On Orenism: A Synopsis of Pro-Empire Arguments

[yopplwasupxxx 5665]

“Some years back, I wrote a brief essay regarding my opinions on the “A.D.D.F.A.”, detailing the perceived hypocrisy of the declaration and its dealings with the political theory of anti-Imperialism. I mentioned only briefly arguments made both for and against the establishment of a singular human state, commonly called and henceforth referred to as “Oren.” It is prudent to enter into more detail regarding this debate. In the text herein, I shall expound what I have found to be the most prevalent cases made on the side of the pro-Imperialists. A later work shall engage with the ideas of post-Orenism, or the ideology that rejects the concept of Oren in whole or in part.

 

In summary, Orenism is the belief that the human races should be united into a singular polity. The form of government that this state takes can range from an autonomous confederation with significant freedoms to imperial subdivisions, to a federative monarchy of balanced powers between crown and province, and lastly to a unitary state with a highly centralized bureaucracy. Traditionally, it is led by a singular monarch who passes the throne to their eldest child through primogeniture succession, although a brief era of elective monarchy occurred during the reigns of Emperor Tobias and Emperor Alexander I. The monarch of Oren was historically styled as “King of Oren'' since the first reunification by Daniel of Al Khazar, but since the reign of Emperor Godfrey I the honor of “Holy Orenian Emperor” (and to a lesser extent, “Emperor of Man”) has been vastly preferred by titleholders in early modern history.

 

Throughout the historiography of Oren, numerous appeals have been made towards the legitimacy of a united human polity. Many of these are interrelated and commonly the regime at the time will use a mixture of most if not all to justify their reign. I have boiled these down to five primary theories. Other perspectives and reasonings exist, both historically and contemporaneously. This therefore is not an exhaustive list, but those I consider the most commonly used both past and present.

 

---

 

Mandation Theory (Rule by Divine Right)

 

“[T]he Emperor is bestowed a dignity beyond all honors, for it is a dignity bestowed by God [. . .] By the nature of his body,  the Emperor is alike to other men--but by his authority, he is above all others, and no man can claim greater jurisdiction. The Imperial Office is that of the Lord’s viceregent in this world [. . .]”

-Prince-Father Charles Polycarp, archbishop and father of Emperor John I[1]

 

The claim of receiving divine right to rule is an primordial concept. Origins of rulers receiving the guarantee of rulership from God can be found in the Canon Scrolls, specifically in the anointing of the four prophets. All of these sanctioned hierophants held temporal powers by virtue of holding domain over kingdoms and empires, from which their legitimacy to rule against would-be rivals stemmed from a divinely-ordained mandate. Nearly all contemporary monarchs today claim celestial legitimacy to rule in one way or another. While modern nations may include rites such as swearing oaths to defend the rights of the people or other legalist pomp, the coronation of the monarch and the baptism of their head in holy water remains the most crucial part of their enthronement. 

 

Oren is no exception to this phenomenon. Important to note that still within Canon Law, the Holy Orenian Emperor can only be crowned and enthroned by the sole discretion of the High Pontiff. No other royal pedigree in humanity bears this rigorous stipulation. A question therefore arises: while all kingdoms and fiefs maintain their dignities through a perceived divine right, what separates them from the higher role of ruler of Oren?

 

Humanity has maintained an ideology that, due to their descent from the only faithful brother of the Four Descendants, that there is a divine blessing upon the race as a whole. Since atleast the time of Emperor Godfrey I and perhaps even earlier to the reign of Daniel of Al Khazar, this transcendent mission came unified with an idea that this objective is best achieved through a unified Oren. As written by Albanus Cuptor,

 

“Horen’s kind, also known as Humanity is by divine right instructed to spread the word of the Canon to the other descendant races, because they have found other idols of worship, this is true even today. It was because of Horen’s steadfast faith that this is so. This is why and how Humankind is believed to be the chosen race. It wasn’t until Exalted Godfrey Horen, that Human unification became a major Human ideal. He united Seventis, Salvus, Hanseti and Renatus, offering all Human states a choice, vassalize under him peacefully or be conquered.”

-Albanus Cuptor, Canonist priest and member of the Cult of Owyn[2]

 

Oren therefore became a religious ideal. The Emperor is vested in an office of sacred grandeur, tasked with keeping the ethnicities and tribes of mankind together. Unity of the human tribes best fulfilled the mission of proselytization, promulgation, and defense of the Canonist faith. Pictures of this belief can be found in scripture. Throughout the Canon Scrolls, jubilation is given when humanity is united; likewise, pain and suffering is seen when this state is divided apart. A powerful delineation of this can be found in High Pontiff James II’s missive regarding the secession of the Kingdom of Haense under Emperor Joseph II,

 

“Nevertheless, here is still a division of the Sons of Horen, and so we should also weep with our celebrations. Each of the Exalted fought to ensure humanity was united--in the scripture, when the kingdoms of man are divided from their brothers, it is treated as an exceedingly tragic thing. ‘So the Kingdom of Oren, the patrimony of Horen’s people, was shattered across the world.’ (Godfrey 6:4) And each time they are united under God, that is a cause for celebration. ‘Thus mankind was united in virtue, in the highlands and the heartlands, and in the farthest homes of the sons of Horen.’ (Godfrey 6:33)”

-High Pontiff James II[3]

 

A common archetype in justifying Oren as divinely ordained rests in the mystical saying, “As above, so below; as below, so above.” The Seven Skies are ruled by a singular God, yet divided into multiple sections of the valiant dead and faithful aenguls, each with their own traits, quirks, and virtues. Much like the one God rules the heavenly multitude, so too does an Emperor rule the vast diverse masses of man, regardless of cultural ties and separations. As Polycarp wrote, “[t]he Imperial Office is the Lord’s viceregent in this world” and it is a logical conclusion from this that the Emperor, in a way, acts as God does in maintaining distinct branches into an exclusive whole.

 

Yet there is a difference between Oren being a divinely ordained state to unify humanity and a singular Emperor being divinely ordained to lead this unified humanity. Although we can argue that Oren is spiritually mandated from above, how does one know the leader of such a polity is the chosen “viceregent” as expounded by Polycarp? A quite extreme answer can be found in the highly criticized writings of High Pontiff Daniel III, scribed shortly before his death,

 

“The blood of the Prophets ran thick with GOD's heavenly mandate. Many Emperors and Kings have reigned over the realms of men, but only the divine blood of the Prophets wields the right to rule over mankind. The blood of Owyn, Horen, Godfrey and Sigismund runs through the veins of the Imperial Household, and the Emperor. While the High Pontiff is selected by right of the previous Pontiff's divine right, the Emperor of Mankind is selected by the divine right of exalted blood. The Holy Orenian Emperor always must be the blood of the Prophets, and of all the men in the world, only the House of Horen wields all of the Prophet's blood.”

-High Pontiff Daniel III[4]

 

For High Pontiff Daniel III, it is blood descent from the prophets which guarantees that the ruler in question is divinely ordained as the rightful princeps hujus mundi. However, despite this argument being popular during the early days of Emperors Godfrey I and Sigismund, this answer was rejected both during Daniel III’s time and after. A serious blow in this idea came in the civil wars between Horen princes stretching from the fall of the Johannian dynasty by death of John VI and the War of Two Emperors which pitted branches of the Hominids against each other. In a world where now countless noble clans claim direct patrilineal descent from prophets, which then are the lawful designees of God’s mandate?

