-
Posts
2157 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Status Updates posted by Archbishop
-
how come the ST and LT don’t bother with any major story arcs anymore?
-
why did my chest unlock itself?
Edited by Archbishop -
and yet you still try to argue staff aren’t protecting you LOL
-
44 charters will be deleted?
Edited by Archbishop -
you can’t link somebodies account to a banned player who has a history of toxicity and will most likely share it for malicious purposes and claim it was innocent, why else would you send it if nor for malicious purposes?
-
being a guard isn’t villainy LOL
do you people even know what villain blacklists are for?
- Show previous comments 12 more
-
@KeatonUnbeatenActuall prior to my trial, i had just entered the city and was headed to my house. You saw me in the palace AFTER the trial, when I was trying to get to MY ROOM in the palace, hoping to get my stuff, but found difficulty doing so as the way in was obstructed.
Your accusations that I only had that character to scout Haense is completely false, I actively played Peter prior to the war. He held a position in Haense for a reason.
To you goes the same question as went to Adam. Are you ignorant of the facts or are you just trying to spread misinformation?
To shoah, there’s a difference between just arresting someone for breaking a law, and randomly arresting someone, and then when told to stop by someone with a higher rank, attacking both me and the person with the higher rank in response.
-
And here I thought that gms were meant to get both sides of a story before making a verdict, not one side.
-
So what actually are the ‘requirements’ for posting public staff reports. Some have been left public like Deer_ and Pun. Why were they left public but not ours?
-
Why would you change the chat plugin when there was nothing wrong with it, you’ve just made it way too over complicated. Way to keep new players!
-
why thread removed?
-
when an actual rp thread gets removed for why??
-
Ban length times should be a set time depending on the rule, not the person.
-
The way bans currently work is that certain infractions are assigned to a group based on severity. From this, a players history based on the previous infractions of this nature are taken into consideration and a suggested ban length time range is given by a sheet based on this. Obviously, the ban length time for first time offenders, if there even is a ban handed out, is much lighter than the suggested range for a repeat offender.
-