Denied Applications
38229 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 210 views
-
-
- 3 replies
- 263 views
-
- 2 replies
- 308 views
-
- 2 replies
- 230 views
-
- 3 replies
- 190 views
-
- 3 replies
- 329 views
-
- 3 replies
- 238 views
-
- 4 replies
- 310 views
-
- 3 replies
- 162 views
-
- 3 replies
- 229 views
-
- 2 replies
- 238 views
-
- 2 replies
- 199 views
-
- 3 replies
- 152 views
-
- 2 replies
- 240 views
-
- 2 replies
- 301 views
-
- 2 replies
- 273 views
-
- 3 replies
- 270 views
-
- 3 replies
- 267 views
-
- 2 replies
- 311 views
-
- 3 replies
- 221 views
-
- 3 replies
- 251 views
-
- 2 replies
- 194 views
-
- 3 replies
- 195 views
-
- 2 replies
- 168 views
-
- 2 replies
- 235 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
-
-
-
-
-
The roleplayer's alternative to Stendhal. You can find it live within the Glade-Core.
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
