said:

The countries that haven't banned it dont have the capability to do it. The WHO sometimes gives out permits for limited cloning in an experiment but the ethical guidelines are insane. Yes in theory we can clone humans. But the fact is that we know jack **** about cloning in the grand scheme of things. For one successful relatively normal human clone you would have hundreds of mutilated and mutated humans that can barely survive. When we clone animals the ones that are damaged per say are destroyed. We cant do that with living people.

 

Wrong, many countries are capable of it and cloning IS being done. Just not in the way you think, It is possible to insert two times the number of chromosomes to produce a fetus that is an exact replica of it's host. So if I took two of your sperm cells and incubated them in a blank ovary to produce a zygote that zygote would be a near perfect duplicate of your chromosomes, the resulting baby/fetus would have to be incubated inside a woman and once born would look a lot like you with a few minor mutations.

 

This is already being done in the USA for couples that are unable to produce babies, one example of this is seen in women that miscarry sometimes or even in gay couples. It serves the purpose of weeding out genetic diseases that are becoming more and more common.

 

Edit:

 

I will also add that some scientists are trying to clone mammoths with this tactic:

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/woolly-mammoth-cloning-attempt-revives-ethical-debate-1.2867654

Dood, just stop. You've been reading too many controversies and sci-fi for you even to comprehend reality.

[DrakeHaze. 2524]

Can you be banned already, honestly. Its hard for me to have fun on the forums when I see this vomit.