 

An important critique of bloodright as the sole indication of divine right came in the stories of Harren and his conflict with his nephew Owyn. Despite Harren being the eldest son of Prophet Horen, God seemingly turns away from him due to the former’s excesses and rejection of the laurels of prophethood. Divine right, despite any claim of lineal inheritance, can be taken away. This nuanced position can be best elucidated in the writings of Brandt Barclay,

 

“In my view, the idea of divine right can be traced back to a binding contract between the ruler and the people they govern. This contract involves a sacred pact between the two parties [. . .] The idea of divine right thus originates from such a pact. Instead of being tied solely to inheritance or election, divine right is a conferred mandate of God that is assumed through just governance. This means that a ruler must govern with justice and fairness, protecting the rights of the citizens, and ensuring their safety and well-being. In return, the citizens give their consent to be governed, and the ruler is entrusted with the responsibility of upholding the pact, thus earning their title of 'Dei Gratia'.”

-Brandt Barclay, courtier and vassal prince of King James of Aaun[5]

 

A ruler who maintains mandate to exert power and authority, for Barclay, comes from an innate pact between the governor and the governed (this is quite similar to Populist Theory, see below). However, whether just governance leads to the being protected by divine right or if divine right emanates justice in rulership is a question of debate. Despite this, the righteous monarch being seen as Polycarp’s “viceregent” remains perhaps the most popular stance of this philosophy. A ruler perceived as unjust is dismissed as lacking any higher mandate, and throughout the numerous civil wars that have raged in the lands of Oren, sinful indulgence becomes a common critique to lay at enemies and rivals for the throne.

 

A note on the history of the relationship between Emperor, Oren, and the religious establishment should be detailed. Historically speaking, the institution of the Emperor maintained a status of spiritual authority which supersedes kings and, at times, the High Pontiff. For example, the Hansetian king Mark referred to Emperor Godfrey I as a “God-Emperor” during his lifetime, and indeed Godfrey held vast authoritative control over the nascent church during his reign. The head of the Canonist Church during the time of Emperor Sigismund, Radomar (himself a son of Sigismund and later King of Oren in his own right as Francis), declared the Carrion monarch divine as well in papal bull. A more modern movement occurred through the controversial visions of High Pontiff Daniel III (another imperial prince as son of Emperor John I), although these were later rescinded by successor pontiffs and Daniel was deposed from the holy see. Clamoring became apparent during the time of Emperor Aurelian that laity and lower clergy intended to declare him divine, so much so that High Pontiff Sigismund was forced to make public condemnation of the movement.

 

The institution of the Church has commonly played a role as agents of the Orenian state. The religious establishment was effectively under implicit state control under Emperor Godfrey I and his immediate successors, an inheritance from the previous Kingdom of Oren established by Godfrey’s grandfather Daniel of Alkhazar. The controversial High Pontiff Owyn I gave his inheritance to the future Emperor Sigismund, laying the foundation for the rise of the Carrion dynasty to imperial dignity. The Chivay regime of Emperors Peter I and Robert I, much like their predecessors Emperors Godfrey I and Orian, placed the Church as effective vassals to the Imperial Crown. The faith-condoned Canonist League laid the groundwork for Andrik Vydra to declare himself king of a reestablished Oren. Members of the high clergy orchestrated the assassination of Guy de Bar which directly led to the ascension of Emperor John I. It was by direct intervention of High Pontiff Daniel VI that raised both Emperors Alexander II and Peter III to their station after the destructive War of Two Emperors ended. Additionally, Imperial state actors supported the Church’s condemnation of the Lendian rite in Haense, indirectly using the hysteria to stamp out dissent against the Empire under Emperors Peter III and Joseph II.

 

In some cases, the exchange between Oren and faith have been downright hostile. Most famously, High Pontiff Regulus and soldiers of the Order of Saint Lucien orchestrated a coup d’etat against Francis of Oren (referred to today as the Franciscan Massacre), eventually leading to the installation of Emperor Peter I on the throne. The erstwhile High Pontiff Sixtus III has been suspected to have been murdered under orders of Guy de Bar for his tacit support of rebels in the Dukes’ War. Emperor John III deposed High Pontiff Theodosius for agitation against the state. When claims of Emperor Aurelian’s divinity emerged, High Pontiff Sigismund spoke in heavy criticism, also leading to his dismissal from office. A united conspiracy between Oren and Haense overthrew the unpopular High Pontiff Owyn III. In recent memory, High Pontiff Everard VI excommunicated Emperor Philip III, leading to a decade-long war and the eventual downfall of the Novellen dynasty.

 

Despite this, Emperors have vied for religious legitimacy. The validity of the reigns of Emperors Godfrey I and Sigismund came from their reestablishment of the Church of the Canon after periods of turmoil. When High Pontiff Regulus rejected the petition from Francis to coronate him, Francis raised up his own pontiff in order to validate his rule. The ascension of Emperor Peter I and the Chivay dynasty came about with promises to clean the corruption of the current church. Likewise, Andrew Vydra only received immense support for his declaration of himself as king after leadership of the Canonist League in the Schism War. When Guy de Bar was assassinated, one of the first actions Emperor John I did was seek a coronation from High Pontiff Daniel II. It was the initial refusal of High Pontiffs Clement III and Everard IV which delayed Emperor Aurelian’s attempts to enthrone himself in the Imperial office. Lastly, at the onset of the War of Two Emperors, the first actions done by claimants Joseph I and Godfrey II was to be crowned by their respective partisan pontiffs.

 

As seen, the relationship between secular and religious institutions within Oren waxes and wanes, typically spurred by political trends at the time. However, the status of the monarch of Oren retained an extraordinary clerical power unheard of now in modern temporal leadership. The numinous nature of the Imperial office was something heralded to frequently and used both in creating legitimacy and exercising real, authoritative power. Even today, an ethereal virtue of imperium remains prolific in the modern imagination.

 

---

 

Naturalist Theory (Tapestry of Man)

 

“The tapestry of man is a unity. It is one whole, made of composite parts. This aged piece of cloth, centuries old, shows itself in whole against its pessimistic critics. It teaches us of the falsehood of those vipers who would declaim the profound unity at the core of mankind, and the Empire which it has forged through time.”

-Emperor Joseph II[6]

 

The view that Oren is the natural, most pure form of humanity is not a new concept. In fact, one may see a naturalist view on Oren as a secular outgrowth of the previously detailed Mandation Theory. However, instead of the religious mandate of the former, many statesmen have harkened instead to a national patriotism, one in which sees Oren as the purest form of nationalist tendencies made manifest. Instead of relying on faith alone, common culture and heritage is made paramount to the validity of a human polity. The vitality of national pride can be found in the works of Edward Winter, who saw it as crucial towards the stability and health of any state,

 

“The success of righteous human nations can be traced back to a single unifying principle: national pride. This can usually be identified in an environment in which it arises in response to a common enemy, and in which culture is encouraged.”

-Edward Winter, Imperial statesman and vassal prince to five Emperors[7]

 

Common in appealing to the nationalist pride of Oren is the importance placed among the disparate cultures and individual men of the state. Numerous estates ranging from soldiers, merchants, and farmers are presented as citizens par excellence. Duty to one’s occupation is loyalty to the state. Oren in this regard is frequently equated to a physical body: each organ or part plays an intrinsic role in maintaining the whole. A quote from Augustus Montfort sums this up clearly,

 

“When the tides of heathens crash against the gray-stone bulwarks and red-clay, it is the merchant, the farmer, the noble’s son, and the priest’s brother, not the mercenary’s vicious blade, who bloody their arms in the gore of the enemy. It is the Adrian citizen-soldier, the Savoyard orderman, the Akovian veteran who stand on the battlements, not a stout paragon forgotten by time. The citizens of Oren are pious, noble, and loyal, and it is from their ceaseless spirit and bravery that I source my patriotism. It is from their courageous heart and faithful soul that our nation takes its exceptional character. It is because of the people of Oren that our kingdom, our country, will always remain great.”

