rukio

"Isn't this a bit of the pot calling the kettle black, given how long Borok was a vampyr aiding Serheim? Or how long he aided Morur'ei and brought heralds to him to kill? Perhaps Borok and this new Rex are also helping the darkspawn. What do I care." Inquires a pallid elf towards someone else before shrugging. "Not my pony, not my circus."

"I'm certain Lefkos would beg the differ on existences, or lack thereof." Responds Nehtamo after delivering a fresh batch of cookies to the elfess. A moderate smirk of amusement at his own wit lingered on his face. "How does the song go? He and his dragon-wife lay in Athera, guarding their clutch of eggs?"

It was all a plot...

I originally had a suggested redline to require it to show a noticeable tell but opted to omit that due to the lore specifying that that subsection wouldn't require them.

Previous: Purposed change: Removal of the spell Alternatively: Proposed change: Changes in redlines Or Function shift from Combative to non-combative Redline being removed/needing adjusting: -Hemorrhaging can be cast at any time, regardless of combat, but can have no impact on it. It is a primarily aesthetic ability. Whilst blood lost from any type of bleed can be as aesthetically gruesome and as copious as the victim decides, nosebleeds, bleeding ears, eyes, gums and coughed up blood as a result of hemorrhaging will not physically harm victims past very functionally negligible blood loss and feelings of discomfort. Redline additions proposed (pick and choose what you like ST): -Unable to be cast if the blood mage has been wounded significantly (i.e. bleeding more than hemorrhaging itself would cause: An open wound, a blow to the head, so on, so forth. -Hemorrhaging is a primarily aesthetic ability. Blood lost as a result of hemorrhaging will not physically harm victims past very functional negligible blood loss and feelings of discomfort.

Ye the second half was a T3 + a T3 = T5, while 4 + 4 also = 5, had me confused. Thank you for the clarification.

How does this math work?

Axios fast travel + fast travel rules.

Ayo nice and based

It's also possible to have a detailed and good character that you're attached to, as long as you acknowledge it for what it is, a character. I'm sorry you haven't experienced a character yet that made you feel the same way, but I understand what Tiger means. Some personas are easy to get attached to in the same way you get attached to a book character. You can root for them, you can sympathize with their plight OOC, you can even cry for what they go through. It doesn't mean you're OOCly going to manipulate the narrative in their favor. What do I know though, I also think people should PK on first death unless they're a new player. Especially if it's a conflict-based persona or a spy, etc. People attached to their community or character rarely ever will. And before you reply citing the Norland ordeal: I was fine with the RP and intended to PK, I was not cool with the OOC aggression being flung my way by several people (not you).

>sees a mention on my name >sweat >open topic >smile Nice post :)

To be completely honest, the way the safety guidelines are currently written would, if I were a parent, make me not want my children anywhere near the server. It feels half done and more focused on 'what should you report' with scattered pieces of copied information from websites that aren't really applicable to the LotC medium such as: How would any of the above be a factor in LotC grooming beyond the last sentence? I would like to see a more customized and tailored safety policy, something not a copy-paste from online safety sites. Make it more applicable, more appropriate for the average player, give better examples of how grooming on LotC works, not how a boy scout leader gets a position surrounded by minors or what have you. I agree that we need a more solid layout of who would have access to the report, the information, what steps would be taken. I'd even like to see how they will prove reports aren't falsified in the future, given that the only one cited as falsified wasn't caught as a fake until I pointed out the second tab in her browser while reading the report after it'd been sent to me by one of the people who filed it. I also think that communication needs to be improved. My report was denied due to the evidence being ancient and lacking concrete proof i.e., the ERP logs. Frill was banned for posting the same logs that were later used to ban KP. A conversation with both parties by admins finally cemented KP's ban. Imagine if that talk had occurred when it first was reported. Yet it was a learning experience and I do not fault the administration for it, they have improved leaps and bounds from the days of shock value pedo scandal threads. Nor do I blame those who made those posts, they were a necessary evil to force admins to act in a time people felt nothing was being done, though I'm sure investigation was merely slow and thorough, given the life ruining ability of such accusations against someone. All in all, I agree fully with this topic and I'm glad to see it was unhidden. The current safety guidelines are a good baby step, but the community needs more. The community deserves better.

I think you mean thank you Frill for driving this initiative....

Think he means before a blast pot explodes

Based alchemy nerfs.