New Rule Additions

[Harri 4815]

Hello friends,

 

Throughout the whole blacklist ordeal, the GM team have been trying to work as best as they can to do something over the down time - namely fixing and adding rules in. We've got three changes to present forth:

 

Changes and additions to rules regarding casus belli and raiding:

• If two or more factions halt a war and subsequent aggression via the signing of a treaty, white peace and/or pact, both sides thereby forfeit any previously established or usable Casus Belli for a future conflict. As a result of such a rule, any future war-claim conducted by either side must utilize a fresh Casus Belli in correspondence with current WC rules.
• If a faction is raided and repels the raiders via annihilation of the enemy, the aggressor would not be able to utilize this as Casus Belli for a conquest. If a faction is raided and repels the raiders via annihilation and obtains solid proof of the enemy's identity, the defender would be permitted Casus Belli to warrant a pillage warclaim (after the required skirmishes etc).

               

Clarification and confirmation on character ownership:

• Should a character be involved somehow IRP and made canon, and a player has been assigned that character to play, it is then their property and they have complete control over it. 

                         

Changes to rules about multiple accounts:

• Players may be on multiple accounts at once but the rules surrounding multi-boxing still apply (you may not have two of your own characters interact with each other). If you are found interacting between your two accounts, you shall face a punishment.

 

These changes shall be added to the rule page soon enough.

[Lefty 1696]

So let's say the Dwarves where to like genocide the Orcs, we win the war and force them to surrender. In like a months time after that, the Orcs can't use the fact that we genocided them as a reason to go to war with us? 

[Guest Guest]

I have a network of 38 Mc accounts to run my business, what am I supposed to do now??

[Raomir 1855]

can we get the old raid rules were there were no raid timers? thanks

[Suika 111]

What counts as solid proof, and who counts as an enemy? What if the enemy was acting against his own faction's wishes?

2 hours ago, HB_ said:

If a faction is raided and repels the raiders via annihilation and obtains solid proof of the enemy's identity, the defender would be permitted Casus Belli to warrant a pillage warclaim (after the required skirmishes etc).

 

 

[Harri 4815]

29 minutes ago, Raomir said:

can we get the old raid rules were there were no raid timers? thanks

considering it tbh

27 minutes ago, Suika said:

What counts as solid proof, and who counts as an enemy? What if the enemy was acting against his own faction's wishes?

 

Solid proof would be things like uniforms. And well, it's quite obvious who the enemy would be - you wouldn't be raiding/getting raided by your allies. Finally, if that's the case, then I'm sure a faction would be able to handle that in role-play and clear up confusions through meetings.

[KeatonUnbeaten 1103]

NO RAID TIMERS OR NO RAID LIMITS

#NRToNRL

[Hackhen 68]

this sever makes it so difficult to start a empire plus theses rules are just trying to save the westarlands plus heanse

[Malgonious 2758]

Down with Raid Timers, Raid Cap Increases!

[Narthok 10416]

remove raid caps and just have no cap raids once a week between warring factions, leave caps on lawless raids. Human factions are the ones that will be warring anyways and they're the ones that want no cap raids might as well do this as a compromise so domestic rp heavy groups like the halflings don't get fucked by bandits looking for some easy pvp

[HedgeHug 2049]

5 hours ago, HB_ said:

Players may be on multiple accounts at once but the rules surrounding multi-boxing still apply (you may not have two of your own characters interact with each other). If you are found interacting between your two accounts, you shall face a punishment.

hah time to do five rp's at the same time

[Andustar 4143]

1 hour ago, Redrat77 said:

this sever makes it so difficult to start a empire plus theses rules are just trying to save the westarlands plus heanse

Grr, Haense. Grr, Westerlands. Grr, Oren.

[Destroyer_Bravo 1054]

what about temp ceasefires of [duration] length time

[Taketheshot 3834]

24 minutes ago, Ended said:

Grr, Haense. Grr, Westerlands. Grr, Oren.

                          Deep inside the Westerlands King Leopold kneels before an ornate table.

 "Forgive me. I feel it again... The pull to the Balkanization... Supreme Leader Maly senses it. Show me again... The power of the Imperium... And I'll let nothing stand in our way... Show me... Grandfather... and I will finish... what you started."

[Nathan_Barnett36 1564]

2 hours ago, Redrat77 said:

this sever makes it so difficult to start a empire plus theses rules are just trying to save the westarlands plus heanse

I mean, you don't really have a casus belli anymore. You gave us a chance to drop out of the war or there would be war and we dropped out. So, what is your casus belli this time other then "they wronged us in the past".