-Augustus Montfort, a follower of Andrik Vydra and later supporter of Hughes de Sarkozy[8]

 

Engaging in these arguments attempts to not only show unity amongst ethnic differences, but also tries to show that these differences are simply parts of a greater identity. This binding identity which all humans share is a natural urge which can be found in all of mankind. Evoking this instinct is crucial to all projects which aim to establish and maintain an Orenian government. Generally, this is done in the presence of a foreign enemy or rebellious agitation against the current regime. An example of this can be found during the latter days of the Savoyard dynasty when dealing with the pother of the Dukes’ War and Hughes de Sarkozy’s fail claim to the throne,

 

“[Patriotism] is the foundation of the Common Man’s disposition. A fire burns bright within his heart and so he fulfills his role for Oren, and needs no further inspiration from coin. [. . .] This fundamental patriotism, however, describes not only the warrior that risks his life on the field of battle, but also the man that toils in the field or in the mill for his liege lord. Where would our noble nation be without the men that make up our backbone?- providing food, armor, weapons, and materials in the name of progress and Orenic industry.”

-Matthias de Lyon, courtier and agent of Guy de Bar and the Savoyard dynasty[9]

 

As seen above, fervor for bellicose loyalty to Oren has been since the very early days of the national institution. Yet this philosophy did not reach maturity until the rise of the Novellen dynasty, which was perhaps the first real Imperial regime to face ethnic agitation on a large scale. The most potent snippet of this idea is found deriving from the aforementioned Armas: “To be human is to be an Orenian.” He further writes,

 

“No student of history can finish his letters without becoming such, because when humanity is united and working towards a shared goal, anything is possible. The only circumstance in which this can be done is through a central, governing authority that both charters the rights of its subjects while also requiring them to, in part, defer their own interests to that of the collective and the whole. This is the purpose of Oren - a collaboration to achieve greatness.”

-Frederick Armas, Imperial statesman and tutor to Emperor Joseph II[10]

 

In the advent of ethnic nationalism, carried throughout the provincial reaches of the Empire (it’s most famous exemplar being the Kingdom of Haense), Imperial philosophers and political theorists turned to fully fleshing out an argument that Oren, very much from being an artificial concept, was in fact the most natural and pure state of mankind. For them, to be faithfully human was to be a supporter of Oren. The ancient status of this inheritance was highlighted in many of the writings of the day. For example, in Simon Basrid’s resignation speech he gave upon leaving the office of Archchancellor, he specifically mentioned,

 

“Our Oren is unique among all realms as the living legacy of the Exalted Horen, a land of prophets, the keeper of all man’s apostolic traditions. Each of us are custodians to the great Tapestry of Man, gifted to us by our ancestors, passed onto our children, that serves as the chronicle of being. So long as every fellow is committed to protecting this state, so will our histories, culture, and way of life endure.”

-Simon Basrid, Imperial statesman who served as Archchancellor to Emperor Peter III[11]

 

Like when a father passes the mantle of his estate to his son, so too is Oren a gift passed down from generation to generation. It is natural for a son to maintain and perhaps even garner further gains in what he inherits; does this tract of thinking not then also follow with Oren? This Tapestry of Man has been woven since the days of creation, and it is the responsibility of every thread within it to keep its vibrancy and allure.. Those who come loose from the bindings are, as Emperor Joseph II put, simply “vipers.”

 

If the argument is accepted that humanity by nature of its common blood is to be united, how does this unity maintain itself in effective praxis? More specifically, what structure of governance should Oren retain? Oren as a monarchy has always been the dominant answer, yet opinions vary on the power of the Imperial office and its varying vassals, princes, and institutions. In the days of Emperor Godfrey I, Oren existed as a de facto confederation of numerous sub-states and autonomous regions. Each province retained its own militaries, knightly orders, and structures of internal governance. Fast forward to the time of the last Imperial dynasty, the Novellens, and Oren has become a highly centralized bureaucratic state, where military and public policy is solely exercised by a unitary power. This is not to mention the existence of democratic institutions such as the Imperial Diet, which operated in varying capacities from Emperor Aurelian to the final days of Emperor Philip III.

 

An Emperor absolute in power has led to numerous rebellions, such as the provincial uprisings coordinated by claimant Emperor Joseph I against Emperor Anthony after the latter razed the city of Ves or the Dukes’ War of Hughes de Sarkozy who raised the banner of dissent when Olivier de Savioe refused to punish his courtiers. Unitary currents in Imperial governance is also what drove the Kingdom of Haense to secession during the reign of Emperor Joseph II. Yet an Imperial office which does not project real power also has fallen prey to hardship. Emperor William could not wrangle his own princes to remain loyal, and much of the Anarchy under Emperor John II were discontented landowners that carried the ability to amass powerful levies and hire mercenary armies. Ultimately, however, the question of the structure of Oren’s government is outside the purview of this essay. 

 

Another question presented is what separates Emperor Joseph II’s “vipers” from those justified in disobedience against the current ruling government. The Novellen regime under Joseph II rested on many of the arguments and supporters of Emperor Joseph I’s failed bid to the Imperial office, done through a bloody and destructive civil war. The arbitrary tyranny of Emperor Anthony was taken for granted, and it was seemingly apparent that this despotism must be overthrown. Years later, a similar rebellion broke out in Sedan, with many middling landowners citing remarkably parallel critiques that were given by the Marnantine faction in the War of Two Emperors. This uprising, however, was crushed and dismantled by Emperor Joseph II through military means. Is this simply a pragmatic approach: that judgment of the ruling caste is only legitimate when one is not in power or stakes their claim from said criticism? Or is there a deeper philosophical definition which can limn a statutory category for just and unjust rebellion? One could say the tyrannical reaches of the Novellens were far surpassed by Emperor Anthony and his predecessor Pertinaxi, but this would be a broad stroke of history. The Burning of Ves was a tragedy for the ages, but did it truly supersede moments in history such as Emperor Godfrey I’s pillaging of Malinor, the forceful expulsion and destruction of the nobility under Emperor Sigismund, or the chain of assassinations by agents of Emperor John I to cement his control of the nascent Empire?

 

Lastly, I also wish to end on the note of whether Oren is truly legitimate if it controls all of the lands of humanity or if a state of Oren can validly exist when independent realms of mankind exist outside its explicit and implicit control. Much of the drama during the reign of Emperor Tobias consisted of his attempts to bring the Hansetian princes, led by the Rovin family, back into the fold of his Empire, to which he succeeded albeit only for a short time. Later in history, heavy critique and blame was placed on the shoulders of Emperor John V who failed to subdue rebellions in the south, which exacerbated plots against him by powerful landowners and vassals. Perhaps the most famous example in the contemporary mind is the secession of Haense from the Novellen-ruled Empire, which again placed heavy burden on the legitimacy of their rule as Emperors. This is also not to mention, of course, the constant existence of non-Canonist human polities which continuously exist outside the purview of Imperial control, such as the distant northern clans of Orvar and Rurikid or the Rashidun followers of the Qali (although these groups have at times been under Imperial vassalage, such as the case under Emperors John I, Aurelian, and Alexander II).

 

If human nations exist outside of Oren, is Oren as a “nation of humanity” henceforth illegitimate? And if Oren can co-exist with these independent polities, is then Oren truly a “nation of humanity”? If it is simply a title used by rulers that does not perform any extraordinary purposes, such as the arguments found in the Tapestry of Man tradition, then the aforementioned idea begins to fall apart. Realistic and pragmatic expectations do have to be taken into account, however. Fortunes rise and fall through time, and perhaps a handful of rebellious polities does not negate the intention for a state which calls itself Oren to one day bring them back into the safety of their bosom: whether through diplomacy or by force. Even with these considerations taken into account, this is a question that has bore little answer from the writings of philosophers and thinkers.

