Jump to content

CARRINGTON v. SUNHOLDT


Papa Liam

Recommended Posts

SUBPOENA

15 H.F. 1751

 

Green Carrington

Carrington & Carrington Company

Eugene Bracchus, Attorney, OWF

 

DESIRES TO SUMMON THE FOLLOWING PARTY TO COURT;

 

The Duke Sunholdt KCHE

 

ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLE(S), DOCTRINE(S), EDICT(S) OR ARTICLES OF LAW:

 

Table IV, 2.1, Imperial Law Book

“The promise of the delivery of a thing is a promise of delivery of the thing with all fitting entirely, even if not so mentioned.”

 

Table IV, 2.2, Imperial Law Book

“If a person obliged to do something has not done it, it is ordered to be done at his expense.”

 

Plaintiff formed a contract with defendant, agreeing to supply drinks and service in the form of bartenders for a party. Both parties agreed to a contract of 1,000 Imperial marks for services rendered.

 

When plaintiff sought payment as owed, defendant refused, claiming plaintiff offered poor services. Defending party then paid less than half, 450 Imperial marks.

 

Plaintiff desires fulfillment of entire contract.

 

WITH THE PRESENCE OF THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT PARTY OR PARTIES:

 

Mary Philippa d’Arkent

 

ON THE DESIRED DATE OF:

[[To be discussed on Discord.]]


 

YOURS HUMBLY,

Green Carrington

6 Nauzica Square, Helena

[[chump#9532]]

[[Liam#7649]]

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Back in my day, you would have paid the full contract, then murder him in the back-alleys and get your payment back!” An old gypsy murmurs, moving his long bangs back over his pink headband

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mary makes a new hat for her court appearance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On behalf of the Western Circuit, I accept this request for judicial intervention. I, Sir Fiske Petyr Vanir, will be presiding over this case. You have two saints days to contact me in order to set up a date for the hearing. 

 

[[Discord: Connor#0320]]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jasper Carrington, whos family was bombarded with several allegations of vandalism and thievery of the defendants’ retail property, would refute these hurtful claims. However, he was confronted outside the aforementioned shop alongside his lawyer Friedrich Stafyr, to where the defendants collectively wished to come to a settlement agreement. 

 

In lieu of a trial, both parties have come to amicable agreement. Let it publicly be recognized, this subpoena and court trial is rendered null and void. 

Signed, Jasper Carrington

Link to post
Share on other sites

Red laughs as he drinks his black 

"That'll show the buggers not to be a twonk when signing a contract"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...