Jump to content

Warclaim Lag Testing

 Share


Harri

Warclaim choices.  

75 members have voted

  1. 1. What system do you prefer/want to use right now?

    • I prefer the old, uncapped system.
      63
    • I prefer the new, 30 man cap system.
      12


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, HB_ said:

im not even a trial anymore are yu retarded

Please don't use that word on account of @VonAulus's uncle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, bungo said:

Please don't use that word on account of @VonAulus's uncle.

im so sorry. fixed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To anyone scared if this poll is the deciding factor, it's not, I'm just curious as to what people actually think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Harrison said, this is just for lag testing purposes. He requested permission to get players together for OOC testing on OOC problems. Nothing will be changed without prior discussions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont understand how being restricted to 30 players is fair in any way shape or form.

 

By that logic. In a grossly overexaggerated example, a faction of 90 could theoretically beat a faction of 900, just by the virtue of having better gear. Or just through simple luck.

 

Then again I can't find the actual rules because they weren't posted or were deleted according to some staff [?]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems unfair on factions that have built up large numbers. Sure they are able to send wave after wave at the other smaller faction, but they can't use tactics involving their whole force, like they should be. 

Obviously this is me speaking from an ideal situation where the server doesn't seem to suffer from so much more lag than others of its size. If the devs still don't have solutions then we're going to have to make some compromises.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Test the ******* server first. We didn't lag in the map end warzone at fights the server usually lags at. Make the vote AFTER it's been tested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SaintPaint said:

Test the ******* server first. We didn't lag in the map end warzone at fights the server usually lags at. Make the vote AFTER it's been tested.

 

58 minutes ago, HB_ said:

To anyone scared if this poll is the deciding factor, it's not, I'm just curious as to what people actually think.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Shalashask said:

Seems unfair on factions that have built up large numbers. Sure they are able to send wave after wave at the other smaller faction, but they can't use tactics involving their whole force, like they should be. 

Obviously this is me speaking from an ideal situation where the server doesn't seem to suffer from so much more lag than others of its size. If the devs still don't have solutions then we're going to have to make some compromises.

yeah, i think having multiple small battles is more trying to simulate longer battles, i.e. Gettysburg in the civil war, not battles like maybe Austerlitz where the battle only lasted a few hours, not like Gettysburg where it lasted a few days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just some advice for when you make an announcement post. Try to leave your personal views outside of official server announcements in the future. The server is a lot larger than "I".

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Malgonious said:

Stop.  No one wants another warclaimed that's going to evitably lag the **** out of the server.  The system in place makes for severely reduced lag battles and adds the need for more than a zerg of 1day players who log on just for war claims to boost their side in the lag fest. It was fixed for a reason, don't try and undo the advancement the community made together for the voices of the few.

 

 

Speak for yourself, others and I do not wish to waste the weekend doing three warclaims, one warclaim is much more manageable and less time consuming than three. And do not come back at me with "Warclaims do not last that long."  sieges do take a while, also the lead-up and getting prepared for wc's in itself is time consuming ((The resource gathering, the crafting and ofc the organization.))  So that has to be repeated for three days instead of one people on this server are no longer 16 to spend that amount of time into this ridiculous system when there is an obvious fix to the lag issue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Whimsylicious said:

Just some advice for when you make an announcement post. Try to leave your personal views outside of official server announcements in the future. The server is a lot larger than "I".

#empowered #blacklivesmatter

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Teegah said:

poll is pretty much Oren? or Dreadlander?

ooga booga

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...