 

Regardless, the Tapestry of Man remains a common hallmark of political writing into the present day. States such as Haense, Aaun, and Balian continuously reference it in their edicts, decrees, and other works made by citizens of their nations. The greatest feat of the Novellen dynasty may indeed be their contribution towards the natural nationalism that Oren presents. Whether or not it is truly feasible, it remains a powerful motivation and ideal that continues to influence thinkers and politicians alike.

 

---

 

Legitimist Theory (Oren as Bloodright)

 

“But Eshtael said ‘Lo, wickedness cannot undo what wickedness has done. Your home shall never return in your life. But know that God is great, and the waters of Gamesh are His creation. He names the pure and the impure, the good and the evil. He names you His prophet, Godfrey of the line of Horen.’”

-Gospel 6:17-21[12]

 

As previously mentioned, Oren as a state has only ever existed as a monarchy, led by a singular ruler who at times has had varying influence and power on the state which he rules. Due to the feudal framework which has existed in humanity since time immemorial, this trend is logical. Traditionally, nearly all human-dominated polities have been controlled by an assortment of nobility which pass their titles through blood inheritance, typically via primogeniture succession. Some instances of republican systems have existed in the past, such as Galmore and Ves, but even they are heavily influenced by patrician clans who tend to monopolize power within the government. For all intents and purposes, humanity has been and most likely will remain a society centered on strong hierarchical families.

 

As government structures are hyper-focused on inheritance thanks to its aristocratic substratum, a question emerges as to who rightfully bears claim to a title. And a lofty position such as Holy Orenian Emperor only aggravates this ponderance. Any student of history will know the countless civil wars which have sprung from this bloody query. From the invasion of the Tarus family to overthrow Emperor Sigismund, the Franciscan Massacre, the Vibian Coup, the rebellion which ousted Emperor Alexander I and the Schism War which sprung from it, the Massacre of Wetts and the fruits of the Dukes’ War, the assassination of Guy de Bar and the subsequent Horen Restoration, the Anarchy of Emperor John II, the chaos of the Mardonic era and the child-slaughter of Emperor John VI, the brutal conquests of Emperor Aurelian, the War of Two Emperors and the Time of Troubles, and finally the turmoil of the Rubern War and the attempted invasion of Godric Rurikid. All of these and even more examples show the critical importance people throughout the ages have placed on “rightful inheritance.” Not only this is that defining what constitutes this “rightful inheritance” is rife with conflicting perspectives. As summarized by the historian Ebs Telrunya,

 

“The most striking finding of the study is the paucity of ‘ideal’ successions. Instead, the succession of the Holy Orenian Emperor is more often characterized by discord, political crisis. While there has been a recent run of mostly peaceful transfers of power, this has been the exception, not the rule. The succession of the Imperial Throne appears to be incredibly unstable, and there is a ~15% chance of a succession resulting in the dissolution of the Empire, and that increases to just under 20% when excluding those successions classified as ascensions to the Imperial throne due to the constitution or reconstitution of the Empire. However, excluding those same cases would produce a rate of 27% for the passage of the crown from father to son or grandson, better though still not spectacular.”

-Ebs Telrunya, Elven scholar and antiquarian of human history[13]

 

Many families who have ruled Oren have come and gone, and commonly claims derive from blood descent from one of these ancient clans. The most important of these applications towards Imperial dignity are educed from familial kinship with the Canonist prophets. As previously noted, all prophets recognized by the Church of the Canon have served in one way or another as rulers of a united humanity. That direct blood from a previous prophet gives superior claim is a legal concept of timeless antiquity. Found in the Canon Scrolls, Harren Horenson, the eldest son of Prophet Horen, was first seen as the natural inheritor of his realm. When Harren denied the laurels of prophethood, the claim then passed to the senior claimant of Horen’s family at the time, his grandson Owyn Godwinson through his second son Godwin Horenson. Later in history, when Godfrey reunited Oren and declared himself Emperor, much of his legitimacy rested on being the senior member of Owyn’s family through the male line. Prophetic lineage remains a common appeal, and some even considered it the exclusive right which permits an individual to take the Imperial office. As seen below,

 

“Imbued with the prophetic tongue, Godfrey I Horen carved out what would be known as the First Orenian Empire; the magnum opus of all civilizations to come. Only the heir of Horen and those it blessed could inherit EMPIRE, the culmination of all Mankind in their greatest form. Soon thereafter, Black Dragon smote the enemies of Humanity. With the blood of Horen seated upon the throne, all who stood against failed. The safety and hegemony of Horen was cemented as status quo, from days past to present breathing.”

-Anonymous, a brief snippet from a pamphlet encouraging the worship of the divine nature of the House of Horen[14]

 

We can see that Oren, separate from an idealistic vision, is a right given through blood claim, specifically rooted in prophetic lineage. While this concept is criticized by some, it is undeniable that it brings about a natural sense of legitimacy to the eyes of the masses. Even families which did not claim prophetic lineage from Owyn still made their links known. The Carrion family for example used the prophethood of their founder Emperor Sigismund to cement their own fatidic claim to the throne on numerous occasions. Another unrelated family, the Chivays, used their close ties as companions of Emperor Godfrey I to also shore up their licitness in taking the throne. Most curiously as well, a miracle is recorded that Godrey had appeared in a miraculous vision to on-viewers in the Imperial capital, a story that was well recorded as proof of Emperor Peter I’s righteous ascension.

 

Exceptions do exist to this general trend. When Daniel of Alkhazar abdicated to take the cloth, the heir was not his son, but rather a powerful landowner from the House of Perea. Similarly, after the death of Pompey Perea, another influential noble from the House of Sheffield was chosen instead of his offspring. This trend was briefly broken by Edmund Sheffield when he designated his eldest son Enor as heir, although this was itself foregone when the warlords Gaius Marius and Ezekial Tarus divided Oren amongst themselves. Later on, upon the conclusion of the Schism War, Andrew Vydra declared himself King of Oren, resting his claim upon his successful leadership of the Canonist League. When Vydra was assassinated, he chose the aristocrat Olivier de Savioe to inherit him. Olivier also chose his heir not from his own children, but instead appointed his distant cousin Guy de Bar to succeed him.

 

Since Daniel of Al Khazar, over 13 families have claimed the monarchy of Oren (whether as Kings or Emperors). Since Emperor Godfrey I, houses which have sat on the Imperial throne include Horen, Carrion, Chivay, Horen of Alstion (Johannians), Horen of Helane (Pertinaxi), Horen of Marna, Horen of Sedan, and Novellen. The most prevalent among this list are the Horens descending from Godfrey, now split into a multitude of disparate branches and clans. Novellen, although of Sarkozic blood from the agnatic line, also staked their claim through enatic descent from Empress Anne (daughter of Emperor Peter III and member of the House of Helane). Only the families of Carrion and Chivay can be considered as separate dynastical entities in their entirety.

 

The question of rightful legitimacy for a particular dynasty is a tricky one, made difficult due to the rampant fragmentation of classical dynasties into numerous cadet branches. For instance, much of the turmoil that occurred since the Sixth Empire and leading to the rise of the Novellen dynasty can be chalked to a feud between numerous cousins of the Horen family. Today, the House of Horen can be divided into multiple subfamilies. The Johannian branch is led by seniority through the royal House of Alstion, while their junior branch of the House of Sedan continues to survive as vassals to the former. Multiple clans from the Pertinaxi persist as well, although the chiefest of whom that maintains any viable political power is the House of Aert, the undisputed leaders of the heartland realm of Veletz and Adria. The Marnantine branch is considered extinct after the War of Two Emperors, although legitimized baseborn lines exist (such as the House of Arkent).

