UnBaed 8966 Share Posted June 5, 2020 finally i can share my memes.... Spoiler 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gustando 1458 Share Posted June 5, 2020 Heh... not bad... not bad at all.... pretty good, infact. I like it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BonesOfTheEarth 1599 Share Posted June 5, 2020 “usInG THe NAme Of tHe LoRe PieCE Is mETAgaMIng” Why name the creature siliti if you have the redline that using that name is metagaming? I like the lore but that’s stupid. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladuos 857 Share Posted June 5, 2020 2 hours ago, BonesOfTheEarth said: “usInG THe NAme Of tHe LoRe PieCE Is mETAgaMIng” Why name the creature siliti if you have the redline that using that name is metagaming? I like the lore but that’s stupid. How do you upvote something more than once? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malaise 1569 Share Posted June 5, 2020 i am torn between good writing and the fact that there will now be three classes of vampires on lord of the craft, which greatly diminishes the wonder and mystery of the idea of immortal blood drinkers 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of The Moon 5153 Share Posted June 5, 2020 17 minutes ago, Malaise said: i am torn between good writing and the fact that there will now be three classes of vampires on lord of the craft, which greatly diminishes the wonder and mystery of the idea of immortal blood drinkers Dreori have been self denied. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarsies 6075 Author Share Posted June 5, 2020 3 hours ago, BonesOfTheEarth said: “usInG THe NAme Of tHe LoRe PieCE Is mETAgaMIng” Why name the creature siliti if you have the redline that using that name is metagaming? I like the lore but that’s stupid. 47 minutes ago, Gladuos said: How do you upvote something more than once? “Bait, essentially. The name is an insult by Malghourn so the Archons and their bloodlines wouldn’t refer to themselves as such (”slaves”), and IRP will likely use another term if not just a word (vampire or something akin). Because of that, if the word every appears in-game it can be immediately called out as metagaming and ideally acted upon.” It’s big brain if anything. Look at animii. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladuos 857 Share Posted June 5, 2020 10 minutes ago, Zarsies said: “Bait, essentially. The name is an insult by Malghourn so the Archons and their bloodlines wouldn’t refer to themselves as such (”slaves”), and IRP will likely use another term if not just a word (vampire or something akin). Because of that, if the word every appears in-game it can be immediately called out as metagaming and ideally acted upon.” It’s big brain if anything. Look at animii. I don’t care for the bait. Usually it’s just trolling by having a name no one is allowed to use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of The Moon 5153 Share Posted June 5, 2020 3 hours ago, BonesOfTheEarth said: “usInG THe NAme Of tHe LoRe PieCE Is mETAgaMIng” Why name the creature siliti if you have the redline that using that name is metagaming? I like the lore but that’s stupid. Why have any lore that can’t be metagamed, by that logic? Information should be obtained IC. People should have their own cultural distinctions and in-character beliefs about what a magic/ creature is called and how they think it works that is distinct from their OOC knowledge obtained from the forums. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScreamingDingo 17003 Share Posted June 5, 2020 1 hour ago, Gladuos said: I don’t care for the bait. Usually it’s just trolling by having a name no one is allowed to use. 4 hours ago, BonesOfTheEarth said: “usInG THe NAme Of tHe LoRe PieCE Is mETAgaMIng” Why name the creature siliti if you have the redline that using that name is metagaming? I like the lore but that’s stupid. insanely small brain take to just take information from ooc forum posts and use it IC the creature has to be called something, it doesn't mean that name has to be forced and used rply. 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladuos 857 Share Posted June 5, 2020 1 minute ago, ScreamingDingo said: insanely small brain take to just take information from ooc forum posts and use it IC the creature has to be called something, it doesn't mean that name has to be forced and used rply. Of course, it’s just pointless to name it anything if it’s never utilized. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScreamingDingo 17003 Share Posted June 6, 2020 35 minutes ago, Gladuos said: Of course, it’s just pointless to name it anything if it’s never utilized. what would you say when wanting to refer to the lore then ooc’ly? The no name IC is an approach that needs to be utilised more to force players to actually think about their interactions and meet these types of creatures. Instead of situations as of recent like Sutica declaring that ‘all strigae’ are good to become citizens, when its a term that hasn’t been used for like 50 years and isn’t even used among the creatures. may aswell just name all lore [??????] ooc’ly then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nozgoth 2897 Share Posted June 6, 2020 oooo very nice work 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slayy 816 Share Posted June 6, 2020 14 minutes ago, ScreamingDingo said: what would you say when wanting to refer to the lore then ooc’ly? The no name IC is an approach that needs to be utilised more to force players to actually think about their interactions and meet these types of creatures. Instead of situations as of recent like Sutica declaring that ‘all strigae’ are good to become citizens, when its a term that hasn’t been used for like 50 years and isn’t even used among the creatures. may aswell just name all lore [??????] ooc’ly then I couldn’t agree more on this. As a new player years ago, I had made a mistake that the knowledge present on the wiki and forums were known as public knowledge. (Luckly I asked a GM about this information and they told me it was just for ooc and not rp). It was foolish and dumb. However, by creating this rule, it would push new players and old players in a set of roleplay that would focus more on interaction and meaningful experiences instead of ‘what can happen and can I get’ and ‘i know because everyone knows.’ 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladuos 857 Share Posted June 6, 2020 On 6/5/2020 at 8:02 PM, ScreamingDingo said: what would you say when wanting to refer to the lore then ooc’ly? The no name IC is an approach that needs to be utilised more to force players to actually think about their interactions and meet these types of creatures. Instead of situations as of recent like Sutica declaring that ‘all strigae’ are good to become citizens, when its a term that hasn’t been used for like 50 years and isn’t even used among the creatures. may aswell just name all lore [??????] ooc’ly then I respect the idea, but I’d just name it something that would be a prevalent name in server lore. EDIT: On a separate note, I did really enjoy reading this lore. It fits seamlessly with other aspects of the server’s lore. The theme is good, and I enjoy the indepth multi-versal aspects of it. +1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts