Thales: Racial Bonuses

[Neri 3590]

 

Human's with all their % ****, are currently better smiths than Dwarves...

And their combat boost for every 4 humans, means they can 1 shot people, if there is enough of them.

 

 

It's capped rather than exponentially increasing with the number of humans. You won't get people being oneshotted, I know that for sure.

[hex37 737]

It's not making lore, it's following it.

 

Semantics.

[Cyndikate 2303]

Keep in mind you have to add buffs that revolve around the human population. Tech was right to be careful, because the humans are fully capable of holding their own in wars against the rest of the server, and have done so in the past. That was without gimmicky buffs. Imagine implementing careless buffs on them. It'd be ridiculous.

[Dyrr 137]

Was this ever answered? Like, for those playing magical constructs, creatures, nonconformist races, etc., will GMs be able to set a custom name to mask over a race’s buffs/debuffs? So, for example, a Shade can still list themselves as such in their bio whilst also having access to their elven racial perks.

 

Yes, I believe they can do that. For my Troll charactor, I set my race to Olog and had a GM change my race to Troll. I still had the Olog perks.

[Dyrr 137]

It's capped rather than exponentially increasing with the number of humans. You won't get people being oneshotted, I know that for sure.

 

Lol, sure. You do realise Oren gets pocket-gm's to spawn in Flame Aspect/Sharpness V swords, right?

 

[Edit: Apologies for double post.]

[hellfiazz 879]

Semantics.

 

Making and following are totally different words. :)

[calculusdesola 1658]

Lol, sure. You do realise Oren gets pocket-gm's to spawn in Flame Aspect/Sharpness V swords, right?

 

[Edit: Apologies for double post.]

 

 

I can't quite tell if you're being serious or joking about the times the assorted deep front pocket dwarf GM crew did that.

 

I cringed.

[Dyrr 137]

Was just joking, but in all honesty, I've seen both sides of this war having many fire aspect/sharpness swords. Can't Gm's or whatever just not spawn them in? It's very ridiculous. 

[Hiebe 2493]

I can't quite tell if you're being serious or joking about the times the assorted deep front pocket dwarf GM crew did that.

I cringed.

Only that relates on that to actual use is sharp one and unbreaking. And hell I dont think any dwarf had that before the humans lol

Hammer of Urguan FTW

[Anderssn 1115]

@Robo: I have an Oren character and two Alrasian characters so I'm neutral in these things. Both sides have their "pocket gms" but I have not seen anything too bad on either sides. I had a sword with Fire aspect and knockback 2 but the fire and one knockback lvl got removed. Both sides have their op swords and gms :p

[IevIr4d 29]

Add Strelt pls 

[hex37 737]

Add Strelt pls 

 

 

b-but the strelt's perk is already implimented:

 

Make Remove: lose any special subrace bonus, and be a normal hunan. Deus Vult.

[AlmondTree 418]

b-but the strelt's perk is already implimented:

 

Make Remove: lose any special subrace bonus, and be a normal hunan. Deus Vult.

 

 

[Narthok 10416]

It's because we aren't trying to make a huge splash like the Snow Elves and are regrouping for 4.0. There is a clan/family currently in Alras and I know TapeSauce and a few others have clans roaming about.

 

We are making a huge splash? I thought we were being quiet ;(

 

I think the current buffs and debuffs are quite balanced and adhere as closely to lore as is possible without being ridiculously op

[Dyrr 137]

@Robo: I have an Oren character and two Alrasian characters so I'm neutral in these things. Both sides have their "pocket gms" but I have not seen anything too bad on either sides. I had a sword with Fire aspect and knockback 2 but the fire and one knockback lvl got removed. Both sides have their op swords and gms :p

 

Same, and you're correct. The server should get rid of these pocket gm's.