 

Novellen as well has fallen to division. A branch of the family that supported the short-lived Emperor Peter IV escaped southward to establish their own kingdom, continued on by the House of Balian (who notably still style themselves “Princes of the Holy Orenian Empire”). Another descends from the rebellious younger brother of Peter IV who claimed the throne as King Frederick of Oren, now called the House of Stassion and operates in an independent heartland principality. A third branch, the House of the Petra, also remains in the heartlands and rules as monarchs in their own right. Other lines from Novellen do exist, although they do not retain the same power or political legitimacy as the previous three.

 

Carrion is represented by the chiefest of the crowlords, the House of Bihar, descendants of Emperor Alexander I who have ruled Haense for numerous centuries. Other branches are either sworn banners of Bihar or of unremarkable authority and influence.

 

The Chivay dynasty today is all but extinct. Modern cadets may persist in one way or another, but they are of little contemporary relevance.

 

Whether any of these aforementioned families hold senior claims amongst the rest is beyond the purpose of this essay. It is (rightfully) a hotly debated topic. However, that may be, it is important to note that numerous blood claimants to a potential Oren restoration exist.

 

---

 

Populist Theory (Pax Orenia)

 

“Humanity, created by God in the image of His Prophets, is bestowed upon through His Divine Power the guaranteed, inalienable rights of Man, held above all law and rule. Through the power of the Imperial Crown, they are enforced and protected immaculate and indefinite, only transgressed by committing a mortal sin.”

-Emperor Joseph I[15]

 

The tumultuous reign of Emperor Anthony sparked a new movement of thought in Oren which broke from original appeals towards faith, blood, and nationalism. This theory rooted itself in the burgeoning beliefs of liberal ideals, where the safeguard and protection of individuals became paramount. The would-be claimant Emperor Joseph I first began this approach through his declaration of the “Rights of Man”, which enshrined within law that Oren was not simply an authority to be obeyed, but a government with sacred duty to the protection of those it claims to rule. Unlike the previous separatist movements which plagued Oren in the past, the new Josephism did not deny the need of an Empire, and in fact defended its existence vehemently. Rather, it saw Oren as a requirement towards true peace: an establishment of a benign Pax Orenia.

 

The term “Pax Orenia” can be found as early as the 16th century, although a strain of jingoism continued to proliferate in Oren which left the name altogether a simple term for imperialism. Use of “Pax Orenia” as meaning the protection of the lives and rights of people within Oren burgeoned forth in response to the destruction wrought in the aftermath of the War of Two Emperors, which soured many to continued revanchism against historical enemies and potential conquests. Divided humanity, to those subscribing to this philosophy, simply wrought further wars, conflicts, and bloodshed. In responding to the rebellion in eastern Oren, the poet Dietrich van Jungingen wrote,

 

“The continued existence of Oren speaks to its almost transcendent longevity and incredible immortality – whenever it ceases to exist, there will always be those who succeed in ensuring it returns. The Empire is therefore worth fighting for; it is the ultimate symbol of humanity’s desire to create and maintain a strong union of peoples. Oren brings peace. Oren brings order. Oren brings prosperity.”

-Dietrich van Jungingen, Haeseni poet and philosopher during the reign of Emperor Peter III[16]

 

For Jungingen, “Oren brings peace”, and it is only with Oren that this peace can be achieved. But what does this peace mean? Is peace simply the control of humanity by a powerful lord, who subjugates any opposition through militaristic means? Or is there something else which must underline this Pax Orenia to be legitimate? For the school of Orenian liberalism which blossomed under the Novellen dynasty, peace means more than only militaristic domination. Rather, any sanctity of armistice can only be achieved if the divisions within humanity itself can be diluted, if not altogether abolished outright. From an anonymous pamphlet written during the reign of Emperor Joseph II,

 

“These blueborns rode off to war atop great stallions; they wined and dined on the finest of imports; they enjoyed the greatest decadence but also the greatest pressure. For while they enjoyed the benefits of their station in life, so too did they struggle with the duties that it entailed. Meanwhile, the redbloods toiled in the fields; they marched and died without ceremony or pomp; they ate piss poor bread and slept on beds of hay [. . .] Joseph of Marna realized that one’s birth ought not decide the trajectory of their lifetime. He believed that opportunity was every man’s birthright, that each and every one of us should be able to rise to the occasion and serve our Empire if our merit and ability warranted it.”

-Anonymous, quoted from a pamphlet promulgated by the liberals of the Imperial Diet under Emperor Joseph II[17] 

 

Stratification of the ruler and the ruled created the conflicts of the past, such that even if a singular Orenian government can be achieved, it will ultimately fail if unable to overcome the separation of governor and provincial. The “blueborns” and “redbloods” must both be allowed within the halls of governance, and no matter the ethnic, nationalist, or physical demarcation they may bear, the ideal state should allow a diverse set of peoples to share power.

 

If a crucial step towards establishing a peaceful Orenian state requires the participation and protection of the masses, it further leads to the thought that a legitimate Oren can only exist with the consent of those it rules. This consent rests upon a reciprocal agreement between citizens for the protection of themselves, which in turn, they can cherish certain liberties through the diffusion of authority. As written by the statesman Arthur Callahan in a letter to Terrence May,

 

“Let us first imagine a world without any laws, a state of anarchy if you will. In it, we are given the freedom to ‘all things’ (return to my previous letter regarding Free Will), ranging from everything like baking bread and caring for others to typically horrendous deeds such as theft and murder. We, as individuals, are inherently self-preserving creatures- whether a Canonist or otherwise, you will acknowledge that most sane men will desire life over death, their belongings secure rather than stolen, and so on and so forth. In order to create a state where we can self-preserve our bodies and minds from the treachery of others, people have come together and agreed to surrender certain freedoms in order to create rights for others. This is a concept of reciprocal benefit [. . .]  only by the consent of men which brings any [peace and legitimacy]. It is only through establishment of political and legal communities that any authority can take root, which in itself can only come from the consent of the governed.”

-Arthur Callahan, Imperial statesman, self-proclaimed radical liberal, and courtier of Emperor Peter III[18]

 

The value of governance, no matter its form, only comes from its power to preserve the basic rights of men in the country. When these rights are protected, according to Callahan, there emerges a mutual consent of the population to the current regime. In the wake of tyranny, this consent can be taken away, which revokes any dignity for the government to govern. By this, Oren as a political reality can only burgeon to the world when the people have consented to it: the Emperor receives his crown not from a higher power or blood right, but rather a vis-a-vis contract between himself and his subjects. Without the willingness of the people to fall under the Imperial banner, Oren becomes defunct.

 

Yet how does this consent manifest? For the Josephite, it exteriorizes when the needs and desires of the masses are met, such as civil rights in voicing their opinions in government to having crucial life standards fulfilled, such as sanctity of their lives and physical requirements of shelter, food, and property ownership. But this brings heavy critique. Does every man simply want a filled belly or jovial neighbor? Humans, as seen throughout history, can and have desired that which is considered ambiguous or obscene. When a group of individuals simply want power for the sake of it, how can they be satisfied? Furthermore, there are desires which cannot be fulfilled, due to the sake of surrendering certain freedoms for the sake of political expediency. For example, the Kingdom of Haense enjoyed a long existence of the right to grant noble titles, which was taken away by the Novellen dynasty in consolidating their power. While citing the need for political unity, this drama became one the leading dividing factors that led to the secession of Haense from the Holy Orenian Empire. The rights of landlords versus the rights of the common individual are not so easily rectified.

