ImCookiie

"H-Hey guys, please report to us any bad members of the community, we-we will ban them, promise!" - Staff (probably)

This post highlights why I feel most of the community sometimes struggle to take evidence or straight up report what happens to them, time and time again players have been actively let down by the people in charge meant to protect them, letting the excuse of 'due process' cover them from having to do anything and hope the matter somehow magically resolves itself. I honestly have no idea how sometimes people get the book thrown at them instantly when they **** up, then other times someone has to put themselves in the firing line by making a big public forum post to expose some of this shit that happens.

 

what's a song u could listen to on loop for hours?

mine is 

Listen, you're a roleplayer

I'm a roleplayer

we roleplay

Potato, tomato

Hakuna Matata

Elad currently halfway to being Edad

💅slay

you smell 

STOP! eating Granny Smith Apples. THey ARE Made from an OLD WOMANS Bones!!! REPOST this to save a life.

um yes queen skinny legend versace boots the house down slay queen hunty mama and oop daddy work charli xcx ****** my wig

Who is holding your leash?

I believe, being racist is good (in minecraft)

Have a question for staff

      There is a post about a elven seed (the puerokars) that, though I wasn't the founder, I was one of the original members. 

       In short, I'd like to update the lore a bit (just clarification and adding small details like minor traditions.) I'm wondering if I can just make a clarification post and link the original and have to get it approved or can I just submit an update?

<3

I don't know if my application went trough or not... but I really hope it did!

everything wrong with the server one way or another relates to @Heero

i wet the bed

Ten days to look at a ban appeal? Smh lotc, do better.

Ten days to look at a ban appeal? Smh lotc, do better.

Man. 

Wish me luck, I just sent my application in! :]

I got a question on banning players during investigations, why is only one side banned even if there’s evidence against the original accuser?  Think most people know the sticky situation I speak of, I’m curious of the reasoning for this route in handling an issue.  Banning the accused and keeping them banned despite the clear possibility of their innocence seems like you’ve already decided to stick with what was first presented to you, even if it could have been false.

Can a blue tag monkey remove some of my old warnings like mirtok promised would happen? Cheers! 

Hot Take: Bring back bandit applications.

So people can do more as a bandit, and also remove the ability of new players to accidently get themselves banned

Unpopular opinion: Playing with nametags off is actually pretty fun

how do u dye leather horse armor on lotc?  *big smile*

I hope the rebellion and coup rules coming out #soon turn out well

Sucks it took this long though. I wish we were able to get good rules for this stuff set in stone earlier when the Sedan revolt was happening (since there clearly was a need for some rebellion rules in that instance).