-
Posts
7097 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Everything posted by argonian
-
gotta harvest my vortex nodes to get my vortex clothes to craft my vortex tin i got from a vortex furnace using vortex ore from vortex nodes into vortex tin tools using other vortex tools
-
why are there so few black characters on lotc
i'm not even memeing but like you'd think there'd be way more than there are(are there any rn???)
-
why is there a kingdom of norland subforum in the kingdom of norland subforum
-
is it powergaming for female characters to not be irresistibly attracted to dwarven men
-
-
what is even the difference between aenguls and daemons in lore nowadays
- Show previous comments 8 more
-
Huh, never realised Aemon and Daemon were explained. So wtf did Aemon mean or who/what was he/it?
And yeah I didn't mean that Dragur wasn't explicitly a Daemon in lore, just that I saw him being described as an Aengul in some posts because the distinction is rather vague/unknown rn.
I think it's important to create a sustainable framework and then just stick with it for better or worse. I've said this before in much less polite terms ik, but like it's just bad writing to sweep away old lore whenever it's inconvenient or backs us into a corner. I'm glad you've been looking into ancient **** so much because that's a dedication to consistency, but I think Aengudaemons and the Void in particular are prime examples of places where "new management" in the Lore Team(like 501F0Rehead) has historically led to mass cullings and contradictions of old lore to propel us in a new creative direction, even when it wasn't really necessary. Like I get that a lot of the timeit has to happen, but if things were kept more static rather than Flamboyant crusades to delete all lore because **** it, it'd encourage a lot more people to interact with and learn it. At least in my opinion; my derisive view and inattention towards it has always been because of a cynicism that it'll have changed by the time I read it.
Anyway, enough of a rant and thanks if you got through that, but like please whatever distinctions or whatever you decide upon, try to stick with them no matter what even if they become awkward to write with.
-
The towers were mentioned as holding the daemon league of evil basically lmfao. From what I understood.
But yeah I'm all for just acknowledging old stuff. The entire Inferi eventline was wiping the mathic age so we wouldn't be written into a corner by 501s interpretation and enforcement of it. Void is a mess, but the very least thing I'm trying to do is to bring back the older concepts of Aengudaemonica and fusing them with modern ones. A really nice facelift overall, since the current resources are insanely lacking and annoying.
Just scared of writing people into a corner, since I'm not going to be around forever and neither is this team. I want to make it as digestible as possible so future people don't go "lol I don't like this let's scrap it"
good to talk to u when u arent foaming at the mouth because you genuinely have good opinions about **** (some of the time)