 

A question also glares on the revocation of consent towards a government. If a people decide that they no longer consent to rule under a unified Oren and instead opt for independence, are they allowed to do such? If the pro-Orenist liberal is to be believed, then consent in this matter cannot be taken away; yet if we take this as truth, then this disqualifies their entire argument in its entirety. There is no qualifiable separation between what can be consented to and what cannot be. One could argue that a unified state is the only way to truly guarantee the protections and rights of humanity, and that therefore this is a preexisting requisite for any just state. However, this is troublesome to truly rectify in proper, coherent philosophy. Some may point to the peaceful secession of Haense by grant of Emperor Joseph II may give legitimacy to a people desiring their consent to be granted towards independence. But if all peoples desire then their own nation-state, can Oren ever then be truly legitimate?

 

Even if the people do not desire full separation but rather a change of regime, what gives credence to them rising with arms to do such? Is there a quantifiable breaking point where the tyrannies of the state become so heinous that revolution is the only way? The massacre at Ves by Emperor Anthony is commonly pointed to as an event so diabolical that consent would be rightfully taken away. Yet history is not typically so black-and-white. When Sigismund Carrion crowned himself emperor, were the rebels of Charles Tarus and Sophia Horen right in raising the banner of rebellion after they and their supporters were cut from the organs of power? What about the Ducal Coalition, led by Hughes Sarkozic, who sought to overthrow Olivier de Savioe after the disastrous Massacre of Wett? When Emperor John II refused to intervene in the land conflict between Petyr Barbanov and Tobias Staunton, was the latter right in raising the fist of rebellion against the crown? These questions are difficult to determine solid answers for, and they become hazy in the veil of popular consent.

 

Lastly, it should be noted that in pragmatic terms, a truly just state may never be achieved, atleast in the vein expounded by the radical liberals. Certain political realities deign the need for uneven distribution of power. For example, if the rights of landowners and influential persons are allowed to fester without course correction, then a situation such as the Sixth Empire may emerge: a defanged crown which allows petty disputes and jockeying for power to become tantamount. Yet too much centralized control of a singular polity may lead to the disenchantment of the provincial masses, and separatist movements could emerge, such as during the rule of the Johannians and Novellens.

 

Yet despite all this, the image of peace and prosperity through the defense of the people which are governed is commonplace even in modern political parlance. Monarchs and lords commonly make oaths to defend their people, and indeed many modern nations contain legal rights which are enshrined for their peoples, such as in Haense, Petra, and Aaun. Justice is a common appeal, and without it, it becomes difficult to establish any legitimate regime, especially in the case of Oren.

 

---

 

Realist Theory (Right of Conquest)

 

“Our race is glorious, or perhaps was glorious not because of our capacity for lofty ideals, for words, for debate. Our legacy, our foundation was built by conquerors. Forging the steel bonds of [the] Empire with the blood and the soil of humanity, and the bones of its foes. Those who would not yield to our ancient forebears, be they man or subhuman were swiftly subdued.”

-Godric Rurikid, a highlander warlord and sworn enemy of Emperor Peter III[19]

 

Philosophical appeals and arguments alone do not constitute an empire; indeed, for any state, its primary mode of existence comes from the exertion of influence and power. Without such, a state in effect ceases to exist as a constituted reality. This power stems from control, done through means of arms and coercion, and is used to both retain control of one’s domains and defend it from would-be foreign predators. For the realist, power is everything; and on a physical level, they are verily correct.

 

Any Orenian state can only exist if the regime in charge can manifest its authority. This includes the use of armed forces to protect the lands and conquer new ones, as well as holding certain authoritative controls over the people they govern. Indeed, the very foundations, as Rurikid pointed out, rests upon this domination: men such as Daniel of Alkhazar, Emperor Godfrey I, and Emperor John I validated their rule through the conquest and defeat of their enemies, and incorporation of separatists into the greater wholes of their domains. Oren was “built by conquerors”, and it cannot be understated that the formation of any Orenian state commonly comes with bloodshed and war. But this war is not only from the outward subjugation of peoples, but also a domestic defense from those who would attempt to despoil the state. As stated by Emperor Godfrey I,

 

“You are a people who have faith such as no one else on the face of this land. And [to] you who have chosen open warfare against [these] people that pride themselves on their history, civilization and culture and possess the material resources and the capacity, the expertise, the knowledge, the coolness, the initiative, the determination, the steadfastness and the bravery. You shall never succeed, our people have become one that can not be disregarded, one that can not be ever defeated, one that shall never kneel to foreign race or creed.”

-Emperor Godfrey I[20]

 

While Emperor Godfrey I may use appeals such as faith, nationalism, and peacekeeping, ultimately his authority rested on the fact he could protect his domains from potential enemies. Punishing one’s foes and the evildoers against one’s lands is the best way to protect their sphere of influence over those they rule. Even Publius Bracchus, a renown legalist during the time of the Savoyard dynasty and Emperor John I, makes this appeal,

 

“They remain in our grasp, awaiting the day we finally chose to throw them to the floor and crush them under our boots. Though it may not be safe to hold snakes in your hand, our legal system has been blessed with an iron fist, impervious to damage, that smashes those who are so quick to abandon both their faith and the state. One that sweeps aside the leeches that would drain the life from good men and women of Oren and, most of all, finds purpose in guiding our people.”

-Publius Bracchus, at first a loyalist of the Savoyard dynasty and later supporter of Emperor John I[21]

 

If the exercise of power is the sole legitimating factor to one’s rule, then it comes to show that if one is simply powerful enough to enforce their influence upon the rest of humanity, then they are the rightful ruler of the lands. This power, of course, does not necessarily need to be through sword and buckler, but also through control of institutions and pragmatic diplomacy. Yet commonly this manifests in the need for strong martial forces capable of both internal policing and external warfare.

 

While it is true that any Emperor requires authority backed by the weight of physical power, it does leave a certain instability to the very institution if such power is the only legitimizing factor involved. Any conqueror with enough funds and men could rise and declare themselves the rightful lord of the lands, and as seen in many historical examples, the use of conquest alone does lead to unstable realms. For example, the violent subjugation of realms such as Haense and Curon under the Pertinaxi led to rebellions, most famous of which being the War of Two Emperors. Another case, the Anarchy of Emperor John II, was precipitated by powerful landowners who sought their own control and authority by force of arms. Even if emperors have conquered their way to the throne, their rule thereafter always rests on appeals made beyond the strength of arms. While people are physical realities, their minds live in the ideal, and ideas are required in order to cement one’s legitimacy to the governed masses.

 

Furthermore, if the realist approach is granted as the sole reason for any Oren, then it becomes difficult to justify any appeals towards human unification beyond simply defeating one’s neighbors. Why should the neighboring kingdom acknowledge your claim, if your claim only rests on the capacity to kill their people and destroy their institutions? The downfall of Emperor Philip I can be pointed to as the realist approach taken to its extreme: he held the power to punish the plotting Savoyards and Courlanders, yet it inevitably led him to a rebellion which he could not recover from. Verily, there requires certain concessions beyond simple subjugation for an Orenian state to last beyond the initial conquests; many Empires in history have fallen due to a conqueror’s heir unable to handle the backlash of the conquered provinces. One could say they lost their legitimacy when they could not defend themselves, but this leads to a constant bloody struggle within humanity: one in which wars against the state are common, especially among the very humans the nation is supposed to unify.

