Vege
-
Posts
1066 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Personas
Wiki
Rules
War
Systems
Safety
Player Conduct
Forums
Forms
Status Updates posted by Vege
-
wtf was that GM bias yesterday lmfaooooook
-
incoming haenseti screetching inbound
- Show previous comments 21 more
-
@drfate786 drfate is the lord gamer, gamer bro u need a gamer gunk clean up dirty gamer ggamer may make u angry gamer get ur gamer gunk spray out and clean ur head my gamer dude
-
What if left was right and right was left
-
Pyro stop sending ******** OOC messages threatening to OOCly blacklist people from Oren because they joined the winning side. You can't blacklist someone from something that isn't going to exist. You're ability to use scare tactics is over. You're finished.
-
Need some rep and attention? Any suggestions other than me posting a ban report on someone?
-
smiles quietly
-
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
- Show previous comments 11 more
-
yes @Dewper please enjoy it
@ImperialRoyalist wapples
@Treaty you love you im in your picture x
@Arygon sit back and watch get some popcorn
-
https://gyazo.com/05403e6f2fe4123dcbc19e05375662cd these words are truly inspirational pyro
-
can we just all be friends please
- Show previous comments 9 more
-
@frill nice did i actually
-
Best Bob Dylan / Johnny Cash song?
-
does Oren have any vassals left
-
thoughts on Clive the jester becoming king of courland??
-
are oranges called oranges because they are orange or is orange called orange because oranges are orange
-
Throwback to getting banned 7 times in one week by unbiased GMs when I rebelled against Oren.
-
Rep isn't everything on lotc Rep if you agree
-
-
good fight guys remember stay sweet not salty
-
sorry guys its true im a wasteman
-
justice for superawsome this is bias orenian mods who are against pvp
-
Dude which FM is trying to censor my support for Vulcus
-
Justice for Func, banned for a rule implemented post ban.
- Show previous comments 4 more
-
objection you misrepresented the issue in your case filing and in fact knowingly misrepresented information as your client did, in fact, not use a vague sentence that could have be construed or sourced from something else, he did, in fact, use the full legal name of the fictional character to whom spoilers referred, thus making your argument that it was unintentional, vague, and could have been referring to something else, in fact, not adequate defense. While it is possible he may not have spoiled in a malicious manner attempting to cause harm or injure to any other parties, the fact remains that he did as such, maliciously or otherwise.
-
i like oren
- Show previous comments 4 more
-
@Shalashask manchester is in the north, anywhere north of nottingham is u dirty scousers