Completed Requests
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 791 views
-
-
- 3 replies
- 368 views
-
- 3 replies
- 582 views
-
- 3 replies
- 746 views
-
- 3 replies
- 820 views
-
- 3 replies
- 555 views
-
- 3 replies
- 653 views
-
- 3 replies
- 563 views
-
- 3 replies
- 615 views
-
- 3 replies
- 804 views
-
- 3 replies
- 553 views
-
- 3 replies
- 738 views
-
- 3 replies
- 606 views
-
- 3 replies
- 890 views
-
- 3 replies
- 646 views
-
- 3 replies
- 421 views
-
- 3 replies
- 257 views
-
- 3 replies
- 627 views
-
- 3 replies
- 756 views
-
- 3 replies
- 325 views
-
- 3 replies
- 543 views
-
- 3 replies
- 472 views
-
- 3 replies
- 558 views
-
- 3 replies
- 348 views
-
- 3 replies
- 595 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
