The administration needs intervention

[Jihnyny 2643]

So finally people began to take notice

society

 

freewud

freegarlik

[subatomic 1107]

24 minutes ago, rukio said:

What did you expect after Nectorist and Narthok? 

what the flip man

[rukio 8913]

4 minutes ago, capybara said:

 

haha guys I made a joke out of the holocaust get baited

 

I love you rukio but that isn't good vibes

Don't even know who you are sorry

[satinkira 6270]

Just now, rukio said:

Don't even know who you are sorry

 

I'm satinkira

[Altered 79]

Administration should step down at this point. Iblees wasn't casted into the void but instead the administration. Rip lotc

[rukio 8913]

14 minutes ago, Slorbin said:

-snip-

[L0rdLawyer 2271]

Just now, Faded_Dragon89 said:

Administration should step down at this point. Iblees wasn't casted into the void but instead the administration. Rip lotc

 

Cope and seethe. 

 

Server ruining behavior was punished and you cry about admins enforcing rules.

 

******* cope and seethe.

[Hephaestus 1317]

ngl i miss when there were rp posts on popular topics

[Altered 79]

17 minutes ago, L0rdLawyer said:

 

Cope and seethe. 

 

Server ruining behavior was punished and you cry about admins enforcing rules.

 

******* cope and seethe.

I think we should be pushing to see exactly what got her banned thoroughly instead of a vague reason. What specific rule did they break? What was the evidence submitted against them? This isn't a ban that makes sense for the evidence to be quietly swept under the rug to keep confidential information since it's literally just banter or toxicity depending on the view and context which we have 0 about. I don't believe we should just take the staff's word for it no matter if we hate or like the person in the community. 

[rukio 8913]

Just now, Faded_Dragon89 said:

I think we should be pushing to see exactly what got her banned thoroughly instead of a vague reason. What specific rule did they break? What was the evidence submitted against them? This isn't a ban that makes sense for the evidence to be quietly swept under the rug to keep confidential information since it's literally just banter or toxicity depending on the view and context which we have 0 about. I don't believe we should just take the staff's word for it no matter if we hate or like the person in the community. 

That's the issue though. You can't see the evidence because the person(s) who posted the report might be targeted by the banned player/their friends. We can't actually KNOW anything beyond what we're told at face value because of that risk, regardless of how true or false it is. 

[Altered 79]

1 minute ago, rukio said:

That's the issue though. You can't see the evidence because the person(s) who posted the report might be targeted by the banned player/their friends. We can't actually KNOW anything beyond what we're told at face value because of that risk, regardless of how true or false it is. 

Fair point.

[L0rdLawyer 2271]

2 minutes ago, Faded_Dragon89 said:

I think we should be pushing to see exactly what got her banned thoroughly instead of a vague reason. What specific rule did they break? What was the evidence submitted against them? This isn't a ban that makes sense for the evidence to be quietly swept under the rug to keep confidential information since it's literally just banter or toxicity depending on the view and context which we have 0 about. I don't believe we should just take the staff's word for it no matter if we hate or like the person in the community. 

They were banned for harassing people.

 

Let's just reveal who reported them so everyone who is lacking brain cells can harass the players that made the report.

 

Squak revealed a lot of details. The player in question harmed lotc by trying to nuke multiple communities. An example is Twi tried to barter oocly with krugmar to destroy haelunor. When krugmar refused. They engaged in a rp war based on ooc hatred. 

 

[Laeonathan 4193]

1 hour ago, 1_Language_1 said:

bro I don't believe this, this ain't like Twi at all.

 

Also free LunaBurnFire, y'all falsely banned them as some random-ass alt even though they didn't have a PC until just recently <img src=">

 

Stop using Community Guidelines as a shit excuse to ban like y'all been doing recently.. y'all banned Spiders for "Slander" but never actually proved it was slander, y'all banned Twi for "harassment", even tho there are many people y'all could have banned for harassment.. but you let them run free? 

 

Free my boy Monke, stop trying to use moderation tools to kill playerbases you don't like--

It is Twi - joking around.

 

I talked to her daily the past few weeks and 90% of what she said ooc was some silly joke.

[1_Language_1 1671]

46 minutes ago, Laeonathan said:

It is Twi - joking around.

 

I talked to her daily the past few weeks and 90% of what she said ooc was some silly joke.

 

Oh no, I know when Twi does it, it's a joke. 

 

I meant that this isn't Twi in terms of it being serious and harassing 

[sami03 387]

Why dont you post some screens of staff targeting caelionr or whatever its called. Both parties are only talking without proof.

 

Also kinda sus that certain people start to spam statues once a player gets banned.

 

Also sus that a purity elf nation vassals under orks without there being ooc involved. Or sus that any nation declares war without ooc being involved.