Few Points Addressed

[Urasept 1361]

Greetings Lord of the Craft. 

 

Today we have some things to share with you as a result of our latest GM meeting. We’ve reviewed the your view’s and have given a response to the ones that seemed more pressing. This does not mean we did not look at other Your View’s, however these were the ones that popped out in a more pronounced fashion, or were repeated amongst a few threads. This is not all that was discussed, just what is needed to be posted.

 

Nexus plots- GMs can and will discuss a plot if it is not being utilized for more than holding land. Should an agreement come to pass that it is this way they can motion to revoke ownership of the plot to open the land up for someone else to use it. If this happens and chests or materials will be considered forfeit and will be claimable by the new plot owner. Again this is for land that is not being used for more than holding land. 

 

Don’t ban for PMs - This will not be happening. If you are on the server you are to be abiding by the rules set in place that should have been read. This being said, if you are on the server, forums, and ts we expect and will hold you to following them. Should you say something that has been determined not to be said / done you should expect what comes from your actions.

 

Alternate accounts - It was once set in that we would only be banning alt accounts of banned players with blatant evidence, such as a matching IP. Well, now we will be moving this a step forward. If a GM is sure that an account is the alt of a banned player, it can be banned. If a GM is witness of skype logs first hand, as in they see it posted or hear it by the banned player themselves, and not through a middleman (AKA quote, gyazo, voice recording, etc) they have the authority to ban you.

 

 

Anti-cheat - This will not be a thing. Apparently it is really laggy and bad for the server. However as we have a larger Moderating team we can be in more places to watch for said cheats / hacks. 

 

Mods we allow on the server - (now keep in mind this can change at any time to add or remove a mod if it’s of any benefit or being abused at any time) With that being said, the list we allow are:

 

Schematica, More Player Models (or MPM), InventoryTweaks (W/o Auto armor), Damage Indicators, Minimaps (Rei’s, Journeymap, etc.) aesthetic mods.

 

Autofish is only allowed should you be roleplaying. If you simply plan on going AFK while using it, you will be kicked.

 

If you have any suggestions or ideas to mods that we did not cover that are non-harmful you may send them to a member of the moderating team VIA forum PM to bring it up for further discussion.

 

VPNs - If you have a vpn on, and a gm requests you to pop it off for a verification of your identity you should comply. Failure to do so will be seen as hiding something, such as being an alt account of a banned player. And as such could find yourself in a situation that may be less than pleasant. Players however can be approved for the use of VPNs.

[1 1393]

Wait auto fish is allowed...?

[Heff 2460]

Wait auto fish is allowed...?

^^^ some1 got banned for autofish i think it was kraal

[Althidon 16]

3rd

 

Sounds good to me.

[ausbrig renegade 238]

Yeah The Jew got banned for autofishing but its allowed.... oy vey anti semitism at its finest.

[Cyndikate 2303]

 

 

Don’t ban for PMs - This will not be happening. If you are on the server you are to be abiding by the rules set in place that should have been read. This being said, if you are on the server, forums, and ts we expect and will hold you to following them. Should you say something that has been determined not to be said / done you should expect what comes from your actions.

Then you should inform us why it was in place to begin with, besides cybering.

[DrakeHaze. 2524]

Auto-fish is now allowed. Too bad grapple hook is gone so fishing is actually the second most useless profession coded. Rip in kill, it could of been a good day.

[bungo 3965]

this is so useless.

 

you cant have a second minecraft account.  unless i'm reading this wrong then please word it better.

in terms of nexus plots, i cant wait for even more keeps in oren!

 

t.gmteam

[Space 2335]

VPN stuff is fishy; VPNs have legitimate usages outside of alting, and to make you remove it for a bit could affect that stuff.

 

Also, even though I am against the PM banning, I think that you guys will never stop monitoring that ****. What I would like to see is the 'common sense' rule being applied to PMs and potentially rule-breaking language. You know, using common sense as to decide whether the two friends are OK with joking around or if the person is truly sending a mean message, you know?

[Devland99 180]

 

Nexus plots- GMs can and will discuss a plot if it is not being utilized for more than holding land. Should an agreement come to pass that it is this way they can motion to revoke ownership of the plot to open the land up for someone else to use it. If this happens and chests or materials will be considered forfeit and will be claimable by the new plot owner. Again this is for land that is not being used for more than holding land. 

 

If this is the case a gm better not have the power to claim it for some god forbid purpose

[Ricky 321]

Nexus plots- GMs can and will discuss a plot if it is not being utilized for more than holding land. Should an agreement come to pass that it is this way they can motion to revoke ownership of the plot to open the land up for someone else to use it. If this happens and chests or materials will be considered forfeit and will be claimable by the new plot owner. Again this is for land that is not being used for more than holding land.

 

 

Quite literally GM's are now by the Rules able undermine nation RP and devide up the land into a clusterd wreck of bad builds and 50 towns with 20 houses and only 5 people. It is a literall decentralisation of RP and undermining of the very idea of a Nation. And will only lead to groups like Oren routenly warcaliming every week to counter these movments. This is a move in the wrong direction for sure.

[nordicg_d 1847]

Alt accounts? Like... undeclared alts? Or any secondary account in general? If it's for any alt it'll cause quite a few problems.

 

what do you think...

[Rael 935]

this is so useless.

 

you cant have a second minecraft account.  unless i'm reading this wrong then please word it better.

in terms of nexus plots, i cant wait for even more keeps in oren!

 

t.gmteam

This section was perhaps a bit confusing, but I took the liberty of editing it to mend that. What it means, in short, is that if a GM gets evidence firsthand through skype, gyazo, teamspeak, or what have you, he/she has the authority to ban the alt of that banned player.

 

It is still perfectly okay for unbanned players to use alts, though they should of course be registered with the main account to keep things organized.

[Birdwhisperer 1174]

 

Nexus plots- GMs can and will discuss a plot if it is not being utilized for more than holding land. Should an agreement come to pass that it is this way they can motion to revoke ownership of the plot to open the land up for someone else to use it. If this happens and chests or materials will be considered forfeit and will be claimable by the new plot owner. Again this is for land that is not being used for more than holding land.

This really shouldn't be a thing... If someone is legitimately able to hold onto a region they should be able to do what they want with it, including leaving it as natural land.

[Fireheart 2777]

Sweet, nice to know some more stone set guidelines!