Royal Court
22 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
- 0 replies
- 305 views
-
Other topics
-
-
- 1 reply
- 282 views
-
- 5 replies
- 777 views
-
- 0 replies
- 235 views
-
- 17 replies
- 922 views
-
- 1 reply
- 611 views
-
- 0 replies
- 247 views
-
- 2 replies
- 337 views
-
- 9 replies
- 537 views
-
- 3 replies
- 373 views
-
- 0 replies
- 242 views
-
- 3 replies
- 695 views
-
- 0 replies
- 347 views
-
- 2 replies
- 326 views
-
- 7 replies
- 599 views
-
- 0 replies
- 470 views
-
- 0 replies
- 342 views
-
- 3 replies
- 337 views
-
- 6 replies
- 547 views
-
- 1 reply
- 510 views
-
- 6 replies
- 624 views
-
- 2 replies
- 332 views
.thumb.png.352eb4102ab2400157bbaaadb1645189.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
