Royal Courts
164 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 1k views
-
-
- 1 reply
- 673 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 614 views
-
- 1 reply
- 871 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 703 views
-
- 3 replies
- 748 views
-
- 0 replies
- 674 views
-
- 1 reply
- 481 views
-
- 0 replies
- 602 views
-
- 0 replies
- 377 views
-
- 1 reply
- 594 views
-
- 0 replies
- 712 views
-
- 0 replies
- 893 views
-
- 0 replies
- 346 views
-
- 1 reply
- 623 views
-
- 0 replies
- 473 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 460 views
-
- 1 reply
- 927 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 520 views
-
- 2 replies
- 745 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