 

However, it is readily apparent that any state requires power in order to be legitimate. One cannot rule simply by words alone, but there is a crucial ingredient of real power in order to exert authority over the realm. There has never existed a successful realm without the use of atleast some domination. And, in the future, if any state was to vie for the dignity of the Imperial throne, it would require a projection of power; without such, there can be no empire.

 

---

 

Thus concludes this lengthy dissertation on Orenism, in which its research has been a project of mine for sometime. I have attempted to be as unbiased as possible in detailing the arguments and reasonings found within this work. Thoughts, opinions, and criticisms are thoroughly encouraged and supported.

 

Regarding my own views, I have thought deeply on the resurrection of Oren as an institution. I confess I am torn on the matter. We live today as fragmented units, torn from each other through political realities and oppositional ambition. Coming together might finally break the miasma and petty conflict which proliferated in the realm of Horen for nigh over two hundred years. Despite this, the realist within drags me back down. Is an Orenian project even feasible in the current age? If any Empire was to be reestablished, there would surely be ungracious winners and desperately sour losers. Such is the name of the game after all. Maybe human unity will not be found in an Empire but another unimagined institution? Thoughts for another time, I’m afraid.

 

Prophets’ Blessings,

Amleth, Bishop of Andrikev”

 

---

 

Footnotes

 

[1] - [Link] | This quote comes from the “Exordium on Imperial Authority”, written by the father of Emperor John I as justification for the rule of his newly-installed son. Since its authorship, it had remained the opening piece of all Orenian legal codexes until the fall of the Novellen dynasty.

 

[2] - [Link] | The essay “On Human Unity” was written by a Canonist priest and Owynist follower Albanus Cuptor during the time of the Novellen dynasty. At the time, serious agitation by provincial forces for increased autonomy and independence struck throughout the Novellen regime, and the ideal of human unity came into serious question with the rise of ethnic violence.

 

[3] - [Link] | After the peaceful secession of the Kingdom of Haense from the Holy Orenian Empire, High Pontiff James II delivered an address regarding the situation. A cleric closely aligned with the political elite at the time, he generally lamented the separation of the two nations.

 

[4] -  [Link] | The “Revelations of the Immaculate Throne” were written by High Pontiff Daniel III, a son of Emperor John I and younger brother of Emperor John II. Many of the reforms found within led to his removal from the pontifical office by a band of disenfranchised cardinals. Most importantly, this document is the last real attempt by clerical leadership to declare any emperor divine or divinely-descended, although more contemporary examples of movements do exist as a populist movement (such as the divinity movement under Emperor Aurelian).

 

[5] - [Link] | The thesis “On Rulership” was written by Brandt Barclay, a highlander scion who served as vassal to the Kingdom of Aaun under the Johannian House of Alstion. Much of it includes his own views and experiences as an autonomous prince and ruler.

 

[6] - [Link] | Before his ascension as emperor, Joseph II wrote the letter “On Pessimism” as a critique of the highlander warlord Godric Rurikid and his attempted invasion of the Holy Orenian Empire during the reign of Emperor Peter III. While still relying on religious reasoning, this writing in particular began to move towards a view that humanity, being one race, was naturally destined to be unified in a “tapestry of man.”

 

[7] - [Link] | The compilation work “On the Nature of Nobility and Success of Nations” is perhaps the magnum opus of Edward Winter, a politician and prince who operated throughout the tumultuous periods of Emperors William, Sigismund, Peter I, Robert I, and Tobias. Although at times opposed to the Orenian state for pragmatic reasons (such as his opposition to King Francis), he remained a stalwart loyalist of Oren for most of his life.

 

[8] - [Link] | Augustus Montfort’s writings came at a time when Oren first burgeoned again under the leadership of Andrik Vydra. The toils of the Schism War placed a strong emphasis on the unity of the divided princely estates which made up the Canonist League. His work “The Glory of Oren” is one of these exaltations of togetherness despite political realities of separation.

 

[9] - [Link] | Matthias de Lyon’s text “Patriotism, Piety, Humanity” was written during a time of destructive conflict. After the murder of Andrik Vydra, the royal crown of Oren passed to Olivier de Savioe and the Savoyard dynasty, which precipitated great dissent among the loyal followers of Hughes de Sarkozy.

 

[10] - [Link] | “Letters From a Farmer in Kaedrin” is a set of dissertations written by Frederick Armas during the early regime of Emperor Peter III, created in response to polemics created by anti-Imperial agents and those disfavorable to the current governmental hegemony.

 

[11] - [Link] | A snippet from the farewell address of Simon Basrid when he resigned as Archchancellor under Emperor Peter III. He acted in this official capacity for the majority of the reign of Peter III, and is considered one of the founding fathers of the lengthy Novellen regime.

 

[12] - [Link] | A quote from the Scroll of Gospel, the third of four scrolls considered sacred within the Canonist Faith. The passage in question regards the presentation of the laurels of prophethood to Emperor Godfrey, specifically highlighting that he was of “the Line of Horen.”

 

[13] - [Link] | This is a study done by the famed Elven historian Ebs Telrunya, who has specialized in human history over the last few centuries. Most of his tomes include information now lost to modern chroniclers, and they remain a golden standard in majority of modern human libraries.

 

[14] - [Link] | A pamphlet found during the days of the Johannian dynasty, seemingly calling for the worship of the divine nature of the House of Horen. While it seemingly enjoyed little popularity during its day, the mere existence of such ideas being spread shows a constant belief in that a certain family of blood carries an intrinsic claim to the Imperial office.

 

[15] - [Link] | From the most recent publication of the “Rights of Man” by Emperor Joseph I during the reign of Emperor Peter III, this declaration was promulgated by Joseph in response to the excesses of Emperor Anthony’s tyranny. While Joseph ultimately failed to consolidate his claim, the “Rights of Man” became enshrined in succeeding regimes as well as numerous states which succeeded Oren.

 

[16] - [Link] | “On Curonia, Suffonia, and the Empire'' was written by the renowned Haeseni author Dietrich van Jungingen, addressing the issues of the collapse of the eastern province of Curon and the rise of the separatist Suffonia region during the regime of Emperor Peter III. The turmoil in Oren’s east, sparked by rebellion and attempted invasion, sparked a curious wave of loyalty to the Empire, specifically in defending it as a peacekeeper and rebuilder in the wake of the debilitating War of Two Emperors.

 

[17] - [Link] | “Joseph’s Dream” is an anonymous essay written by a liberal member of the Novellen government, specifically heralding the progressive ideals which Emperor Joseph I promulgated.

 

[18] - [Link] | The “Pragmatic Origins of Imperial Authority” first originated as a letter in a string of correspondences between the radical Arthur Callahan and the moderate Terrence May regarding the debate between moralism and liberalism at the time of Emperor Peter III. While Callahan was heavily ostracized for his views, his work remains the most clear delineation of the concept of popular consent.

 

[19] - [Link] | A snippet from Godric Rurikid's "Reflections on the Everwar and on Humanity", written originally as a critique against Emperor Peter and a justification for Rurikid's war against him. Despite being written by an enemy of a contemporary Oren, it is perhaps one of the greater reflections of the realist approach to the establishment of an imperial Orenian state.

 

[20] - [Link] | This is the recorded final speech of Emperor Godfrey I before his death. Both diplomat and conqueror in life, Godfrey depended upon a strong, efficient military to exert domination over his enemies and control over his own patrimony.

 

[21] - [Link] | Publius Bracchus had supported the Savoyard dynasty during the Dukes’ War and his speech “Means To Prosperity” remains the pinnacle of his support to the family. However, after breaking with Guy de Bar in the latter days of the Savoyard regime, he threw his support behind Emperor John I and supported the Horen claimant till his death.

