BonesOfTheEarth

Im sober now but I'll still answer Any time I heard of something broken related to Izkuthii it was the fault of the players playing them, as opposed to the lore itself. Lotc story team has however, ever since flamboyant era continuing into now, been always keen to shoot the magic as opposed to the players who power gamed it That developed such a visceral hatred to it that the rewrite wasn't even properly read and the notes about denial had nothing to do with the piece itself. Izkuthi were basically told the lore would be shot no matter if the new rewrite was made from gods hand and flawless in every way. Basically perception is reality and there was nothing doable to beat its stigma

I recall I left you my collection a while ago and I never came back to recollect despite you pinky promising them back to me It's okay I'll remember to bug you about them some day What is Night Reign? It's the only video game I'm actually good at

A clique? Honestly like 50% of spook rpers are a pretty good clique. Because its not REALLY a clique and is easy to join as an outsider and surprisingly new player friendly. Inferi/Naz rn are my favorite My experience with certain undead players has been solid as well. I didn't join them but they do attempt to pull just about anyone that's cool w/ roleplay into their circle when the roleplay calls for murder, instead of just killing and being done w/ someone; they always like to keep stories going in some way

Ive had a bunch of alcohol tonight and I remember i joined this place like 10 ******* years ago tldr about me: I joined under the name of Fury_Fire I played Lefkos Amethil, who was a lich, then paladin, then wizard, then dead Ask me anything I have no filter

Sheer determination had always won against overwhelming power, but that was nothing more than luck that ran dry, a sweet taste that had made him immortal in his eyes only. On the year 178 of the Second Era, 12th of the Grand Harvest, Lefkos Amethil met his end by the hands of Sol Invicta in the Abyss. A brutal execution, where in his final moments he clawed at the floor like a raving lunatic, defying the notion that he could ever meet his end.

MC Name: BonesOfTheEarth RP Name: Lefkos Persona ID: 12822

On a scale of 1-10, no or yes? Elaborate.

t

o7 good luck soldier

"I'll invite you as my plus one." How was Lefkos there to talk to his mortal enemy? Who knew. It was forums so logic really just falls out the window doesn't it

Translocation keeps getting mad buffs for no reason in the teleportation bit but I'd like the expatriation bit to get some more love instead

My point is that you need to explain that in this piece. Don't say "reference fire evo lore to know the damage of this water evocation spell" - that is incredibly poor planning. Explain the damage of your spell inside of the context of your spell, not by pointing the reader to have to read a different lore piece.

I do not like the first spell, doesnt fit with the lore. I do like the second spell. However: This doesnt make sense. You're comparing 2 unalike things. There is no defined 'charring' effect in fire evocation. Its mention there is as an aesthetic secondary to the degree of burns detailed. Additionally you mention requiring long/constant exposure, something not required to grant the initial burn of blue fire. Overall I think using fire as a comparison for the damage of ice is frankly silly. You should define the damage your dry ice does in the spell instead of making a comparison to an unrelated magic(overall you did straight up copy the idea of blue fire and reword it for ice, which is fine, but you need to bear in mind that differences exist for reasons too. One is water and ice. One is fire. They dont NEED to be the same effect.)

[Amendment]Voidstalking: Living Tether Edit Purpose: Voidstalking is generally viewed as the most powerful of the four ritual-types, with ‘unlimited’ casting stamina to the voidstalkers themselves and the ability to act as mana obelisks while standing still, assisting their allies in cases of threats as well as ritual-uses. The suggested change to Voidstalkers in this amendment is not intended as a direct nerf or buff to the magic however, but instead a small rebalancing. The idea is not to take away from their fantasy of being a spellcasting enigma with powerful magic, but to instead expand on it with a double-edged sword that can be used both by their allies, as well as their enemies. The proposed change is as follows: A Voidstalker acts as a Mana Obelisk while standing still -> A Voidstalker acts as a Mana Obelisk all the time. More plainly, this means that their magic is more readily a boon to their allies without the need for the Voidstalker to stand still, but in turn this can be used against them by opposing spellcasters who manage to enter their range. Original Version: Redlines: - A Voidstalker must be stationary to give the effects listed above. Edited Version: - A Voidstalker always gives the effects listed above.

Is that my BESTIE Amuletic???? Edit: It's been suggested I add a double-parenthesis, spoiler, or OOC notification to the start of this to signify this is OOC. But I firmly believe if you can't tell the difference then you probably need therapy.

"My son copied me!" A grouchy old man exclaims

I'm proud of you But on a real note, for those unaware - the use of this spell on enchantments is already live on the server and has been for a while, through the use of the tier 1 "conjure flame" spell. This basically changes nothing but making it slightly more expensive to cast(a nerf to the spell), while simply clarifying its use for future enchantments. Big +1