Inactive Character
1292 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 745 views
-
-
- 0 replies
- 860 views
-
- 0 replies
- 698 views
-
- 0 replies
- 856 views
-
- 0 replies
- 708 views
-
- 0 replies
- 666 views
-
- 0 replies
- 898 views
-
- 0 replies
- 696 views
-
- 0 replies
- 630 views
-
- 0 replies
- 613 views
-
- 0 replies
- 734 views
-
- 0 replies
- 596 views
-
- 1 reply
- 673 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 993 views
-
- 0 replies
- 709 views
-
- 0 replies
- 941 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 746 views
-
- 0 replies
- 807 views
-
- 1 reply
- 736 views
-
- 0 replies
- 807 views
-
- 0 replies
- 766 views
-
- 0 replies
- 999 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