[Dogged 2129]

"A great argument as always." Otto smirks as he reads over the document.

[satinkira 5921]

"So true. Haense, fulfil your destiny." Yandel said.

[SimplySeo 5270]

"I would sooner slit my children and grandchildren's throats on the steps of Saint Caius's Cathedral than accept an Orenian Emperor." Remarked Numenatar, former King of Numendil

[ErikAzog 3313]

"Maybe this isn't such a bad idea." said Father Belisarios, as he conducted his usual mass in the Kingdom of Balian.

[Asutto 1990]

A Veletzian Sellsword lofted a hefty sigh as the Synopsis made the rounds through the Midlands. The idea of Imperialism or, Orenism as dubbed by the Bishop was something that plagued his mind in the recent years. Despite being a mostly uneducated sellsword, he still was able to note the lack of ambition by Humanity as a whole. It made for a truly tragic state of affairs. Each human Kingdom was but a mere copy of another with a supposed "culture" to credit as a difference which in reality, served only as an aesthetic to mask the lifelessness of each state. 

 

Orenism, as it was, at least offered an alternative to the remedial lifestyle exhibited by the modern states. It allowed for ambition and change to flourish and for the individual to challenge the status quo. But alas, as the sellswords placed the missive away in a dusty chest he knew, there would be nothing more than the King and his Kingdom. The age of humanity was over. What was now, was all there would ever be. 

[ratlordmagic 793]

“Oren is dead. Let it rest upon the ash heap of history where it belongs.” Count Waclaw Jazlowiecki stated. “I would sooner my line be wiped out in resistance than kneel before an Emperor.”

[Jentos 6881]

"Be wary, the ghosts of the past always come to haunt the minds of men." Murmured a single-eye'd warrior to the dancing flames of the fireplace. Bitter memories of inbred emperors and the ruination of Johannesburg swam in his head. 

[MaltaMoss 1771]

The Ghost of an ancient imperial soldier murmurs in his slumber beneath the forgotten world. 

"Do you want the boring status quo or not make up your mind!"

[Minuvas 2884]

"God Save the Emperor!" Remarked Nikolas Melphestaus, his father having told him many imperial glories. 

[Javert 5573]

"I'd sooner allow my firstborn son to succumb to pneumonia before I knelt and kissed the ass of some Orenian Emperor." Proclaimed Harald Eiriksson, who was living with one of the numerous nomadic Skanarri tribes after leaving his life in Norland behind.

[Cheese 2307]

1 hour ago, satinkira said:

"So true. Haense, fulfil your destiny." Yandel said.

Liridona stares at her nephew, and shakes her head. "We do niet do that here."

[Nectorist 7423]

When Philip III was asked about the nature of his Empire by his son-in-law, the Count Sarkozy, he had this to say:

 

Spoiler

"Look over these fields, my son, that we deem the Lower Petra. Count each and every manor that dots them, all of the farmsteads and crops and towns that we can see from here alone. It is a people, it is a spirit, it is an essence that must be united. In the north, men of hearty character, kin of the Haeseni and the Norlanders, swear themselves to me. Yet it is not Philip Amadeus that they owe their fealty to, but to Philip III. Philip III is no man, he is a symbol of something greater- the unifying spirit that drives men to form families on the smallest level and empires on the greatest one. The role of the Emperor is simply to be the vehicle of the natural desires of men, and so we have seen commoners rise to such a rank, foul men claim the throne, and usurpers strike down the man who came before them. There is nothing mystical about our station, even if it is one that God ordains, but the will of man is a powerful thing. We must be diligent stewards of these inclinations and strive at every opportunity to ensure that these disparate realms may be governed by a fair hand and allowed to interact, trade, and grow in peace and safety."

 

 

When Demetrius Barrow was asked about the nature of Empire generations later, he had this to say:

 

Spoiler

"An Empire may be a good thing in certain circumstances, but in the present it is an aberration to the progress of man. Conflict drives all, be it an argument at the dinner table or terrible wars that kill thousands. Our history is a progressive one, but no progress can be made with idle peace. Something must give way and something must break. Peoples must be ruined and slain for something new to arise and give a new step to this story of man. An Empire, at least one that is not ephemeral, constrains and contradicts this because it wishes to subsume all factional rivalries beneath a shared identity that will maintain peace and keep order. This may work well when there is some great outside threat that demands temporary unification, but as we have seen time and time again, when that threat subsides, or alternatively, when that threat overwhelms this combined strength, these factional differences surface again. Typically, diplomacy or warfare are the two main bodies by which these disputes are resolved, but an Emperor introduces a third method: a decree. This only delays an inevitable confrontation and does not resolve the underlying tension, so when it does burst it is all the more violent. That is why an Empire cannot be formed now, should not be formed now, and will fall with ease if it is formed now."

 

[Narthok 9213]

Manfred von Arichsdorf, a direct descendant of the storied Godric, and a Marcherlord of some reknown in his own time would come across the writings of the Heartland cleric. Being well versed in the scholarship of his ancestor and the discourse of the age he would frown, putting pen to paper and composing a response.

 

The blood of the prophet has been much thinned in these modern days. Many claim the blood of the prophet yet lack the characteristic zeal that once exemplified the line of northern kings. Herein I shall speak to the mind of my predecessors the Edvardssons, the nation builders of scholars of the Rurukid. 

 

The author has pointed to the writings of Godric. Any serious historian will agree that he is the most significant of the modern Rurics. However, the nuance of Godric's reign are often missed by Canonist Scholars. Prior to the outbreak of the Rubern war it was widely established that the Duke of Morsgrad was actively seeking integration into the Imperium. This can be observed through his participation in the punitive campaign against the Orcs. If anything it was his strong public denunciation of the toe-sucking incident that likely sparked hostilities. 

Even prior to the era of Godric the settlements of Nordengrad under Thoromir II or Dunharrow under Alvar are both seen to be interested in the universal human project whilst still aspiring to maintain their particularities in regards to culture and ethnos. Even my own polity, nestled as it was in the beating heart of an Oren beset by a coalition of Haense and Dwarves fought desperately for the preservation of the grand Imperial project. Though at the time it had become clear that the humans of the heartlands had lost the stomach for Imperium by that point. The ignoble squabbling that occurred after our loss truly shamed the entirety of humanity.

 

If I was to give an account of what we desired, it would be the following. It is desirable that the entirety of humanity and its adjacent be unified under a single authority within a single supra-national polity. Unified humanity with decentralized political authority is the best solution to the question of human political organization. It is clear that excessive centralization in the model of Renatus, while extremely strong, suffers from two issues. First, the degree to which it is sustainable over the long term should the leadership lag is questionable. The iron fist ages and tires, and then as the author pointed out the legitimacy behind said fist becomes a matter of debate. Secondly, the withering of culture that occurs under these hyper-centralized regimes. When humanity are permanently on a war footing there is little in the way of law or culture that blooms.

The best of Humanity's Emperors have been those that have understood the wide variety of humans and have been able to forge individual compacts and agreements with each unique people. There cannot be a universal solution to particular problems. Each must be coaxed into imperium according to their own set of circumstances and needs.

 

Unfortunately, as was noted by my ancestor. The age of heroes is long over. We shall see if this new King of Haense has the spine to exceed the status quo of his predecessors and seize Imperium for himself. But as things stand the innumerable petty kings who squabble and preen brings shame to all of us. Let there be an Emperor once more. A humanity long united, must divide, a humanity long divided, must unit.

[DahStalker 2856]

(( [!] A frightened human-rper trembles with the Empire-posting. esterlen and sergeisala would be arriving soon. ))