FlemishSupremacy
-
Posts
931 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Status Updates posted by FlemishSupremacy
-
Whatever admin is holding back the warrules...
Badmin.
-
Can we finally get some clarity on whether or not GMs are in the right to complain about copy paste emotes to engage in banditry?
- Show previous comments 3 more
-
The main consistent issue we have is copy pasting of literally the exact same emote three times or whatever they need to do to meet a requirement for ‘sufficient roleplay’. We want banditry RP to create interesting interactions and “add value” to a players roleplay experience. Adding value doesn’t necessarily mean that the player will leave that situation glad they got robbed of course, but creating an environment where this banditry impacted their character in some way or lead to more roleplay interaction with the group or individual is good. So while there shouldn’t be anything wrong with a player having saved emotes, we want those emotes to be both engaging and realistic both in what they are trying to accomplish, while also leaving room for the player being engaged upon to respond in some way, this means not spamming all emotes at once but giving time for an interaction to occur if that makes sense.
-
That is a very reasonable and completely acceptable response, however, it seems to not be what all of your colleagues follow, which is my issue. Please make some solid rules about it, so we don’t get confusion. @Anore
Markosi, for one (not trying to call him out or criticize him here, just to give an example) said that we shouldn’t have done halting emotes in our first emote, and that it should just be an attention grabbing emote, however, in the rules page:
the emote linked under the ‘here’ is quite literally a halting emote: https://imgur.com/U1l5scX
I’d just like to see a clear rule, so that there’s no more confusion about it, because staff have gone from “not allowed” to “allowed” to “allowed in some cases” and back multiple times, and there’s no way of knowing what is acceptable when.
-
-
https://files.lordofthecraft.net/maps/ you might be able to find Vailor in here, not sure if it’s the version with al-wakrah
-
I wish we could keep 10% of our minas on map change...
-
Staff should do more your views before doing rule rewrites...
-
Unban Callum, NOW!
-
-
Some lore needs a serious nerf
-
can we remove half-races already?
-
Honestly, if the rules are so restrictive that **** like Elite’s situation, in which no one got hurt get him banned, then change the rules.
Fun not allowed on LoTC?
-
Ribbit.
-
Haenser be like:
-
Ban reporting someone over being banned from a discord, jesus christ
-
I've said it numerous times; haense pretends to be a cute rper community until something they dont like occurs, at which point they turn rabid and instantly show the worst sides of themselves. We see it now against Axelu and we saw it very clearly when Sambech and his group left to do their own cute little French thing.
For those who need a reminder of what happened then: Haensemen first made memey englishmen characters to raid Sambech's charter (blatant ooctargetting), and then they made a petty document in which they basically talked **** about Sambech and his group, leaked someones vulnerable IRL and medical situation and just generally tried to coerce sambechs group into abandonning the project they were looking forward to.
- Show previous comments 8 more
-
-
-
@Narthok “Sorry, you cannot add any more reactions today.” ok
-
Bring back the FM team. GMs are barely capable of answering modreqs so get additional folks to patrol the forums.
- Show previous comments 2 more
-
-
I put forward sectioning permissions in moderation and bringing on people from staff into forum moderation as an additional duty. Would eventually open it up to public applications when policy and such was ironed out because it had been neglected... Still using the old FM stuff, branding and all...
Telanir, Tarre, and Flam all voted no (found out before the admin votes were finished) to it despite the entire moderation team at the time being in agreement in being in favour of it.
Makes me cry
-
-
I somewhat understand the decision to make BR’s private, but atleast let everyone that’s involved see what’s going on, because with screenshots, it’s extremely easy to frame something to be in your favour.
-
This. Surely it’s possible to make sure the people involed in the BR get the ability to see it? It does not need to become a rep farm for the entire server to laugh at but giving multiple parties a chance to provide their input while directly speaking to eachother rather than forwarding their evidence to a GM should be possible.
-
-
-
