Completed Requests
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 666 views
-
-
- 2 replies
- 881 views
-
- 2 replies
- 405 views
-
- 2 replies
- 403 views
-
- 3 replies
- 407 views
-
- 3 replies
- 624 views
-
- 3 replies
- 972 views
-
- 3 replies
- 506 views
-
- 3 replies
- 279 views
-
- 3 replies
- 776 views
-
- 3 replies
- 811 views
-
- 3 replies
- 903 views
-
- 3 replies
- 861 views
-
- 3 replies
- 815 views
-
- 3 replies
- 803 views
-
- 3 replies
- 399 views
-
- 3 replies
- 335 views
-
- 3 replies
- 795 views
-
- 3 replies
- 774 views
-
- 3 replies
- 431 views
-
- 3 replies
- 889 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 441 views
-
- 3 replies
- 511 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
-
-
-
-
-
The roleplayer's alternative to Stendhal. You can find it live within the Glade-Core.
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
