Jump to content

[Your View] Transition to 6.0


Wrynn

Transition Solution  

348 members have voted

  1. 1. Solution A

    • Yes
      129
    • No
      219
  2. 2. Solution B

    • Yes
      96
    • No
      252
  3. 3. Solution C

    • Yes
      239
    • No
      109
  4. 4. Solution D

    • Yes
      119
    • No
      229


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ElrithSearith said:

Solution A, but we give groups like Sutica, Savinia, and the Snow Elves free LC and World Edit for 1 month so they can build new cities on the Tahn map!

1
 

A month would be too long. Like with active builders you;d get it done in a week or two max with those tools.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Solution A, do it. Come on, don't ***** out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Elfen Lie said:

A month would be too long. Like with active builders you;d get it done in a week or two max with those tools.

 

Just a suggestion. Of course, it would be much shorter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

>9 people said "yes" to option D 

 

spotted the slow ones 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm more interested in the actual lore behind us leaving, Id much rather not witness another alaskan bullworm or these proto-elves. Being pushed to the next map by some force against us has always been and thing and it has never been well received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Wrynn, supposing we go with Solution A, can we get a list of reasons a charter can be revoked for? And will charters being revoked result in some form of compensation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

>choosing options C or D at all 

 

jesus ******* christ guys are you serious right now

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the D option. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's two active settlements on Asul. Veris and Savinia. What will happen to them? Veris for one is almost done with an activity check which we are to my knowledge passing. Will Veris be given free LC upon the mandatory move to Tahn? Can a moderator or staff team member get with me privately? Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ski_king3 said:

Two of the only active RP hubs on the server are on Ceru and Asul, it would be a bit bizarre to force them to up and move...

0
 

 

^

Can't believe I'm quoting Ski after everything.

 

I get that you're wanting to shrink the current map while we wait for 6.0 but this will only ruin the actually active cities on these two islands.

 

Mess Tahn up, remove inactive nations that have existed since VAILOR and have been protected by OOC nonsense, stop giving out charters and let nations give out land to these people instead, cause natural disasters on unused tiles.

 

Uprooting current RP hubs through OOC methods is only going to destroy those that worked to build and maintain RPly while we move and have to rebuild everything. It favors those settlements that aren't being affected OOCly. I'd rather have all 3 Isles undergo some Pangea **** and everyone have to deal with the backlash.

 

 

PS: Am I getting compensation for the 200k+ I had to give to Ever and other Admins to buy all these tiles I'm losing?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Evocress said:

I like the D option. 

0
 

 

483cd8b8e43890267c1230d8756526ff.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Pink Lion said:

@Wrynn, supposing we go with Solution A, can we get a list of reasons a charter can be revoked for? And will charters being revoked result in some form of compensation?

0
 

As it stands we don't really have a list of who's charter will be getting removed and who's wont, however if it turns out that Solution A is the majority vote - I'll make sure a post is released before hand explaining the solution a bit more c:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything except solution A. Solution A completely fucks over a large portion of players from places like Suitca, Veris, and of course other charters and settlements while anyone on Tahn gets to just relax and laugh. Why should the two most active islands have to completely move? Don't punish those players just because staff made a messed up map. Either keep us on Axios until the new map is ready or toss everyone on a temp map so everyone's on equal footing with starting over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I vote for option C. Option A would be good and all, however that removes cities that people live in, as well. I live in Veris, as do many other people, for instance. There's a lot of RP that happens there daily. I can't voice for the other cities, though, as I havn't had any interaction with them yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SquirtGun said:

 

^

Can't believe I'm quoting Ski after everything.

 

I get that you're wanting to shrink the current map while we wait for 6.0 but this will only ruin the actually active cities on these two islands.

 

Mess Tahn up, remove inactive nations that have existed since VAILOR and have been protected by OOC nonsense, stop giving out charters and let nations give out land to these people instead, cause natural disasters on unused tiles.

 

Uprooting current RP hubs through OOC methods is only going to destroy those that worked to build and maintain RPly while we move and have to rebuild everything. It favors those settlements that aren't being affected OOCly. I'd rather have all 3 Isles undergo some Pangea **** and everyone have to deal with the backlash.

 

 

PS: Am I getting compensation for the 200k+ I had to give to Ever and other Admins to buy all these tiles I'm losing?

 

 

4
 

 

I second this. Option A is most certainly not the way to go. I think just remaining in Axios until the next map is ready, or perhaps have all the isles form one large continent might be the better way to go about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...