Brandybrook
Subforums
-
- No posts here yet
203 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 412 views
-
-
- 0 replies
- 435 views
-
- 1 reply
- 429 views
-
- 0 replies
- 357 views
-
- 2 replies
- 451 views
-
- 1 reply
- 503 views
-
- 2 replies
- 411 views
-
- 7 replies
- 721 views
-
- 2 replies
- 362 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 431 views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 369 views
-
- 0 replies
- 509 views
-
- 2 replies
- 516 views
-
- 5 replies
- 652 views
-
- 8 replies
- 817 views
-
- 14 replies
- 2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 456 views
-
- 6 replies
- 545 views
-
- 3 replies
- 441 views
-
- 6 replies
- 631 views
-
- 26 replies
- 2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 298 views
-
- 2 replies
- 495 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
VoteYou can vote once every 24 hours per site! Your daily vote helps you grow richer, and helps us get new players to keep the server growing.
Vote Megalink -- Click here to open all 6 voting sites at once! If this does not work for you, use the menu below.
Link 1 | Link 2 | Link 3 | Link 4 | Link 5 | Link 6 -
Latest Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
Okay cold take about the CRP system: Honor-based CRP is inherently at odds with High-Consequence CRP.
There are two ways to fix it
- Make a real combat system, which is made with the assumption of competition. People will optimize, but with a real combat system, you can actually balance it. (The more realistic option, since many magics follow this model)
- Make all consequences consent based. I don't gaf abt "avoiding consequences." If CRP is fully honor based (and thereby inherently unfair in absence of mutual good faith), then Theft, Maiming, Kidnapping, DC clauses, and PK Clauses should all require consent.
-
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
-
-
-
-
-
No Recent Status Updates -
.thumb.gif.9200049f1e9ae4031b060af8a5c775d7.gif)
.thumb.png.4e5370fc69f142d96a905e477cd5dd97.png)
.thumb.gif.f363e1e24ec35c023d600bb13f6d2f03.gif)
