frill

where would you say you stand politically

"Let these schismatics be bee-like and die off after their only sting. It is a time where the faith needs to return to being about the faith." Rev. Armas hums in fire-side tedium at the growing political tumult, taking a cheese-knife to his morning fill to encourage it to relieve some crumbs onto the bread placed aside it. "If you seek the merits of a man, pontiff or otherwise, it is very unwise to ask it from his enemies, but not much more foolish to ask them from himself." He continues, thumbing a husk from the bread between his mouth before swilling it with some sweetened red wine.

FR. Pius— If a man doesn't believe in God, he doesn't believe in nothing. As your correspondence should be showing you, the poor beggar can believe in just about anything. To try to imply that a pious man as yourself places value in gold, land and women is to assume that one builds a castle in the sky out of bricks, and one can assume that this atheistic soul's been raising masonry above his head and letting it go to achieve the same end as your years of cloistered prayer. Yours, Vic. H— Armas.

Grow up buddy, your theatre of shifting the blame of poor writing onto the players is not upsetting me. You need to clarify the rules on the main rules post instead of expecting players to delve through pages of explanatory comments when a war does arise. You can't expect to be there at every juncture explaining away inconsistencies if these rules are meant to last. Please, like I asked, put your clarifications in the main rules post. Edit because I'm going to stop replying to you; the intent of what you wrote and what people read from what was written are going to be very different. There is no blame in giving the wording a second or third pass for sake of clarification of meaning. But the comments of an announcement thread are not the place for these revelations. Playing Siege now bye

Spend less time arguing about what the rules should mean and clarify them in the main post. If you're devoting time to writing an explanatory Tolstoy novel blogpost because people are "misinterpreting" what was written, you've shat the bed on writing rules that can easily be understood and followed. Fix that in the main posts.

you can tell which playerbase steered the writing of this

it's like you don't want me to erp at all

he listened......

i hear they just added iron armor to minecraft

I am telesto with long live the queen ornament (with catalyst)

If it is any consolation I've had drinks with a few lotcers irl and I'm still ali

the holy bboon chills me when I think of it and maddens me when I dream of it

*crosses your palm with silver* tell me priceflash

ask me what kind of threads should stop being made

delightful !

do they got forked tongues

@Junar wwho built this

I encourage this brief switching-up of the helm and hope it’s a pivot towards a stronger and more cohesive team. There is a good future ahead, but it is now time to take the first few steps to getting to it.

please factor in replayability if there are like 2 dungeons. puzzles et al would be very slog boring encounters if you’ve already done them before so know the answers.

legal scholar albrecht eggebrecht writes a letter to leonard van halen concerning a tangential bill rider dear sir i write to you over my morning brew now that a temporal limitation is introduced to imperial law, why is there no geographic one? should a man break an existing law in a realm that is later imperial territory, does he suffer criminal liability through the infinite regress of time (not that time regresses infinitely, for we do know it was Created – but let us not bog down in canonical eisegesis! we have law to lawyer!), or are there geographic limitations to the punitive power of the state? if i were to kill a fellow man in wildylands uncharted nor claimed until decades later, it would be murder, but would i be hot-footed to the prison wagon and gifted six foot of an “orener’s necktie” should these lands later become imperial territory? after all, it would be a crime committed on imperial soil, but soil that had yet to be imperial soil at the time. your kindly orc states that its purpose is for “the dispensation of justice within our realm”, but to what temporal degree? is it within the imperial realm-in-space or imperial realm-in-moment? i demand and implore for geographical limitations to be explicated if someone as wizened as myself is confused, i can only imagine your top academics are banging their heads against their tables in frustration i hope this letter finds you in good health and i send you a bouquet attached and a million sympathies on hearing of your brother edwards recent passing from this realm to his eternal reward, yours, albrecht eggebrecht